TrustRadius

HPE Serviceguard vs. NetApp MetroCluster

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Serviceguard
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
HPE Serviceguard is a high availability clustering solution, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
NetApp MetroCluster
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
NetApp MetroCluster software is a solution that combines array-based clustering with synchronous replication to deliver continuous availability and zero data loss at the lowest cost. The vendor states administration of the array-based cluster is simpler because the dependencies and complexity normally associated with hostbased clustering are eliminated. MetroCluster immediately duplicates mission-critical data on a transaction-by-transaction basis, providing uninterrupted access to applications…N/A
Pricing
HPE ServiceguardNetApp MetroCluster
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE ServiceguardNetApp MetroCluster
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE ServiceguardNetApp MetroCluster
User Ratings
HPE ServiceguardNetApp MetroCluster
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE ServiceguardNetApp MetroCluster
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
NetApp
NetApp MetroCluster is suited for applications which require 100% uptime with no data loss. It is suitable for organizations who have the need to move their NAS services and workloads to another data center with minimal downtime and configuration. Due to the cost of the product, it is not well suited for NAS file shares that require greater than zero RPO and RTO's. NetApp asynchronous is better suited for this type of data.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
NetApp
  • Data deduplication, compression, and compaction provide great savings compared to traditional host based storage
  • Multiprotocol support (NAS and SAN) provide great flexibility
  • Ability to easily run your workloads from either data center with minimal effort and no disruption was the key selling point
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
NetApp
  • I would like to see more highly intelligent monitoring that can help determine where latency is coming from. Eg. Host, Array, Network or Fabric issues
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
NetApp
Have not used or evaluated any other NAS synchronous products.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
NetApp
  • By moving critical application data away from older based technology such as host based mirroring and to a centralized array based replication, the complexity of managing data from multiple source and destination servers has been removed.
  • The number of incidents compared to our previous legacy configuration is huge. Data uptime has been 100% available since the migration to NetApp MetroCluster.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots