TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Greenhouse vs. Tribepad Applicant Tracking Software

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Greenhouse

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AGreenhouse delivers a solution to help companies hire for what's next. Their hiring platform has users at companies like DoorDash, Dropbox and Wayfair, who use Greenhouse's intelligent guidance to design and automate all aspects of hiring.N/A

    Tribepad Applicant Tracking Software

    Score6 out of 10
    N/ATribepad’s talent acquisition platform brings ATS, CRM, Video Interviewing and Onboarding into one hub. The software is supported by a partner ecosystem with integrations across recruitment touchpoints, and a UK-based support team. Tribepad boasts users among organisations like Tesco, Greggs, NHS Professionals, Subway, Sodexo, Met Office, and Tarmac.N/A
    Pricing
    GreenhouseTribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GreenhouseTribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredRequired
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GreenhouseTribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Considered Both Products
    Greenhouse Software Inc.
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse has more integrations than Newton and is less confusing. I felt like with Newton you could accomplish the same task several different ways which ended up being more confusing than helpful. The email templates were less customizable and weren't optional for Newton as …
    Incentivized
    Chose Greenhouse
    It's not the worst but it's not the best. It has really great features but not the best user support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse is far better than the alternatives I have used in the past. It is sleeker, quicker, and has better functionality. With ADP it was very old and boring, but functional. iCIMS was good but lacked a lot of features and you had to pay for each of them. Taleo was older as …
    Incentivized
    Tribepad
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    GreenhouseTribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Recruiting / ATS
    Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Greenhouse and Tribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Feature
    Greenhouse
    8.7
    139 Ratings
    Tribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    7.8
    1 Ratings
    Job Requisition Management9.6123 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Company Website Posting9.6123 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Publish to Social Media7.3109 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Job Search Site Posting7.4115 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Customized Application Form7.4116 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Resume Management9.8129 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.0110 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Candidate Search8.0112 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Applicant Tracking9.4133 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Collaboration9.0126 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Task Creation and Delegation9.1104 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Email Templates9.5112 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    User Permissions9.0115 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Notifications and Alerts9.5128 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Reporting7.4111 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    User Ratings
    GreenhouseTribepad Applicant Tracking Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (142 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (60 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)