HCL AppScan vs. Veracode

HCL AppScan

23 Reviews and Ratings

Veracode

213 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
HCL AppScan	Score5.1 out of 10	N/A	AppScan (formerly Rational AppScan) is an application security testing solution acquired by HCL Technologies from IBM in late 2018. Appscan supports both dynamic (DAST) and static (SAST) application security testing.	N/A
Veracode	Score8.7 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.	N/A

Pricing

HCL AppScan

Veracode

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
HCL AppScan	Veracode
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

Developer pricing options available

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	HCL AppScan	Veracode
Considered Both Products	HCLSoftware Sanjana Gupta Internet Marketing Manager in Marketing at PyramidX (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose HCL AppScan When we used Veracode, it takes a-lot of time to run a source code analysis. It's user interface is also bit clumsy. So we switched to HCL AppScan. It enables enterprises to scan internal and external applications for vulnerabilities. It provides quick and easy access to the … Incentivized Helpful? Seth Shestack Executive Director, Deputy CISO in Information Technology at Temple University (Higher Education, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose HCL AppScan We have been using AppScan for about 14 years (Before it was acquired by IBM). A few years ago we did an upgrade from the standard edition to the enterprise edition (to allow several users at once) in order to accommodate the growth of our team. Prior to this upgrade we looked … Incentivized Helpful?	Veracode Verified User Chose Veracode Veracode stands out as the best of breed for all types of AppSec scanners. Incentivized Helpful? VENKITESH SUBRAMONIAN Senior Manager in Information Technology at NISSAN (Automotive, 10,001+ employees) Chose Veracode None Incentivized Helpful? Mauricio Giraldo Applications and Cloud Security Architect at ServiceMaster (Consumer Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Veracode Veracode is a solution easy to set up and integrate with virtually any pipeline--a single product for three solutions. Incentivized Helpful? George Garza Director Security and Risk Manhattan Active™ Solutions in Research & Development at Manhattan Associates (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Veracode Software as a service is a key factor. Programs are easy to establish and quick to ramp up. Low false positive rates means lower engineer fatigue and frustration. Data path exposure makes resolution obvious and easier. Other providers tend to sell technology and many times … Incentivized Helpful? Christopher Sawyer Programmer Analyst in Information Technology at TCDRS (Investment Management, 51-200 employees) Chose Veracode I used AppScan for dynamic scanning when it was IBM, but it was too clunky and hard to use. Developers and testers needed to spend quite a bit of time configuring scans. I also used Checkmarx for static scanning and it was faster, but it requires you to install on your own … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	HCL AppScan	Veracode
Likelihood to Recommend	8.3 (6 ratings)	8.6 (138 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (8 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (27 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	6.4 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (67 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (3 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	6.4 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	5.5 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.9 (2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (1 ratings)