IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM’s App Connect is a cloud-based data integration platform with data mapping and transformation capabilities within connectors between high-volume systems. App Connect also offers near-real time data synchronization and an API builder that is adaptable to the user’s coding skill level.N/A
SnapLogic
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
SnapLogic is a cloud integration platform with a self-service capacity supported by over 450 prebuilt modifiable connectors. SnapLogic also offers real-time and batch integration processes for interfacing with external data sources, a drag-and-drop interface, and use of the vendors’ Iris AI.N/A
Pricing
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Considered Both Products
IBM App Connect
Chose IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect started as MQSeries Integrator (MQSI) more than 20 years ago. In the IT environment, this is like an eternity. And this allowed a lot of customer experience and needs to be embedded in the product. Without it becoming a legacy application. The changes done in …
Chose IBM App Connect
I used the IBM WebSphere DataStage tool which is an ETL tool where we extract transform and load. This tool is a little tougher to understand than App Connect. For example, to build a job in App Connect is easier than DataStage. We can schedule the job to run in the same …
Chose IBM App Connect

IBM API Connect is positioned ahead of Apigee in the Gartner report. But in my opinion the development experience and the data transformation capability is way better in Apigee and it’s a proved solution and has a huge client list. (I have worked on an American Express …

Chose IBM App Connect
We did not select Cast Iron as our iPaaS solution, it was the weakest competitor in the field that we evaluated. Our experience was that it was not nearly as easy to learn, without in-depth training and guidance, and the developer UI was extremely buggy. We subjected each of …
Chose IBM App Connect
WebSphereCast Iron is preferred for our sales and delivery teams over Informatica. We find the products and teams for WebSphere Cast Iron easier to work with here and find WebSphere Cast Iron better when integrating with non-Salesforce systems.
WebSphere Cast Iron struggles to …
Chose IBM App Connect
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven …
Chose IBM App Connect
The choice of IBM App Connect was a strategic decision driven by the urgent need for agile, user-friendly, and cost-effective application and data integration. While DataPower, webMethods, and API Connect are powerful tools in their own rights, their primary focuses as security …
SnapLogic
Chose SnapLogic
Other providers found it difficult to allow us to use their services on our cloud premises (exclusively in our AWS accounts) which we need for compliance. SnapLogic was able to give us this guarantee.
Chose SnapLogic
Developer friendly tool Debug capabilities Ease of use
Chose SnapLogic
Boomi was our runner-up product. The pricing model was much higher and cost-prohibitive. They were not as flexible with pricing on a non-profit higher education institution. We did love their integration code library shared across all clients. The user interface was on par …
Chose SnapLogic
Strong user community Strong services expertise Strong consulting partnership Product functionality and performance Overall costs
Chose SnapLogic
We opted for SnapLogic due its ease of use and the flexibility it offers, it was the platform that was strongest in both application integration and data integration and both were use cases we wanted to be able to cover.
Chose SnapLogic
The simple interface and ease of building the pipelines with "snaps" was a selling point for SnapLogic. Amongst the multitude of snap packs available with new ones constantly being added. The support and vendor engagement was also very pleasant. Although amongst the more …
Chose SnapLogic
SnapLogic suits my company's needs better than Scribe because it's a lot less complicated to move data between different systems, and the monitoring aspect is way better. Scribe does have better customer support though, as SnapLogic is a lot more hands-off. Scribe feels easier …
Chose SnapLogic
Snaplogic is great for what it is. It's not an all-inclusive solution. You likely don't need a snap license when you have one or two systems, or you don't have a centralized SQL database. Once you have multiple tools and you start automating reports you'll want a license to tie …
Chose SnapLogic
Earlier we used to work on this tool, but since SnapLogic came in the picture it gave us a lot of confidence to work faster, easier and in a more convenient way. So I would recommend using SnapLogic because of its simple functionality for smaller organizations. It is fast at …
Chose SnapLogic
SnapLogic does better API integration than Informatica Power Center. Informatica has better re-usable component integration and version control than Snaplogic. Metadata lineage for Informatica is better than SnapLogic. I do not think that SnapLogic is better than SSIS.
Chose SnapLogic
SnapLogic is easy to use, way cheaper, has extensive support, wide variety of connectors to use and much of their basic snaps are free.
Chose SnapLogic
Snaplogic was much better than Boomi in the customer response time. In fact, this was one of the deal-breaker reasons. SnapLogic was better than Informatica in its ability to read directly from the sources/SFTP files instead of downloading them.
Pentaho is great, but we wanted …
Chose SnapLogic
We selected SnapLogic because it paired really well with the two cloud systems we needed to move data between. The pre-built connecters allowed us to easily set up our pipelines to create the ETL of data between the two systems.
Features
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
SnapLogic
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Pre-built connectors9.10 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Connector modification8.20 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.40 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Data quality services8.40 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Data security features8.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Monitoring console5.60 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zapier
Zapier
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM App ConnectSnapLogic
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM App Connect is well-suited to serve as a central integration hub, particularly for scenarios involving data transformation, complex routing logic, and dynamic backend routing. It excels at enabling legacy system modernization and supports real-time, event-driven architectures effectively. However, it is less appropriate for simple point-to-point integrations or for use cases requiring workflow process management and human task orchestration, where BPM or lightweight automation tools may be more suitable.
Read full review
Snaplogic is unique from other IPASS tools if you're very sensitive about data security as they have an on-premise option where your data never needs to leave your data center. And data pipelines can be quickly created if Snaplogic has the requisite connector to your data sources. On the downside, if you're transforming a large amount of data for example in training machine learning models, a tool with elastic compute capability is more appropriate.
Read full review
Pros
  • Just the ability to display and consume data through a single dashboard makes this a great application for our business purposes.
  • With the ability to consume their exposed API, data validation and manipulation becomes a breeze.
Read full review
  • Their customer service response time is brilliant.
  • SFTP tasks do a great job in reading the file directly from the server, instead of having to download it and then read it.
  • Tasks expose the ability to run them using external job schedulers.
  • Once you have a server up, setting up SnapLogic service does not take long. They have good documentation and customer support too.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI crashed constantly while trying to develop integrations.
  • The UI was not nearly as intuitive as many of its competitors in the iPaaS space, which lead to a much larger learning curve.
Read full review
  • Git integration outside of Github (Bitbucket, and other git service providers)
  • I would like to see an improved way to perform unit testing within the SnapLogic framework, as opposed to the manual approach
  • I would prefer that the underlying source of SnapLogic pipelines be more human-readable, although it is a GUI approach to authoring pipelines
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is the best on-premise application to cloud integration in the market. I guess IBM is planning to integrate IBM App Connect with the IBM API Connect solution.
Read full review
This has been hands down the BEST software company I have ever used and dealt with. I am a 25 year IT veteran at this college. They go above and beyond in soliciting our feedback/input and proactively follow up about bugs, issues, etc. I have given multiple potential clients my thoughts and after seeing the SL demo they all sign up. I appreciate their support model, it's REFRESHING!
Read full review
Usability
You can do some really powerful things with this system. The overall design is an attempt to make configurable some of the routine tasks/common functionality, but allow for development/customization of the core of the application.
Read full review
It is very powerful but has a steep learning curve
Read full review
Support Rating
Support is good, however it takes longer than expected to get responses. When bugs are reported they often seem to fall into a black hole.
Read full review
They can be prompt but they have not been as useful as I've wanted. We had a bug that affected many of our customers through an API connection between SnapLogic and our platform. Eventually they were able to figure it out, but it took a long time of negotiating between our engineering team and theirs. Additionally, we installed the SnapLogic groundplex for our customers and we've run into a bunch of problems of connectivity. If SnapLogic offered to be on those calls with our clients to troubleshoot how to fix these problems, I would give them a better grade here.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The groundplex in our VPC is very nice for security reasons and the SnapLogic team was extremely helpful during our implementation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven scalability to the cloud. Its key strength is enabling deep integration by combining low-code with the power of complex, custom logic, ensuring the platform's capabilities exactly matched our need to handle complex flows.
Read full review
Boomi was our runner-up product. The pricing model was much higher and cost-prohibitive. They were not as flexible with pricing on a non-profit higher education institution. We did love their integration code library shared across all clients. The user interface was on par with Snaplogic as well as the features that come included. Overall, seemed like a solid product just found something better for a lower price point.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We can integrate different applications in just few hours
  • We can validate the received/sent messages
  • We can monitor any error appeared in the flows
Read full review
  • We had a positive impact at our organization where handful of developers were able to integrate more than 50 systems in less than a year. It has helped us a lot by providing access to data that was previously not possible or unimaginable or get in such easy format.
  • The only place where it didn't have a positive impact was for a realtime application integration project requiring on the fly aggregations, wherein this tool claimed it could do it but wasn't able to.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SnapLogic Screenshots

Screenshot of the Designer of SnapLogic's Enterprise Integration Cloud, which showcases the clicks-not-code approach to creating integration pipelines. Notice the machine-learning powered integration assistant, Iris, to the right suggests which Snaps (our term for connectors) to use from our catalogue of nearly 450+ pre-built connectors.Screenshot of the Enterprise Integration Cloud Dashboard used to monitor the status and health your pipelines and Snaplexes. Pipelines can be optimized further from here.Screenshot of the Manager tab of the Enterprise Integration Cloud Dashboard, used to manage users, groups, project spaces, pipelines and security. It can also display account and Snap statistics.