Greenlight Guru vs. Intellect QMS

Greenlight Guru is great for any company that wants to track or assign training. This system is also great for hosting quality system or non-quality system documents for the organization for employees to view or access at any time. This system is not great for billing, customer success, or sales-related tasks.

Incentivized

The QMS is well suited for standardizing the steps that go along with a process. The workflows and activity ownership makes it very easy to make sure that processes are completed according to the way the workflow is displayed. It becomes very simple to track down the stage at which a process is at. Processes are done in a linear orderly manner.

Incentivized

• Greenlight Guru is designed specifically for medical device companies. In that, the platform helps meet FDA and ISO regulatory requirements.
• Greenlight makes document review and approval easy - navigating the system is intuitive.
• The Greenlight Guru team appreciates unfiltered customer feedback. They do take the voice of the customer seriously and will work to implement feature requests.

Incentivized

• The applications are linked to each other so that activities can be shared, collaborated and escalated in one platform.
• Applications are sufficient "out of the box" but can be configured easily with its intuitive Design tools.
• Users can go to their personal dashboard to stay on top of their tasks across multiple applications and monitor status of activities in progress.
• The workflow-based applications keep activities moving forward efficiently but following standard processes.

Incentivized

• Periodic review of documents is an industry standard that is missing
• Would love a training matrix similar to the design matrix that links with procedures/work instructions
• Ability to modify or add parameters in the analytics function for better trending metrics
• Ability to modify or add to predetermined "lists" in CAPA, Audits, Nonconformance workspaces

Incentivized

• Although the configuration is a "no code" approach, there is a learning curve to effecting design changes.
• The user guide documentation provided is OK for administrators but needs to be more user-friendly for general users.
• Importing "legacy" data from existing processes can be cumbersome.

Incentivized

I really like how Greenlight is structure and how organized it is.

Incentivized

There is always resistance to change, but users are finding Intellect QMS to exceed their expectations as we migrate from our legacy "island" Sharepoint-based processes. Training is actually easiest to do hands-on, and users can learn quickly and then help train others. Users appreciate the personal navigation dashboard and the familiarity of the interface from one application to another. The workflow-driven applications are intuitive and make the system easy to navigate for all levels of users, although the learning curves will vary. The "Design-Test-Live" approach facilitates the implementation of configuration changes suggested by users.

Incentivized

We evaluated all 3 companies at the same time when we were "shopping" for an electronic quality management system solution. We spoke with other users about their experiences and received extremely positive feedback from 2 current Greenlight Guru clients. The clients highlighted the fact that they used Greenlight Guru in their audits, even with the FDA, and it went well. Greenlight Guru had comparatively more in-depth resources for SOPs, forms, and Work Instructions. Additionally, they have already made a name for themselves as general educators on Regulatory/Quality matters, as they run one of the few podcasts for the industry that are available. On the contrary, we had a very poor experience with the salesperson from Qualio, and had the impression that all documents would need to be manually created (couldn't just be uploaded), and there was a significant amount of work required to implement. (Conversely, the GG users said that implementation was quick, and only took a few months to get it up and running in a compliant manner.) For QT9, a current user gave a very poor review, and emphasized that it was not customizable, alerts could not be turned off, and that design controls were not part of the program. Since we required design controls as part of our QMS, we eliminated this product from our consideration.

Incentivized

We considered other "out of the box" platforms and decided to partner with Intellect QMS because of the ease of implementation and scalability. We went through a lot of demos and preferred the Intellect QMS user interface and responsiveness of the customer support team. The cost was competitive to launch and will allow us to add users and applications as we continue to grow. Many of the customer testimonials we reviewed pointed to Intellect QMS as the best fit for our organization.

Incentivized

• Greenlight Guru has freed up time and manpower to focus on improving the quality of our products rather than spending our energy on paperwork.
• Greenlight Guru has enabled a more effective organization system for all records that are required to be kept.

Incentivized

• Users appreciate the time and effort saved by having all of the QMS functions connected and in one place, without having to rely on emails, Sharepoint links multiple modes of communication to keep track of their activities and responsibilities.
• The no-code platform means we don't need IT support to maintain and configure the applications. One administrator was able to get the system launched and effective in just several weeks, with ongoing training and customization as users and applications are added.
• Our organization was recently certified to ISO 9001:2015. Intellect QMS helped us to navigate internal and audits confidently and effectively.

Incentivized