IBM Analytics Engine vs. QlikView

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM BigInsights is an analytics and data visualization tool leveraging hadoop.N/A
QlikView
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
QlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
Pricing
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
QlikView
Custom
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsOn an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Considered Both Products
IBM Analytics Engine
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We have tried the following solutions in the past and I must say they can't compare to IBM Analytics Engine:

Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Our data analytics team happened to try IBM Analytics just to get acquainted with it & it turned out that this tool fits our business requirement better than the one which we were using in terms of the features along with the level of support that they provide. so, choosing the …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics is a great tool and a welcome addition to your overall IBM strategy. I think in cases of tools like this, you either go with what your platform works best with or you go completely different with a 3rd party, like Snowflake. We are an Azure shop and just happened …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We initially wanted to go with Google BigQuery, mainly for the name recognition. However, the pricing and support structure led us to seek alternatives, which pointed us to IBM. Apache Spark was also in the running, but here IBM's domination in the industry made the choice a …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We did an evaluation of Google Analytics and Microsoft Azure Stream Analytics in comparison to the IBM Analytics Engine product. We choose the product offering from IBM because we felt that for our company, this product offered a more complete and comprehensive package to …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Hortonworks Data Platform, Apache Spark, Tableau Desktop and Tableau Online
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
  • I have been using Azure for my previous analysis, I had a difficult time in understanding the Analytics engine rather IBM provided step by step tutorial for setup.
  • Also turning off a machine was not an option in Azure for some of the services so I had to pay for the service …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Our professor has worked with IBM And many major tech companies. He’d recommend us which tools to use. And comparing to Azure, IBM is more convenient to use.
QlikView
Chose QlikView
We use Qlik Sense to feed QlikView reports.
Chose QlikView
QlikView, Tableau, and SiSense are all very good BI tools for analysis and reporting. Tableau was better at intuitively matching fields of disparate data and more visually appealing, but I think QlikView is faster. Tableau was also easier for someone to use to build and …
Chose QlikView
The price and functionality of QlikView best suit the needs of our organization.
Chose QlikView
I think it all comes down to personal preference and integration compatibility with the existing systems in the organization. However, I would argue that Qlik and PowerBI are the top-tier available solutions due to robust features and capabilities, and I would put solutions …
Chose QlikView
With QlikView and Qlik Sense the users can answer their own questions more interactively. They also can build their own visualizations without waiting [for] someone from IT to create a new report. The users can navigate through the data finding out relevant information. Through …
Chose QlikView
We have not necessarily used any direct competitors to QlikView, but we have used other analysis and reporting software that has worked better for us because of the type of data that we are analyzing. There are also cheaper options out there that are definitely better.
Chose QlikView
When integrating the tool years ago, we looked at other options including the out of the box reporting features from our current ERP software, The user interface and report-ability was very difficult to use and scale across may different business models in our group. We also …
Chose QlikView
Each tool has their own pros and cons; QlikView works well for our needs at this time.
Chose QlikView
QlikView was a customer requirement, so we did not evaluate any other product with these functionalities. It was the only option presented to us.
Chose QlikView
There are more than 1700 partners in the world that could implement a QlikView solution, and these associates tend to have a long and close relationship with the customer, and ultimately lead up to understanding the customer's needs at 100%. Also, the software is very scalable …
Chose QlikView
MS Power BI and other BI tools have similar functions to QlikView and some of them also have much cheaper price. However, the strength of QlikView is that it is much easier to use and to learn. If you need to train a new person to learn the tool, it costs around 1-2 days.
Chose QlikView
QlikView has its own data warehouse, which is the most important reason why would I choose QlikView over any other tools. Apart from that, the feature options are good for the ones who know the tool well but created a steeper learning curve in the beginning. Once you went …
Chose QlikView
Qlik was less intuitive than Paxata, but less expensive than either MicroStrategy or PowerBI. Qlik has enough breadth to accommodate most use cases without breaking the bank.
Chose QlikView
It is inexpensive and cost prohibited software. Has alot of canned reports that you would need and doesn't request much development work. Widely adopted as an industry leader and works well with many of the top data source applications. Very easy to use and intuitive in the …
Chose QlikView
We use it as a part of our Office 365 tool. With that tool, we do not have an option to download the reports and send them to customers, but with Qlikview we can.
Chose QlikView
Other BI and reporting tools have some of the same capability but the actual UI and ease of use were not there when we compared.
Chose QlikView
QlikView is cost-efficient and has a free desktop version to try out the different functions of it before you make the purchase decision.
Chose QlikView
QlikView is very similar to Tableau. However, I believe it is a cheaper solution, and that is why our company has chosen QlikView. It has been able to handle large, large amounts of data sets, and has been pretty agile for our business needs.
Chose QlikView
My use of Cognos was as an embedded BI tool inside of a cloud HCM. At the time, you could not marry up data from other external sources with that version. QlikView makes it easy to connect data from multiple sources. As a BI tool I do prefer the Cognos set up, but that's more …
Chose QlikView
QlikView was already chosen and implemented before I started [to work here], but it is very easy to learn (for me) and I started to solve problems within a day or two.
Chose QlikView
While I may have to export the data, I was doing so anyway to get it into excel to drive better visualizations of the data. When I discovered PowerBI and all it had available I no longer had a need for QlikView.
Chose QlikView
The first thing we liked about QlikView was the price. For a small amount per user, I can have a very useful software to manage the whole data set our company uses. The Tableau desktop has very high pricing for the software, and for just one user, not the whole organization. …
Chose QlikView
It's easier to learn than Pentaho.
Chose QlikView
Qlikview is more outdated compared to Qlik Sense. Qlik Sense puts more of the power onto the users to create their own dashboards while QlikView tends to be managed by BI teams.
Features
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
7.9
Ratings
5% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
8.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
QlikView
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Score 9.2 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Analytics EngineQlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
We are at present utilizing IBM Analytics Engine and it works incredible. Following are the things that I like the most about this product is:- - Simple to Utilize - Reasonable Cost - With only a couple seconds you can ready to fabricate and convey groups - you can without much of a stretch break down information through different applications
Read full review
Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
Read full review
Pros
  • We are able to build and deploy clusters within minutes to simplify user experience and increase scalability and reliability.
  • We are able to scale and compute on-demand to handle newer workloads like machine learning.
  • We really like that we are able to access and administer the application via multiple interfaces.
Read full review
  • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
  • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
  • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like to see a more robust version of their online help
  • The speed of their business support is adequate, but I kind of expect more from such a powerhouse.
  • Problems with duration of cluster life
Read full review
  • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
  • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
  • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I do think there is a steep learning curve to the program and that it requires a high level of experience or a data scientist background to fully take advantage and implement dashboards, and users will require ongoing training to maximize ROI, but it is absolutely worth it considering the impact it can make on an organization.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
QlikView server is very stable, with minimal errors and rare outages.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The scripting option gives me options to connect to different databases with ease
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The documentation presented by QlikView is very clear and exact. This makes the process of implementation more easy. If any questions arise while creating the reports it is very easy to access the QlikView documents through the internet. QlikView also has a Qlik Community, full of different questions and answers. This helps a lot to resolve issues even without contacting the support team.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It has taken some time to get used to Qlikview and the backend team behind it. From understanding the new regulations on using less images and also pushing for more tools (such as full compatibility on desktop, laptop, ipad, phone). We were given training on this and have helpful tips to find analytics behind Qlikview but it is very much also a learn as you implement system.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
  • I have been using Azure for my previous analysis, I had a difficult time in understanding the Analytics engine rather IBM provided step by step tutorial for setup.
  • Also turning off a machine was not an option in Azure for some of the services so I had to pay for the service whether I use it or not
Read full review
With QlikView and Qlik Sense the users can answer their own questions more interactively. They also can build their own visualizations without waiting [for] someone from IT to create a new report. The users can navigate through the data finding out relevant information. Through QlikView color code, users can get aware of the relationship between the different data points.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has saved us quite a bit of time managing our catalog of clusters and keeping things organized.
  • Since we had a division we acquired running IBM Cloud, it was easy to get it running and try it out, but we found we prefer our Azure configuration better simply to keep our technology in alignment across corporate functions.
  • I definitely see some cost savings by separating out the storage and compute. It helps you start to put an appropriate price tag on certain instances of big data.
Read full review
  • Speed to market is the really big thing. You can attach to multiple data sources quickly and build a consumable model for a dashboard. It doesn’t require IT talent to build. We have built more dashboards and added more users in the last year, then in our entire history. I was at a company of 30k+ employees before, and we didn't have near this level of BI adoption.
  • As a result, we are seeing benefits across business function. For example, within sales, our pipeline has much more visibility. It allows for much faster decisions on things like quotas. One of our biggest power users is in sales ops. She feels her dashboards load 10x faster than our previous tool and she can make changes on the fly.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QlikView Screenshots

Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen