ibi WebFOCUS vs. Cyfe, by Traject

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ibi WebFOCUS
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The ibi™ WebFOCUS® product is an enterprise business intelligence and analytics solution equipped with data management, visual discovery, predictive analytics, and visualizations. Combining these capabilities and data science in one unified containerized platform, the WebFOCUS® solution can be used to make data-driven decisions across the enterprise and provide reports, dashboards, and customer-facing applications at scale.N/A
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Cyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.
$29
per month
Pricing
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$29
per month
Standard
$39
per month
Pro
$65
per month
Premier
$119
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
Considered Both Products
ibi WebFOCUS
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Above average. Feature wise [Information Builders WebFOCUS] stands out. User friendliness is OK. It can handle the most complex tasks and its extensions with for example R make it extremely versatile. Support is lagging in western Europe, although i am more than happy with …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
We've looked at Tableau as an alternative and the visuals are good in Tableau. One way that WebFOCUS beats Tableau is it doesn't have any issues with a set number of columns in a report. When you need to have an Excel output, which happens, WebFOCUS is far superior. The …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Webfocus handles the side of our business that is involved with our catalogs. Our catalogs is a huge revenue driver for us and this tool has been extremely useful with planning feature catalogs. Tableau is used more for marketing and merchandising purchases since we can filter …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
No comparison. Both have their strengths, but WebFocus comes out on top as the clear winner because it is so easy to use and understand for power users. Crystal Reports, like most BI tools, requires more extensive training and is not as easy or user friendly. It is more …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS has a mature and tested product that speaks well to internal personnel who rely on legacy data systems for day-to-day operations and business processes. It is apparent some newer products provide flexibility in user access with limited previous knowledge or experience …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I've used a few other development frameworks, but the desition of the company to use WF was not mine. I came and WF is the tool that the company uses.
I think that WF is a very important framework to achieve the goals of the company and I would like this technology to become the …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS is more visual and easier to build for a non-programming user, where with little knowledge on data management and dedication to learn it, you can easily start creating very well presented reporting that is automated. With the Report Caster system it allows you to fully …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Years ago I developed in Business Objects and when it came down to a decision to go with WebFOCUS it was a pretty easy choice. There is really nothing you can't do with the platform given all of the available options to develop the solutions with - HTML pages, parameterized …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I like the ease of development best on webfocus. As compared to Qlikview, it is better at handling large amounts of data and the data access process is much easier in WebFOCUS ( very manual in Qlik). Qlik is better for ad hoc drill through and it is nice how a selector easily …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Business Objects -WebFOCUS is more centered towards the user accessing data without an administrator setting up reporting objects or setting rules on data access. Access is more free form and allows the user more freedom (for better or worse) to design and create the report …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I found WebFOCUS a great tool for reporting purposes as I have used it for a long time. They should compare themselves with new reporting tools like Tableau and Splunk. Tableau's interface is mind blowing. IBI should learn from Tableau and how they have penetrated the big data …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
The reason we chose WebFOCUS is because it seemed the easiest to use to create great reporting products. Also, we really liked that the code is transparent and readily available. We were confident in Information Builder's longevity and believed that ultimately, our staff would …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Haven't used any and not even think of using any. We are very much satisfied with WebFocus.
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS was selected because of the rich data interface/adapter
Cyfe
Chose Cyfe
Klipfolio probably had a lot of cool features, but it was SO user-UNfriendly that we never got to use them. We had high enough turnover in our company that people always needed Klipfolio training, and it was rarely completed to the satisfaction of trainees or trainers. It was …
Chose Cyfe
These other reporting tools are much better for an agency that is under the scrutiny of cleaner reports with more in-depth analytics and specific KPI's. However, you can use both and provide a Cyfe board as a live additional to the weekly static reporting that many agencies …
Chose Cyfe
Sprout has better reporting for social analytics but doesn't cover as many activities across a company and the reports are only for social...not even web analytics. It's also way more expensive. We're actually evaluating whether or not Cyfe will continue to be our tool of …
Chose Cyfe
My company already subscribed to Cyfe when I began, so for me there wasn't any shopping around. While Cyfe does pull straight from the "back end" side of many social media platforms, or from Google Analytics for websites, the benefit is that you can see all the stats in one …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe is cheaper than Geckoboard; and I believe (??) has more integrations you can pull data from. I liked Geckoboard a tad better visually.
Chose Cyfe
We used RavenTools in the past as our monthly reporting tool. At the time there wasn't a one-page dashboard available in RavenTools, every single element we incorporate in our reports was included on a separate page. It became very unwieldy for our clients and led to a lot of …
Chose Cyfe
Compared to other tools like Jasper Reports, Cyfe has ZERO impact on the server since it is a totally hosted solution, plus it has several connectors that allow for interacting with no coding at all. It gives the user total freedom on which language to use to provide custom …
Chose Cyfe
We were using different tools to do pieces of what Cyfe does. I was never keen on the idea of spending $150, $200, or even $500+ for an analytics tool so we were pulling analytics directly from each source and creating our own reports. It was a beast of a project to manage and …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe more than holds its own vs the competition. The capabilities are strong - especially for the price.
Chose Cyfe
Hootsuite is good for tracking online activity. Cyfe has the same capabilities and more.
Chose Cyfe
Remember that Cyfe is not a true Business Intelligence tool it is a data visualization tool. It is great because it let's you change the time series. It will not let you drill down on the data. You cannot map different data sets together. It is a great tool to pull basic data …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe really shines by pulling in only the relevant data you want to see while being logged in to multiple accounts.
Chose Cyfe
The price was a big selling point but more importantly the third-party integrations that are offered were the deciding factor. Offering support for services that we use regularly like Google Analytics, Apple's iTunes Connect, Facebook, etc., allow us to get real time access to …
Chose Cyfe
I investigated a number of options for a digital dashboard, to be honest Cyfe was so much cheaper than the alternatives I was a bit sceptical, but it was so much better once I had mastered adding data sources.
Chose Cyfe
The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe's pricing model makes it affordable for a small company like mine.
Chose Cyfe
Yet to find a comparative product that can offer the same pricing, service and capabilities
Chose Cyfe
Have not tried other products.
Chose Cyfe
Domo was vastly overpriced compared Cyfe and it was far less friendly to use and get used to. I was able to jump right in with Cyfe and get the data I wanted setup right away. When I had a question I was able to get an immediate response directly from Deven without hesitation. …
Features
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Formatting capabilities10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
9.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Versioning6.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
6.3
Ratings
23% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.9
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model10.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)10.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
5.9
Ratings
29% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
9.3
Ratings
17% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Mobile Application3.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
8.6
Ratings
10% above category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.4
Ratings
7% above category average
REST API10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Javascript API8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
iFrames8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)8.00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.0 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ibi WebFOCUSCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
WebFOCUS is a good comprehensive tool for BI for companies. I feel that scenarios where you want the user to interact and be able to ingest data in different formats would be a good use of the tool. Performing data discovery is easier with InfoAssist, especially the most recent versions, and allows users to customize their views and provide comments.
Read full review
Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
Read full review
Pros
  • Webfocus reports all have the option to export to Excel. The excel spreadsheet is always very organized and clean, and the information is very easy to read.
  • Webfocus is able to maintain data from years prior. We can look up what we featured in catalogs and all the sales history attached with it.
  • Webfocus is able to provide support to a variety of departments. For example, our buying team uses it for planning in advance and our marketing team uses the tool to see how categories and products as the selling
Read full review
  • Cyfe makes it easy to create a professional looking dashboards in a short amount of time. With so many built-in data sources and the intuitive nature of the interface, you can have beautiful looking charts and graphs in no time!
  • One of the best features of Cyfe is the many data sources built-in and that each dashboard is not constrained to one source. One of the drawbacks I've seen in other tools is the limited ability to pull from multiple Google Analytics profiles, multiple AdWords accounts or from both AdWords and Bing in one dashboard. Cyfe has no such limitation.
  • Google Spreadsheets - if the data you need to show is not available via an API, being able to pull from Google spreadsheets is a great solution. Once set up, you can add data whenever you need to the spreadsheet and your widgets in the Cyfe dashboard are automatically updated. Huge time saver!
Read full review
Cons
  • The Developer Studio has some bugs. I've faced errors where swapping between our DEV and PROD servers causes that the software stops responding.
  • Easy to find documentation and examples. WebFOCUS has some help with this but it'd be better to provide more real life examples.
  • Sometimes it's harder to code the graphical interface of the report because of the HTML styling.
Read full review
  • Sometimes the percentages in Cyfe seem off. We'll review the numbers month over month in Google Analytics and the same numbers are pulled into Cyfe, and yet Cyfe reports a different percentage
  • It would be nice if Cyfe had more styling and layout choices to brand it more to our company's style and look
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
This software is deeply engrained with my organization and has become a tool that would not easily be replaced without spending more money and resources to get the same results. License cost is comparable to other report writing tools and the capabilities are greater than the competition without having to buy multiple apps to do the same thing.
Read full review
It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
Read full review
Usability
Best BI tool/product I have used. The others don't compare overall. Some can look fancier, but when you actually use them with large data and data from numerous systems/sources that is where most of the competition falls away. I also don't like downtime. I have basically none for a large user base with WebFocus. Even SAP Crystal Reports went down for 4 days once - 4 days because the admin password got locked out due to a glitch and we had zero reports for 4 days. WebFocus has never had more than a few minutes of downtime. It's like a tank that just keeps rolling. There is no other choice for reliable BI.
Read full review
I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Tracking availability formally for almost two years and we are at 99.8%
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They have extremely knowledgeable techs that I have worked with over the years. Some have actually become really good friends of mine. I see them often at local user groups and when we show them how we are using their tools to save millions of dollars throughout the company
Read full review
Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
Read full review
Online Training
It's hit and miss, the last class was overcrowded and people were having trouble connecting which took up much of the time. Instructors vary
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Plan ahead on what data will be accessible and the type of security required on the database and if you will want to use security that is built into the software. It is worth consulting with the vendor on what your plan is and how they recommend you proceed in order to get results you are happy with.
Read full review
Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Above average. Feature wise [Information Builders WebFOCUS] stands out. User friendliness is OK. It can handle the most complex tasks and its extensions with for example R make it extremely versatile. Support is lagging in western Europe, although i am more than happy with current level. With takeover by tipco it remains to be seen how European strategy will evolve
Read full review
My company already subscribed to Cyfe when I began, so for me there wasn't any shopping around. While Cyfe does pull straight from the "back end" side of many social media platforms, or from Google Analytics for websites, the benefit is that you can see all the stats in one place rather than having to log in to so many other platforms to grab those metrics.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are not yet a success story. Though we've been implementing WebFOCUS for over a year, we have very few products in our Production portal. Of course, this is not all the responsibility of Information Builders, but we were ill-advised by our 'training coordinator' in our training of staff and coming up to speed with the tools has been very slow.
  • Once skilled analysts and professional IT staff achieve a grasp of the products, they are able to very quickly create polished and well-received products.
  • The DW/BI project has helped us to establish standards and protocols of communication that will allow us to more quickly meet knowledge transfer requirements
Read full review
  • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
  • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
  • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
  • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
Read full review
ScreenShots