HENO vs. Practice Fusion

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HENO
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
HENO is a cloud-based medical practice management software for physical therapy practices from the company of the same name in Orlando, designed to help practice owners have a clear, concise system for knowing every detail of revenue, productivity, marketing, billing, and patient care at the click of a button.N/A
Practice Fusion
Score 2.4 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
Pricing
HENOPractice Fusion
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
3 signing staff licenses & unlimited non-signing staff licenses
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HENOPractice Fusion
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HENOPractice Fusion
Considered Both Products
HENO
Practice Fusion
Chose Practice Fusion
I think it came down to cost, which I regret now.
Chose Practice Fusion
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, …
Chose Practice Fusion
It wasn't really a choice for me- I used the chiropractic specific when working for chiropractors and then used Practice Fusion while I was working for an alternative healthcare doctor.
The doctors all had chosen the software before signing me on, there wasn't really an option …
Chose Practice Fusion
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
Chose Practice Fusion
Practice fusion is much more user friendly than the other programs that we have used. The more costly EMR's were definitely no better and the ones we have used were not nearly as easy to use. I would highly recommend practice fusion over Athena or Allscripts.
Chose Practice Fusion
I personally would recommend Cerner over all other EMRs due to the ability to customize and navigate through the system.
Features
HENOPractice Fusion
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
HENO
-
Ratings
Practice Fusion
8.2
Ratings
8% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Claims management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Coding00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Patient billing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
HENO
-
Ratings
Practice Fusion
5.2
Ratings
41% below category average
Rule-based scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Multi-location support00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Calendar interface00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
HENO
-
Ratings
Practice Fusion
6.4
Ratings
13% below category average
Charting / document management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Templates00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Patient portal00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Fax integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Workflow automation00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Speech recognition00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customization00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
E-prescribing00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
HENO
-
Ratings
Practice Fusion
7.2
Ratings
15% below category average
HIPAA compliance00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
HENO
-
Ratings
Practice Fusion
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Task tracking00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HENOPractice Fusion
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HENOPractice Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HENOPractice Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
HENO is a wonderful system for any Physical Therapy practice currently operating in multiple programs. It streamlines systems and communication through its department integration, allows for HIPAA compliant internal messaging, and client communication, and it has a high level of practice customization. It also has a patient portal which can be very useful.
Read full review
I think this is a great tool for a smaller practice, and I really like that it is not practice-specific. It seems like any type of doctor could use the site. I also think this is really great for remote workers because you are able to log on via the internet. I think that this tool would not be good for those looking to have a specific practice software. I've worked for other doctors alongside the one I used practice fusion for, and the other doctors used specialty specific software because of the customization to their job and charting.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integrates as a whole
  • 1 log in- 1 log in!!! that is all!
  • Everything in one
  • Cuts down time and energy
Read full review
  • Organizes lab work for each patient. Its helpful for us to see a patient at a glance.
  • Schedule appointments for patients.
Read full review
Cons
  • Tracking of appointments, and documentation could be cleaner.
  • Alerts could be more customizable, and error messages could provide more information to the user.
Read full review
  • One of the biggest frustrations is that PF only imports PDFs of lab results, but does nothing to allow manipulation of the numbers within these PDFs. I can pull up lab results but can't look at a graph, for example, of trends in serum sodium or hematocrit.
  • Like EPIC, it would be nice to have an option like scrolling to all the "***"s using F2, which I always try to do on PF until I realize it does not work.
  • I wish PF had more dot phrases to pull in things like lab results, etc., into the note. Since I cannot copy and paste lab results (which are stored in PDF) or blow them in with a dot phrase, I have to manually re-write them, which leaves our notes more vulnerable to human error. If this feature DOES exist, it isn't obvious to me or anyone in our clinic.
  • It would be really nice to hear from PF support to see if we had any unmet needs in the clinic so that they could educate us on how to better use this EMR to support those needs.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
In my opinion and experience, they have a lack of customization so you have to constantly create hacks to make their system work for your practice.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are great about getting back to us, however, sometimes it is hard to convey the question accurately through email.
Read full review
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
HENO is a single system, and I find that invaluable.
Read full review
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, visits to other health facilities, and past notes. It also had so many more ways you could format your notes, blow in data, and statistically analyze data. While EPIC is a much more comprehensive and well-supported EMR, it also would be too heavy and unnecessary for the small scale clinic work I do at a community clinic. I feel that each EMR has the environment they are well-suited for, and I am glad to be using PF now.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has had positive impact overall by making most of our systems more efficient and streamlined.
Read full review
  • PRO -- I know now what I need in an EMR/EHR
  • CONS -- They have overcharged me and it has cost me money
  • CONS-- They have disregarded my legal rights which makes me unsure of keeping confidential info in their systems and it will cost me money to switch
  • CONS--They have cost me money with the time I've wasted to follow up on my own tickets that they refuse to follow up with
Read full review
ScreenShots