Harver vs. McGraw-Hill Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Harver
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Harver, now including OutMatch, which merged with Harver in 2021, is a hiring solution that automates recruitment processes from apply to hire.N/A
McGraw-Hill Connect
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
McGraw-Hill Connect is an e-learning platform offered by McGraw-Hill Education. Features include course and assignment creation, grading, learning aides, e-books, and student portals.N/A
Pricing
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Considered Both Products
Harver
Chose Harver
Harver vs. Goodhire:They are efficient platforms, easy to use, offer resume evaluation tools, selection tests, candidate evaluations, etc. Harver offers great options like video interviews, which can be easily recorded and shared.
One big difference between the two platforms is …
Chose Harver
I've been with the company for 6 years and we have always used OutMatch so I don't really have anything to compare to
Chose Harver
I have not used any other competitor products.
McGraw-Hill Connect
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
Very similar, both advertised integration with LMS, but is only at surface level. MGH had better core content, but Pearson came with test editor. As far as physical materials, MGH had options for hard coverer textbook or single use student workbook where competitors only …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill provides a higher level of customer support and value me as a customer/user of their product
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
One of the main reasons why our school chose McGraw-Hill Connect is its reputability and wide-spread popularity of one of its programs (ALEKS) among many mathematics educators. It works well, it connects to our district's Learning Management System, it differentiates, it's …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill Connect is certainly more robust and easier to use than Pearson systems, and more developed than everyday math.
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
Integration with Canvas and ease of use are the two strong points for McGraw-Hill Connect. Pearson Revel has many issues at the start of the semester and takes a long time to resolve those. McGraw-Hill Connect has never been down for the start of our semester. MindTap is not …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
It has everything our students need for them to be successful. They are always available to answer any questions or concerns that might arise.
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill is the most user-friendly and teacher-friendly for students and teachers. McGraw-Hill provided the online portion of learning that helped teachers provide the resources to students that were needed. Additionally, even though McGraw-Hill is wordy in its descriptions …
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill Connect does a great job being user friendly and has relevant tasks and activities for what needs to be taught. Blackboard does a good job being used as a communication and quiz board and Cengage operates based on activities similar to Connect.
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
I chose McGraw-Hill because of the materials offered (specific texts). I have not compared to other products.
Chose McGraw-Hill Connect
Much of our lecture material comes from McGraw-Hill, so it was an opportunity to marry the learning material to a collaborative system that can make the experience more portable and potentially more affordable for our students. The workings are managed off-site so we do not …
Best Alternatives
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Small Businesses
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HarverMcGraw-Hill Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
The tool is easy to use and the reference reports has allowed us to move from 2 references at the end of the recruitment process to collecting 5+ references earlier in the recruitment piece, thus allowing us to have better insight into the applicant and being able to tailor our interviews to questions that arise from the references. We have also seen a hirer retention rate of employees who have undertaken Outmatch references compared to those who have had verbal references. The references are in an easy-to-read format and the candidate sourcing database has added to our candidate attraction pool.
Read full review
Content is pretty good, and site is good as standalone tool, but it does not integrate will with any LMS. Grade pass back does not work with Google Classroom or Skyward (unsure about Power School or others) SSO works with Clever, but not Google, so students always have to go through Clever and cannot go directly from Google Classroom to an assignment, even if you posted to Google Classroom through the Connect portal. Problem sets are robust, but difficult to edit and assessments are designed to be web based. Formatting is poor when trying to print assessments that were created online.
Read full review
Pros
  • They provide accurate candidate data.
  • Facilitates hiring decisions.
  • I can conduct video interviews.
  • Integrates with the following applications: Connexys Recruiting Software, Jobvite, SmartRecruiters, TalentSoft, etc.
Read full review
  • Integration with Canvas is seamless and easy to use.
  • Assignment completion, for students, is straightforward and easy to use.
  • The SmartBook allows students to read as they are tested with questions and this helps them learn the material easily without having first trying to read, memorize a chapter and then answer questions.
Read full review
Cons
  • Customer Service initially was poor, but we now have a good account manager. However, compared to Checkster, (outmatch acquired) there is a clear service level difference.
Read full review
  • McGraw-Hill Connect could do a better job of staying current and making sure all of its videos and references to real-scenarios are up to date.
  • It can do a better job of immediate explanation or advice when an answer is incorrect.
  • It can improve upon its ability to autosave assignments. If an internet connection gets buggy and kicks the user out of the system, sometimes the assignment progress will be lost. This is because to save the assignment, it takes you out of the assignment and doesn't just autosave.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The product will do a majority of what they claim. Your experience will vary depending on how much you love or hate the implementation. The tools are there, but there is a learning curve as people get accommodated to how interaction is expected to be conducted (as opposed to more personal means).
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Personally, I did not encounter McGraw-Hill support. However, I worked with colleagues who needed support and were able to receive in a timely manner. Overall, McGraw Hill Connect is user-friendly (at least from teacher interface) and easy to navigate, which minimizes the need to reach out for support. The help button is useful and provides plenty of immediate support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Harver vs. GoodHire:They are efficient platforms, easy to use, offer resume evaluation tools, selection tests, candidate evaluations, etc. Harver offers great options like video interviews, which can be easily recorded and shared. One big difference between the two platforms is that Harver offers internal collaboration and candidate experience evaluation tools, while GoodHire focuses on background checks.
Read full review
Much of our lecture material comes from McGraw-Hill, so it was an opportunity to marry the learning material to a collaborative system that can make the experience more portable and potentially more affordable for our students. The workings are managed off-site so we do not need to care for it on a daily basis.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • First, Harver helps streamline each hiring process, reducing the time and effort required to find the right candidate for each available position.
  • Second, it allows us to easily track and manage candidate data such as skills, experience, etc.
  • Third, it is affordable in terms of payments.
Read full review
  • Wasted valuable time trying to figure out the "eBook."
  • Did not receive good value for the money spent.
  • Did not feel as though the company was interested in keeping me satisfied as a customer, or like their customer service was actually interested in solving any problems.
Read full review
ScreenShots