HiredScore vs. TurboHire

A great alternative in the market to use for recruitment. It is really very helpful for the leadership team to track and find the right resources. It can be integrated with another page also. Provides flexible connectivity. Includes simple process. So good at keeping candidate details in the database, their experience also.

Incentivized

• User friendly User Interface
• Cost effective
• making pipeline of candidates in a great way.

Incentivized

• While adding a resume in the ATS, very often the resume is not read and had to re do it. It sometimes ask to put the resume in a particular format which is annoying.
• Turbohire is missing one major feature of detailed reports of the candidates. The weekly and monthly reports really helps in keeping a track on the pipeline and performance, which should be added.
• Sometimes it won't show a candidate while searching from emailid or mobile number, which creates duplicity.

Incentivized

The major decisive factors for us when we were looking for an ATS were cost and easy to use ATS as we were in the transition phase. Turbohire was cheaper and had easy user interface and didn't require any additional trainings on using ATS. The demo given by Turbohire was enough to understand its functions.

Incentivized

• Turbohire is relatively cheaper comparing to other few similar software available in the market.
• It's cost effective ATS to start with and to get shifted to an ATS from traditional methods of Excel or sheets.
• Pretty simple to use, so the transition is really smooth and hassle free.
• Overall Turbohire is having positive impact on ROI, advisable for small and medium sized companies.

Incentivized