Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Grammarly | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Grammarly in San Francisco provides its grammar improvement and AI driven writing assistance platform, available on free or paid premium and business plans. | $30 per month |
| Grammarly | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available on Pro plan for annual pricing. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Grammarly | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() Sr. Digital Strategist and Product Lead in Product Management at Cru (Non-profit Organization Management, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Grammarly I haven't used other tools, but the simplicity and instant usability of Grammarly alone is what makes it so that I don't even need to look for another similar tool. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly I would say Grammarly is better at spell check and grammar check, but ChatGPT and Claude are better all-around GAIs. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Marketing Associate in Marketing at Delhivery (Logistics & Supply Chain, 10,001+ employees) Chose Grammarly NA Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Business Analyst at Western Governors University (Higher Education, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Grammarly Grammarly is less robot-like and is better at picking up tone. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Compared to the ProWritingAid, Grammarly helps me with ease of use, real-time suggestions, tone, and clarity suggestions, and integration with other platforms provides cost v/s features above all. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Quality Engineer in Quality Assurance at Jhon Holland (Construction, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Grammarly While DeepSeek (or similar tools) is effective for specific use cases like sentence rephrasing or creative localization, Grammarly offers a more comprehensive and versatile solution for businesses. Its advanced features, integrations, and focus on professionalism make it the … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Once installed, Grammarly's proofreading abilities across all platforms (email, text, WordPress, etc.) are easy and intuitive. I don't even know if these other AI tools have that ability. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Small Business Owner in Corporate at Alcheme (Retail, 1-10 employees) Chose Grammarly I believe that both Grammarly and ProWritingAid are excellent tools that complement each other well. It would be fantastic to see an integration that combines the strengths of both. ProWritingAid provides comprehensive reports that are incredibly helpful. These reports … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Grammarly is easier to use than Gemini Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Grammarly is easy to use and more accurate i feel. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly I found that ProWritingAid is harder to use than Grammarly and that some of its tips are too technical. QuillBot was helpful for rewording sentences, but it didn’t check grammar as well as Grammarly does. It’s also not as strong when editing an entire document. In my opinion, … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Sales in Sales at Newton Print (Packaging & Containers, 11-50 employees) Chose Grammarly Grammarly makes it seamless to check your writing. Performance wise, they are about the same. But to use ChatGPT for checking writing, it required you to manually put the text in. It also doesn't allow you to automatically make the changes. It only makes suggestions which you … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Built-in grammar checks and AI. They’re helpful in a pinch, but not for longer pieces or anything in excess of a sentence. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Owner | Creative Designer in Marketing at Speck Designs (Design, 1-10 employees) Chose Grammarly Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Grammarly has a much more natural tone to suggestions. Often, when trying to rewrite an email or a letter/document with other products, it's hard to match those tones and still keep your document sounding authentic and with human empathy. Also, having the ability to make … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Marketing Director in Marketing at MGT Films (Construction, 11-50 employees) Chose Grammarly The only program I know of that is similar is the onboard Apple spell-check, which will often miss several things that Grammarly does not. I also use Google Docs, which is not nearly as helpful as Grammarly since you can use it anywhere. Docs also misses things that Grammarly … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Senior Vice President of Sales, North America in Sales at BigHand (Information Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Grammarly It's been too long since I used Wordrake, which I think says a lot about how well Grammarly is doing in the marketplace. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() CEO in Corporate at Dynamic Image Marketing Systems, Inc. (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Grammarly Apple AI has a Grammarly-like product, we tried using it, but it's not overlaid on top, and you need to select the text and then wait for the recommendation. It's possible Apple AI may improve but I cannot imagine it ever directly competing with Grammarly. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly Grammarly is easy to use and I like its suggestions. Other AI tools are better for generating text, but Grammarly is better at optimizing it and catching grammar mistakes. I also like that it has the extension which makes it easy to use Grammarly anywhere without having to sign … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly It isn't listed but LanguageTool is very good and I prefer it for the fact you can use it in any platform I have found so far including agency analytics. Therefore, it is easier for me to suggest this as a toolbar add on to the team. It isn't currently listed on TrustRadius … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly It's not a stack-up per se, but I use it side by side, which is very helpful. ChatGPT helps me by suggesting procedures, letters, and more. This is my go-to app for work. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly I just used its free feature and didn't explore it much, as the user interface was much better for Grammarly. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Technical and Customer Support Specialist in Customer Service at Advocacy Maven (Marketing & Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Grammarly Nothing comes close to Grammarly in terms of ease of use and quick setup. It practically works right out of the box without any rigorous configuration. It also allows you to pick a specific dialect which isn't available in other apps. And since Grammarly introduced AI features, … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Grammarly The useability of Grammarly and the ability to get live feedback is much better than other programmes. Other programmes prioritise AI to do the bulk of the writing. I like to do the bulk of the writing and let AI make suggestions; not the other way around. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() CTO in Manufacturing at Animal Necessity (Veterinary, 11-50 employees) Chose Grammarly We went with Grammarly over other online alternatives because of Grammarly's simple and easy to understand user interface. We feel like it was well equipped to deliver us the content and suggestions we needed without all of the extra fluff. It saves us time and isn't … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Grammarly | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 (92 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.8 (11 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 9.9 (11 ratings) |