Hive vs. InEight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hive
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Hive Technology offers their eponymous project management and process management application, providing integrations with many popularly used applications for productivity, cloud storage, and collaboration.
$0
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
InEight's modular project controls software connects complex project data to improve visibility and delivery in capital construction.N/A
Pricing
HiveInEight
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Lite
$24
per month per user
Growth
$34
per month per user
Pro
$59
per month per user
Elite
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HiveInEight
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsA discount is offered for annual pricing.InEight offers a modular, integrated project controls platform. Because the InEight platform covers the entire construction lifecycle, customers purchase the software based on their specific needs – purchasing stand-alone products, a bundle of products, or the entire platform. As a result, the pricing will vary depending on the specific product, number of users and length of contract. Once InEight has identified the highest impact areas, they offer potential customers a custom proposal. The options they consider include: Per user pricing: typically annual subscriptions. Revenue-based: using a percentage of the customer’s revenue. Project-based: software use dedicated to a specific project or program of work.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HiveInEight
Considered Both Products
Hive
Chose Hive
In my experience, Hive is better for the work and not so good for financial. That's why we use monday.
Chose Hive
One key difference between Hive and Spark is the way they process data. Hive is a batch-oriented system, which means that it is designed to process large amounts of data in a batch mode rather than in real-time.
In contrast, Spark is a real-time processing platform that is …
Chose Hive
Hive's layout was much smoother and nicer to use.
Chose Hive
More user-friendly. Able to quickly get users adopted and utilizing the platform versus Planview. More intuitive, especially for the user that is not familiar with project management software. This platform was built for everyday users.
Chose Hive
Hive is a bit different than Jira and Monday, which I used mostly. Overall does a great job managing project and helps with team communication. Removes dependency of asking team members for updates by going to conference rooms. With Hive, the team updates the status, and we …
Chose Hive
Hive did what these other tools do. It has Kanban boards, Gantt views, timeline views, reporting, task management, and file uploads. While it is not as feature rich at the lowest subscription level as some of these others, its interface is quite a bit less overwhelming than say …
Chose Hive
  1. Easier to deploy
  2. Better UI/UX
  3. Easy to customize
Chose Hive
Hive for me felt more complex and granular in comparison to other competitors which was a good thing. I enjoyed the layout of viewing projects, the way it integrated timesheets, resourcing, and budgets together, and worked really well to help track episodes and projects.
For …
Chose Hive
So far Hive is the total package for our needs. Offering request forms and proofing/approval out of the box without third party integrations has been a huge upgrade for us along with incredibly reasonable pricing. The support for onboarding has been fantastic and we haven't …
Chose Hive
I would say that in comparison to Asana, Hive is a better interface an UI. I think Asana is more robust in terms of what it can do in conjunction with Confluence but I think Hive is a better entry-level model for new employees. Hive is much simpler and more straight forward and …
Chose Hive
I like Hive better than Trello. Hive is definitely more user-friendly, but Trello had nice shortcuts that I miss in Hive. I would like to organize my board with just one click.
InEight
Chose InEight
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do.
Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight …
Chose InEight
InEight seems to be an improvement on SAP BPC, though I haven't used SAP BPC for invoice processing, But in terms of planning, forecasting, budgeting and variance analysis. InEight has an edge because it is mor user friendly and the data you get is more streamlined and fit for …
Chose InEight
InEight has been the first product that I have used and I wouldn't change it. Coming up from a hand to staff it has made my job easier to perform. Easier to keep track of quantities, hours, production being made throughout the project and makes it easier to access work plans …
Chose InEight
The two items that set InEight apart was the estimating module with the ability to track cost to the exact estimate line item and the ability to export manhours to payroll. The other software's were either lacking or deficient in these items.
Chose InEight
InEight Estimate integrated with SAP much easier and the overall GUI was much nicer. easy decision
Chose InEight
Both Sage Estimating and InEight programs have their unique capabilities. Sage Estimating is much more configured for use in detailed construction, the majority of which are for non-nuclear projects. InEight has so many more capabilities, especially in creating our own …
Chose InEight
We've evaluated the project controls functions, but they aren't as functional as InEight Estimate
Chose InEight
InEight is perfect for our work in Heavy Civil construction. Some of the other products are designed for different workflows and industries. We chose InEight specifically because it was related to the construction industry. Procore is incredibly comprehensive, and we just don't …
Chose InEight
InEight provides the tools that my business needs and its programs are geared troward the industry.
Chose InEight
We looked at HCSS and Bid 2 Win but chose Ineight due to the fact that it seemed more user friendly, plus I had used it at a former company when it was available from the Grantlun Corporation and was very familiar with it in its ease of use and reliability.
Chose InEight
No others were evaluated at this time
Chose InEight
heavy bid is okay for bid item work and has a few things in the quote folder screen that are nice and user friendly but the ability to tag is not as useful.
Chose InEight
InEight is more robust than the other services I have used. I think it does a better job of rolling up a massive amount of individual user data into one complete project progress report. I like that most of our clients also use it, which makes collaboration easier. I think it …
Chose InEight
InEight exceeded our expectations from [the] capability to cost. This product selection was a no-brainer for our department.
Chose InEight
Ecosys is used for project management reporting while InEight is used for document management.
Chose InEight
InEight is cheaper than both. It is more functional than Aconex, but not iTWO. InEight's GUI needs the most work to improve.
Chose InEight
I would prefer Aconex but the cost is too high. The overall layout and feel of Aconex are modern compared to InEight.
Chose InEight
  1. Allows you to save all file types to a document, easily identify which formats you do and don’t have and manage which formats you issue.
  2. Great bulk functionality. Manage multiple projects and large volume of documentation easily with less staff.
Chose InEight
As an issuing tool, InEight's TeamBinder is on par with Aconex. Solidworks EPDM creation of review workflows and revision numbering is better placed with handling multiple versions of the same document with the ability to revert to older versions if required. InEight's support …
Chose InEight
I have used Aconnex and have found InEight to be more flexible and works in partnership with us to provide the best solution.
Chose InEight
InEight has superior functionality over all of these systems.
Features
HiveInEight
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Hive
7.5
Ratings
2% below category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Task Management8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Hive
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Hive
-
Ratings
InEight
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Hive
-
Ratings
InEight
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Checklists00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Meeting Minutes00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Hive
-
Ratings
InEight
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Takeoff tools00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Job costing00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost databases00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Cost calculator00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Bid creation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HiveInEight
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HiveInEight
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HiveInEight
Likelihood to Recommend
Hive is great for managing projects with your team. Assigning tasks is simple enough using Hive. It helps manage team goals for the projects. We are able to create reports (via the dashboard) for the progress and updates to provide to the team based on completed stages. Works great for bigger projects.
Read full review
Compared to other Estimating software I have used, InEight has superior capabilities and features. The ability to use a line item or an assembly to create an estimate is an outstanding feature of the program. The ability to create crew rates and use them in the estimate is a handy feature, especially when estimating construction projects.
Read full review
Pros
  • Data warehousing: Hive is often used as a data warehousing platform, allowing users to store and analyze large amounts of structured and semi-structured data. It is especially good at handling data that is too large to be stored and analyzed on a single machine, and supports a wide variety of data formats.
  • Batch processing: Hive is designed for batch processing of large datasets, making it well-suited for tasks such as data ETL (extract, transform, load), data cleansing, and data aggregation.
  • Data transformation: Hive allows users to perform data transformations and manipulations using custom scripts written in Java, Python, or other programming languages. This can be useful for tasks such as data cleansing, data aggregation, and data transformation.
  • Integration with other tools: Hive integrates with a wide variety of other tools and services in the Hadoop ecosystem, such as Pig, Spark, and HBase, allowing users to perform a wide range of data analysis and management tasks.
Read full review
  • Tracking labor and equipment hours to specific estimated scope line items
  • Creating detailed work breakdown structures within Estimate and using that same structure to apply cost to during the job
  • Creating custom data blocks in control to track progress and create forecasts
Read full review
Cons
  • Organizing tasks by assignees could be better. It's a little cumbersome to check off each person you want. Can you group these?
  • I don't really use any view besides task view. Is there something better I could be using?
  • It would be nice if attachments showed up in a nicer format, maybe with a preview?
Read full review
  • We do not use the search engine since it was last modified. It is no longer user friendly.
  • We used to like the way we could change the position of line items. The function has been changed to where it is not user friendly anymore.
  • The "Save" and "Delete" options are right next to each other. I have been after Ineight to change these for a long time but they have not.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Some features with InEight's TeamBinder are worthy of single use, however the review feature and subsequent revision and version numbering could be improved. We will be aiming to roll out the package to encompass our internal documentation in the near future and will be in a better position to judge the usability after that point in time.
Read full review
Usability
Its a easy tool, the best way to organize the workflow but has room for more improvements.
Read full review
I would give it an 8 out of 10 because the software can be a bit cumbersome to new users. It also takes a long time to set up the library and input all of your companies needs so that the software will provide the level of service required to estimate projects. However, once the software is set up it is a powerful tool. We only use a portion of what the software is capable of delivering
Read full review
Support Rating
Our CSR is easily accessible and they have support built into the app itself. They also have a pretty robust support site. We also took advantage of the free trial and learned so much by putting Hive through the paces and figuring out the best way to mold it to our needs.
Read full review
Every time I have contacted support, they have gotten back to [me] quickly and with a few solutions. I like that they seem to be US-based, so there is no language barrier when I try to communicate my problem. For the few times, they did not have a solution ready, they told me they would respond later after further research, and they actually followed up! Better than most support I have used in the past with other software.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Since the original inception, I have been required to overhaul the system so that it is more user friendly and combines both aspects of our business, documentation and drawings. Being able to control revision and version numbering has been a key struggle that only staff training has been able to mark this as complete.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
One key difference between Hive and Spark is the way they process data. Hive is a batch-oriented system, which means that it is designed to process large amounts of data in a batch mode rather than in real-time. In contrast, Spark is a real-time processing platform that is designed to handle streaming data and support interactive queries. Another difference is the way they execute queries. Hive uses a SQL-like query language called HiveQL, while Spark supports a wide range of languages and APIs, including SQL, Python, Scala, and R. But we chose Hive due to its simple queries on large datasets and for data warehousing tasks.
Read full review
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do. Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight would be able to do whatever that COINS does, but what I'm trying to say is that, for systems, as much less external communication, better. InEight is covering a great portion on planning, we will see schedule and estimate, it will definitely improve, so, waiting on that to see.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
InEight is a good system that has scaled nicely as the company has grown. the tools are still readily available and applicable for our larger scope of work. It has kept up with the growth of the company very nicely
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I've gotten to know my colleagues better, knowing their roles makes it faster to contact them to complete tasks and that speed makes us optimize and earn better results
  • The jobs speed made us focus on optimization and customization for the client, and that in a better treatment by the client and better revenue
  • We can understand which tasks takes more time and to stimate better what we can ask for
Read full review
  • We have gone from an $6.5M per year company to over $10M per year since integrating InEight in 2018
  • Job costing has really helped us to understand where the money is going and how to manage it better.
  • Being able to compare different estimates has sped up the estimation process and allowed us to be more competitive.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hive Screenshots

Screenshot of HIver Technology

InEight Screenshots

Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s Benchmarking feature, which allows users to compare high, low, and average costs, as well as productivity rates from past projects, to visually assess whether current estimates fall within a realistic range. With historical performance data at their fingertips, estimators can bid more strategically and deliver more reliable, data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s CBS Register, which provides a user-specific view of an estimate, allowing users to create unlimited WBS structures and custom rollups. With parametric cost item assemblies, estimators can generate more accurate, reliable, and data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Dashboard, that delivers a centralized, visual view of project information across all modules. Interactive dashboard tiles make it easy to track document activity and maintain visibility into project performance.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Gallery, which offers a comprehensive visual library of all project-related files—including drawings, photos, and documents—so teams can quickly access and manage the content they need from one intuitive location.Screenshot of InEight Schedule’s Risk Management feature, which enables project teams to evaluate schedules through a risk-adjusted lens. By visualizing scenarios with varying confidence levels, teams can anticipate potential impacts and plan with greater certainty.Screenshot of InEight Change’s PCO Summary dashboard that delivers a visual summary of all potential change orders. This helps project teams evaluate impacts, track approvals, and manage changes proactively for better cost and scope control.