GTreasury vs. Treasury Systems

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GTreasury
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
GTreasury offers their treasury management system for funds and transfer management, liquidity tracking, customizable accounting rules with ERP integration, and other liquidity management features.N/A
Treasury Systems
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Treasury Systems is a treasury management system developed with modern technologies available in a cloud-first architecture setup. Built to be intuitive and proactive - a service designed around the user to increase efficiency throughout the treasury value chain. Highlighted features: Intuitive and modern UX/UI Proactive widgets ensure key tasks are completed Always-on Risk Management Autopilot for automation of multiple system…N/A
Pricing
GTreasuryTreasury Systems
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GTreasuryTreasury Systems
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GTreasuryTreasury Systems
User Ratings
GTreasuryTreasury Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GTreasuryTreasury Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well-suited for providing information about what cash is available and its future outlook of it. It helped us to link the multiple bank accounts that we have globally into one consolidated location. We were then able to ensure that we had the cash required to meet the various business needs that we have.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Reporting automates bank balance view(s) by sending daily email recipients.
  • [It] includes the GL account coding on the funding templates to automate the posting of JEs for that transaction.
  • [It] synergizes bank transactions via a single portal rather than multiple logins for multiple bank platforms.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • IHB should be created as a separate module and not be spread out across multiple functions
  • CAMT script that is currently used should be replaced by an actual plugin
  • Reporting module needs to be more user friendly and allow users to extract larger data sets
  • An ability to view a bank statement on-screen w/o extracting it into PDF would go a long way. Different from Balance Explorer.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
[I feel] it's too hard to use and navigate around [and] very difficult to manage/administer. We may keep it because [I feel] we [have] already gone through the pain point and don't want to risk going through that again. Unfortunately, if we keep it, [I believe] it's not because we love it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
For me, reporting is very important and I just don't find it very user-friendly. [To me,] the location of certain functions is also confusing which I resort to using the search function. [In my case,] I have had two conversations with two different people in GTreasury and they both also agreed with me on this. They also said to just use the search function. [I believe] a lot of the reporting areas could be updated and made better. [I feel that] unless you have had a lot of training, a user would have a very hard time customizing reports. [In my experience,] even GTreasury employees agreed with me on this one.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Day-to-day support is very quick and responsive. However, if you need to go the second level it might take longer and you lose the visibility.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Weekly meetings and updates a plus Set realistic timeline expectations Have a good project manager Make sure everyone is following the same time line and dependencies list Keep track of a future state or out of scope list You may need to change the scope and do a project request form change, that's OK if you determine a key function has been missed Don't be afraid to extend the timeline to make sure through testing has been done prior to going live Document set up decisions, how reports and worksheets work, and why certain user codes are or are not in the positioning reports.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have used Orbit and Kyriba in the past. Orbit from [a] previous company. It was fairly user-friendly even though it does not have all the bells and whistles. What I liked most about Orbit is the customer service. Everyone was very responsive. We chose GTreasury because we all agreed it appears to have everything we needed. The demos we received looked great and looked easy to use. The reporting function seemed very robust. The account manager assigned to us at the time, Jake, was great. He was very responsive and helpful. His responsiveness was also one of the reasons why we probably went with GTreasury because we felt like we had someone advocating for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Very positive ROI allowing us to take our daily cash target down to 1% of total admitted Assts. Prior to GTreasury we were running close to 20%.
  • Reduced bank service cost initially by $300,000+ and annually a minimum of $50,000.
  • Allowed us to maintain and streamline Treasury Staff FTE level, with the ability to train other areas for self service payment research, so the Treasury Analyst can focus on value added analysis tasks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Treasury Systems Screenshots

Screenshot of Treasury Systems with integrated Power BI Dashboards