Hugo Framework vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Hugo Framework

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Hugo Framework	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Hugo is an open-source static site generators boasting speed and flexibility, available on the Apache 2.0 license. It’s written in Go (aka Golang) and can be installed on macOS, Windows, Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and on any machine where the Go compiler tool chain can run. Hugo provides a theming system that is presented as easy to implement but capable of producing even the most complicated websites. Hugo's Go-based templating provides the right amount of logic to build anything from the simple…	N/A
Red Hat JBoss EAP	Score 7.4 out of 10	N/A	N/A	N/A

Pricing

Hugo Framework

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Hugo Framework	Red Hat JBoss EAP
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Hugo Framework	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Considered Both Products	Hugo Framework No answer on this topic	Red Hat JBoss EAP Holman Cárdenas, M.Eng, TOGAF®, ITIL® CIO (Chief Information Officer) Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP We did not evaluate other products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat. Incentivized Helpful? Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over Websphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP We decided to use Red Hat JBoss EAP as it lowers our overall cost, supports all the features that we are looking for including clustering, distributed caching and web services. JBoss EAP is modular and has cloud-ready architecture. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP JBoss does practically everything Apache Tomcat and Weblogic does in terms of our requirements, but JBoss is more suited for larger enterprise J2EE apps compared to Tomcat. Boot time is not as quick as Tomcat, but still relatively fast for our deployments. The system can also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP Pricing is great and very easy to use Incentivized Helpful? Josh Araya, PMP Project Manager Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP none that i know of for exactly what redhat jboss EAP does. Incentivized Helpful? sameer vaidya Software Developer IV Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP Jboss supports JEE standards and provides features like high availability, clustering, hot deployments, configurable features. you can quickly add or remove needed features and cut jboss footprint and reduce boot time. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Hugo Framework

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Application Servers

Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
	Hugo Framework - Ratings	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.6 Ratings 8% above category average
IDE support	00 Ratings	8.10 Ratings
Security management	00 Ratings	8.60 Ratings
Administration and management	00 Ratings	8.10 Ratings
Application server performance	00 Ratings	8.60 Ratings
Installation	00 Ratings	9.50 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance	00 Ratings	8.60 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Hugo Framework	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Small Businesses	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Hugo Framework	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.5 (0 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	5.2 (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	8.5 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Hugo Framework	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is well suited for deploying high transaction Java EE based applications. It supports many popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments. Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc. Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks. JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc. Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop Incentivized sameer vaidya Software Developer IV Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Performance	No answers on this topic	We run a high traffic B2B application on JBoss and it is very stable. Boot time when restarting services is also fast Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Fast response. Incentivized Holman Cárdenas, M.Eng, TOGAF®, ITIL® CIO (Chief Information Officer) Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires less server resource Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery. Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations. Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review
ScreenShots