IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence vs. .NET

IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence

IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence

1 Reviews and Ratings

.NET

.NET

139 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence (ADDI) is an application which supports application modernization by producing intelligence to improve application efficiency and performance.	N/A
.NET	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft's .Net is an open source, freeware application infrastructure.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence

.NET

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	.NET
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	.NET
Considered Both Products	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence No answer on this topic	.NET Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET .NET is equivalent to Java, a byte-code compiled, just-in-time native compiled, garbage collected language and runtime, with performance and features that are basically equivalent. .NET worked for us because it gave us a native-ish Windows user interface, as opposed to the … Incentivized Helpful? Sean Patterson Software Development Director Chose .NET Compared to PHP, .Net has a far better-standardized framework from which to pick and choose libraries from. It is also a more mature language, even though PHP has been out a bit longer. The ability to create desktop apps using .Net is another benefit compared to PHP. If a very … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET If it was up to me, I'd rather use something like Node.JS hands down. Things are simpler, there is no gigantic convoluted class hierarchy to learn like there is with .NET. Also Node is really fast and lightweight. I find .NET these days to be a totally solid product and it … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET .Net is multi-platform and integrates many languages which makes it a one stop universal platform for everything. It further allows for easy collaboration and interfaces with Git for version control. It also has a very elaborate variety of extensions making the possibilities … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET Java is confusing sometimes and has poor IDEs. Now it is no more open source, so it does not worth [starting] a project with Java. The new .NET Core is available for Linux and MacOS too, so it would not be a problem to plan a migration. Moreover[,] the performances are really … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET I have used Java and .NET seems to be a more solid development ecosystem As time has gone on they have improved their cross-platform capabilities and deeply improved their support for the open-source community. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET The .NET platform has a much longer and broader history than Laravel, so we chose to go with it as the support will be far superior. Additionally, Laravel is tied to PHP, while you can use multiple different languages in .NET. The additional flexibility that .NET provides in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET Full documentation Support from Microsoft and stable releases from Microsoft. Visual studio Incentivized Helpful? Kaleb-John Loo Senior Firmware Engineer Chose .NET Both Java and .NET are similar. They provide nearly the same capabilities so long as you know how to use the differences in the way they structure in how they handle objects. The benefit to using the .NET framework is the ability to use all of the features of the Visual Studio … Incentivized Helpful? Gordon Lo Digital Solutions Architect Chose .NET Java vs .NET these days is more of a preference than anything else; you pick and choose whichever works best for you. Both have active and vibrant community support, and both have good development tools to work with. The benefit that .NET has over Java is that you can get … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET We are currently moving away from Visual LANSA as it does not do well on the web. Developers are hard to find for this language while .NET developers are readily available and very knowledgeable. By switching to .NET, our development time has been cut down and has become more … Incentivized Helpful? Oberdan Nunes System Architect \| IT Development Manager Chose .NET .Net platform is our primary option for developing newer solutions because of a lot of reasons, but in the past years, we have received a few requests in which we had to use Java SE. We had no big problem to use Java. Still, the productivity difference and the offer of … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET Easily found human resource, low development cost, very compatible and convenient interface. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET We have worked with Java in the past but their library, functions, features out the box are not as helpful as those provided by .NET. Additionally, these features can be harder to implement depending on your business and it's harder to find these skills/resources from the … Incentivized Helpful? Kyle Kochtan Technical Lead Chose .NET Microsoft .NET has been the choice of development here for a long time and was chosen for its portability, ease of development and more. We have been very successful in developing custom applications in Microsoft .NET. This back end of Microsoft .NET applications has made it … Incentivized Helpful? Patrick Morris Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Chose .NET .NET seems to be more mature and a definite improvement over Java. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET We evaluated Java as a platform for custom development. There were many advantages to using Java like - Java is portable, so you can choose whatever operating system you need to build your app or website. Object-relational support is better, and Java calls the database less … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET TFS and GIT used as source control. It really works seamlessly with MS builds, Jenkins, Jfrog and CARA. It provides a complete DevOps process. Splunk and EL are tools used for logging, tracking, and tracing purposes. ServiceNow creates a domain to contain all information and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET It has modern features (8+ years ahead of Java), the best IDE (Visual Studio), and best in breed support for Windows environments. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET .NET comes with a better development environment and offers more flexibility than Java. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET There really isn't anything like .NET. I have tried using Eclipse to develop applications in Java, and have tried using Qt Creator to develop C++ applications. I found Microsoft's Visual Studio suites far easier to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose .NET .NET is built by Microsoft and mainly uses C#. It is great if you work a lot with Windows or Azure. Java runs on the JVM (Java Virtual Machine) and has been around longer. It is known for being reliable and widely used in large systems. Overall .Net works very well for us in a … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	.NET
Small Businesses	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	.NET
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.7 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Application Discovery and Delivery Intelligence	.NET
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	If you need to build anything from a quick-and-dirty GUI utility to a full-fledged desktop application, .NET is the way to go. It doesn't require extensive knowledge of the languages as Visual Studio is extremely helpful in its autocomplete, refactoring, and prompts, and lets you build out your solution easily without worrying about the details of [the] setup and boilerplate. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Visual Studio is one of the best IDEs and .NET is the best framework to use with Visual Studio. There is a large network of support for the .NET framework. The .NET framework encompasses a very large area of the programming stack. The .NET framework is flexible and can be used for desktop applications or web development. Incentivized Kaleb-John Loo Senior Firmware Engineer Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	.NET is heavily Microsoft Windows oriented, and while .NET core tried to resolve that with MacOS and Linux support, .NET Core is still waiting for wider adoption. While free for small projects, additional features for big projects can be a little expensive. Can be resource-heavy upon deployment. We continuously have our more senior staff optimize the code of our junior developers for performance. Other languages are a little bit more forgiving in comparison. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	.NET frameworks are fantastic overall. There are no limitations to what you can accomplish with it. The most important part is that you'll have access to developer community support and that .NET is always being improved every month. Be it in web applications, back-end servers, or integrations, .NET enables developers to do it all. Incentivized Gordon Lo Digital Solutions Architect Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	As Microsoft Gold Partners, we do have access to a lot of additional information and support from Microsoft. Still, the availability of "open and free" documentation, community, and enthusiasts of the platform is vast. Added to that, the quality of resources provided for all the Microsoft ecosystem is very impressive. Incentivized Oberdan Nunes System Architect \| IT Development Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	If it was up to me, I'd rather use something like Node.js hands down. Things are simpler, there is no gigantic convoluted class hierarchy to learn like there is with .NET. Also Node is really fast and lightweight. I find .NET these days to be a totally solid product and it certainly has its place - but it seems a bit dated and boring to me now. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	We are slowly switching from a dying programming language to .NET because it was too expensive to hire developers for the old programming language. There are way more .NET developers around and an amazing community which has allowed us to keep our costs low. Our development time has been greatly reduced because now we're not developing applications for each OS platform. We do it once and deploy accordingly. .NET Core has been a big mindshift in terms of how to program. The learning curve has been quite high for existing .NET developers. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots