HPE 3PAR StoreServ

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

29 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	Score8.1 out of 10	N/A	HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a flash storage option, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.	N/A

Pricing

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Considered Both Products	Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Shawn Karr IT Infrastructure Engineer in Information Technology at Advanced Pharmacy (Pharmaceuticals, 1001-5000 employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ We evaluated the Nimble all-flash array as a competitor of the HPE 3PAR. During the evaluation, not only did the unit under-perform to the 3PAR, but Nimble was also acquired by HPE. We feel Nimble is a great product, but the 3PAR 8200 is a better fit in relation to our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ Cost effective and a very good customer support. Incentivized Helpful? Jane Updegraff Senior Systems Administrator in Information Technology at DRT Holdings, Inc. (Aviation & Aerospace, 501-1000 employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ We still use NetApp storage enclosures at each plant for our routine file shares (CIFS) but I would love to swap them out for the HPE 3PARs as we use for our ERP app data. The 3PARS are simply faster and much better at near-instant replication. But even more importantly we can … Incentivized Helpful? Mario Jost System Engineer in Information Technology at Mercedes Benz Automobil AG (Automotive, 1001-5000 employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ HP 3PAR does Inline dedup, and provides storage snapshots and automated failover (though this needs to be scripted with NetApp). Incentivized Helpful? Andrew Bouwhuis Network System Administrator in Legal at LANprofessionals (Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ By comparison, I would pick DataCore because it's far more flexible to work with and I think less costly. We only went with HP because we didn't know about DataCore and because other persons where we work wanted the HP name. Incentivized Helpful? Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services in Information Technology at University of Southern California (Higher Education, 10,001+ employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ We also considered NetApp All-Flash FAS since it works on similar technology and provides comparable throughput. However, we were offered better deal from HPE as we are existing customers for HPE, hence we chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ. Incentivized Helpful? Ravinder Gupta Senior Oracle Database Administrator in Information Technology at CGI (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ NetApp does not have RDMA capabilities in CIFS (SMB) and NFS protocols. Also, NetApp All Flash FAS has no direct storage attachment available. Most configurations require additional switches for data access. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ The 3PAR is faster, easier to use, takes up less space and is much easier to expand than a VMAX system. We compared the 3PAR head to head against XtremIO and Compellent and chose the 3PAR for its combination of performance, features and price (Compellent was cheaper, but did … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Likelihood to Recommend	9.2 (8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (3 ratings)