| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Google Cloud SQL | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud SQL is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) with the capability and functionality of MySQL. | $0 per core hour |
 Microsoft Access | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools. | $139.99 per PC |
| Google Cloud SQL | Microsoft Access | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing varies with editions, engine, and settings, including how much storage, memory, and CPU you provision. Cloud SQL offers per-second billing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud SQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Google Cloud SQL Easier learning, simple features and settings with a very user-friendly application environment and flexible prices make Google Cloud [SQL] a pioneering option over competitors Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Microsoft Access Microsoft is much more simple and far less powerful. However, that is often times all that is needed for the job. Essbase is better for large organizations that have multi business units that need to pull from the same datasource. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Cloud SQL | Microsoft Access | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Database-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud SQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.5 | 5.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 7.9 | 7.0 |
| Availability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 6.4 | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 5.0 |
