HackerEarth Assessments vs. HackerRank

HackerEarth Assessments excels in technical hiring with coding challenges. It's ideal for roles emphasizing coding proficiency and remote recruitment, yet may be less fitting for positions requiring strong non-technical skills like communication and collaboration.

Incentivized

I think HackerRank is very good for companies who have many candidates applying for specific coding related roles and they do not have time to interview all of them for the positions. It is a quick and easy way to screen out candidates before moving on to interviews. In situations where there are less qualified candidates for a role, or if the role is more specialized, it may be better to use another method than HackerRank.

Incentivized

• we can design assessment tests using almost all programming languages.
• We can create customized test cases for a given assessment test.
• It is very economical to our organization.

Incentivized

• Practicing programming using programming language of your choice
• Competitive programming with ranking, weekly/monthly challenges
• Certificates to prove & verify using practical problem solving skills of a developer

• The Pricing is good for mid-size companies, but for a growing startup, it can be a bit high. Maybe they can introduce startup-friendly plans.
• The Library of the questionnaire can be improved and updated as its long time since it has been revisited.

Incentivized

• Increase the content
• Introduce a job portal
• Have live classes

Incentivized

Here's the things that HackerEarth Assessments has which makes it a perfect choice against it's competitors -

• Ease of access
• Great User Experience
• Well Established process
• Developer-friendly IDE & Test platform
• Excellent support

Incentivized

I didn't use any other products apart from Hackerrank.

Incentivized

• 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews.
• Approximately 3 employees' worth of manpower is saved.
• The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts.

• 63% Improvement over streamlined Hiring.
• More Suitable Candidates.
• Shortlisting time saved by over 57%.