IBM App Connect vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM’s App Connect is a cloud-based data integration platform with data mapping and transformation capabilities within connectors between high-volume systems. App Connect also offers near-real time data synchronization and an API builder that is adaptable to the user’s coding skill level.N/A
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Considered Both Products
IBM App Connect
Chose IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect started as MQSeries Integrator (MQSI) more than 20 years ago. In the IT environment, this is like an eternity. And this allowed a lot of customer experience and needs to be embedded in the product. Without it becoming a legacy application. The changes done in …
Chose IBM App Connect
I used the IBM WebSphere DataStage tool which is an ETL tool where we extract transform and load. This tool is a little tougher to understand than App Connect. For example, to build a job in App Connect is easier than DataStage. We can schedule the job to run in the same …
Chose IBM App Connect

IBM API Connect is positioned ahead of Apigee in the Gartner report. But in my opinion the development experience and the data transformation capability is way better in Apigee and it’s a proved solution and has a huge client list. (I have worked on an American Express …

Chose IBM App Connect
We did not select Cast Iron as our iPaaS solution, it was the weakest competitor in the field that we evaluated. Our experience was that it was not nearly as easy to learn, without in-depth training and guidance, and the developer UI was extremely buggy. We subjected each of …
Chose IBM App Connect
WebSphereCast Iron is preferred for our sales and delivery teams over Informatica. We find the products and teams for WebSphere Cast Iron easier to work with here and find WebSphere Cast Iron better when integrating with non-Salesforce systems.
WebSphere Cast Iron struggles to …
Chose IBM App Connect
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven …
Chose IBM App Connect
The choice of IBM App Connect was a strategic decision driven by the urgent need for agile, user-friendly, and cost-effective application and data integration. While DataPower, webMethods, and API Connect are powerful tools in their own rights, their primary focuses as security …
UiPath Integration Service
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was an established partner before I started working for the organization. I did not review alternatives.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Multi-touch point integrations and developer friendly. More expensive but better features.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was the vendor that had the largest catalog of technologies to integrate with, had support during the sales and development process, and provided go-to-market assistance that others did not offer. We chose them because of their suite of services and offerings and …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form. Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
At the time we found Cloud Elements we found no other option that had a Unified API for cloud storage providers.
Features
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zapier
Zapier
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM App ConnectUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM App Connect is well-suited to serve as a central integration hub, particularly for scenarios involving data transformation, complex routing logic, and dynamic backend routing. It excels at enabling legacy system modernization and supports real-time, event-driven architectures effectively. However, it is less appropriate for simple point-to-point integrations or for use cases requiring workflow process management and human task orchestration, where BPM or lightweight automation tools may be more suitable.
Read full review
Areas where it would be appropriate:
  1. If you want a really 'deep' integration with a third party software, and you want all the control over how it interacts with your software
  2. If you want a totally white-labeled solution, that is totally invisible to your customers.
  3. if you care more about a well thought out/useful API, rather than a pretty UI
Areas where it is less appropriate:
  1. If you want a Zapier-esque hands-off integration for YOU.
  2. if you want your customers to do more of the work, pay for it/etc.
  3. if you're a really small business, it could be too expensive. But it depends on your individual contract with them.
Read full review
Pros
  • Just the ability to display and consume data through a single dashboard makes this a great application for our business purposes.
  • With the ability to consume their exposed API, data validation and manipulation becomes a breeze.
Read full review
  • Customer Support -- They have a knowledgeable team and are very responsive.
  • Communication -- Most questions are addressed quickly
  • Documentation -- The API documentation is well organized and easy to follow.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI crashed constantly while trying to develop integrations.
  • The UI was not nearly as intuitive as many of its competitors in the iPaaS space, which lead to a much larger learning curve.
Read full review
  • There weren't really many cons to our experience. The only slight downside was the cost but they worked with us on that to make it work.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is the best on-premise application to cloud integration in the market. I guess IBM is planning to integrate IBM App Connect with the IBM API Connect solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
You can do some really powerful things with this system. The overall design is an attempt to make configurable some of the routine tasks/common functionality, but allow for development/customization of the core of the application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support is good, however it takes longer than expected to get responses. When bugs are reported they often seem to fall into a black hole.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven scalability to the cloud. Its key strength is enabling deep integration by combining low-code with the power of complex, custom logic, ensuring the platform's capabilities exactly matched our need to handle complex flows.
Read full review
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form.

Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a more robust path to unifying the behavior of connected systems.

Zapier is a workflow automation tool that I feel draws erroneous comparison to Cloud Elements that I need to highlight. Workflow automation tools (Zapier, IFTTT, Microsoft Flow) do provide multiple integrations, but for simplistic scenarios where only a handful of explicitly described steps need accomplished. Cloud Elements is a platform for developers to deliver faster and with higher reliability than making integrations one-by-one in complex systems that solve demanding problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We can integrate different applications in just few hours
  • We can validate the received/sent messages
  • We can monitor any error appeared in the flows
Read full review
  • We are able to build integrations in HALF the time we could build them from scratch.
  • They allow our development team to spend more hours focused on developing our core product, not connections to other products.
  • Their large catalog of services to connect to allows us to spend much less time researching other platform integration endpoints and increases our R&D speed a considerable amount.
Read full review
ScreenShots