IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers	Score8.7 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud bare metal servers are cloud servers configurable in hourly/monthly options, on-demand, from any location—with a selection of standard features and services for small businesses and enterprise demands. Users can customize RAM and SSDs with 11M+ configurations from which to choose.	$0.51 per hour

Pricing

IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers: starting at $0.51
per hour
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers: starting at $241.00
per month

Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Optional

IBM Bare Metal Servers offer a choice between hourly or monthly pre-configured servers or can be customized with single to quad processing solutions. Bare metal servers are available worldwide and with no monthly contracts. Amonthly bare metal server built to spec can be ordered and made available in two to four hours—with 500 GB/month outbound bandwidth included. An hourly bare metal server can be ordered, and it is made ready for in 20 to 30 minutes. Public outbound bandwidth is charged per gigabyte.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Considered Both Products	IBM Madhurani Sahani Project Controller in Engineering at Veidekke Norge (Construction, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM Cloud Virtual Private Cloud features are easy on customizing and the capability to manage all project data types is effective. Creating reliable reports and secure data transfer through Cloud service is amazing. The product Automation tools are stable, capacity planning … Incentivized Helpful? Diana Dumpsey PPC Manager in Marketing at Backfield Digital (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers is more effective and the capabilities for networking and servers performance management is more productive. Through IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers tools the multiple project data management and data transfer across entire Cloud service is more secure … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers better performance and robustness Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Well As we use other IBM Cloud services it is easier for us to implement the services from the same and easier and also implementing VPC, we have found it to be highly secure and cost-effective also. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Huawei was our first consideration. However, it had significant operational difficulties. Hence we had to move away from Huawei. Incentivized Helpful? Sandeep Eti InfraStructure Lead Architect in Information Technology at IBM (Hospital & Health Care, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Configured file systems on bare metal servers and was able to increase the size whenever required. Can limit the costs initially to understand the application demand and need. Later, have the flexibility to increase the size of the file system as the application grows bigger … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers meet our app requirement, and the support is good as well. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Came down to Price and the 20TB "free" egress made it a winner. Incentivized Helpful? Pooja Bhadja Full Stack developer in Information Technology at AI Software LLC (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers The Best part of this IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers is performance and a very highly usable part is Security stuff. everyone needs to secure their data and work with a smoothly running app. for this reason I select this server rather than another one. I will use it in feature … Incentivized Helpful? Nobuyuki Suzuki CAA (Chief Applications Architect) in Research & Development at F-TECH INC. (Automotive, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers I considered AWS EC2, but found the difference in operating costs compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers to be too great.　It is the data transfer fee.AWS EC2: 0 cost for upload, pay-as-you-go for download　IBMCloud Bare Metarl Servers: no cost for both upload and downloadIn … Incentivized Helpful? Sai karthik Satyavarapu Senior Technical Specialist in Information Technology at HCL Software (Information Services, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers UI is very easy and simple to navigate and not confusing and cost effective when compared to IBM for few features. Incentivized Helpful? Luciano Ghilarducci Especialista de Produto in Engineering at Ingram Micro Brasil (Computer Software, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers In fact, we have the same functionality on both. Brazil Azure and AWS had started offering those options before IBM, so IBM was [at a] disadvantage, now both are tied. Incentivized Helpful? Jonathan Geller CEO (Chief Executive Officer) in Corporate at SIPSTACK Inc. (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM brings the full suite, and coupled with Bare Metal, developing within the IBM / Softlayer SDK's and keeping smtp mail delivery, CDN, data block/object storage all from one place is simple. We were also evaluating DNS via Cloudflare before we departed IBM Cloud services. Incentivized Helpful? VINAY Mandora Sr Team Leader in Information Technology at Dish TV (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers is in every case better compared to the next seller items that are accessible in the market. This item gives us quick execution with bunches of safety and different highlights. No vacation and incredible specialized help are benefits of this item. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers We had considered AWS EC2. They offer similar functions we require. But we feel IBM is better due to the version changes that they implement and the security features. Incentivized Helpful? Mark Handcock IT Lead in Engineering at SolutionsITW (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers I would say that they are comparable in alot of ways and work about the same. Most cloud vendors today don't have alot of differentiations for the tasks that I perform on a daily basis. Incentivized Helpful? Sireesha Kotharu Senior Account Executive in Finance and Accounting at Bazaar setu (Internet, 51-200 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers AWS and Google are also providing very similar solutions but when we take a closer look at our needs and the pricing model each of the providers have, it is quite obvious for us to choose IBM. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers We vetted various competitors of IBM to gain better insight into our purchases. Again, this for most part depends on your organization, but IBM's advanced analytics platform is on par with most of the bigger platforms. They have developments that ease the speed of development … Incentivized Helpful? Ivo Draginov CEO\| at Batch Service (Real Estate, 501-1000 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers I selected IBM Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) because of 5 points that I thought and was proven correct based on my experience using the service. First is security which I strongly talked about all throughout my review. Secondly is agility. The third is Isolation. Fourth is … Incentivized Helpful? Ralph Rebacz CEO (Chief Executive Officer) in Professional Services at ArtisanECM LLC (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers IBM's documentation and support for IBM Cloud for IBM Cloud Pak for Automation was stronger than with Google Cloud. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers The AWS Bare Metal is a non-starter. $5000 for a "weaker" server than IBM offers and way, way, more configuration. GCP is still on-boarding their bare-metal solutions. The other places, such as digital ocean or rackspace tend to be pricier and you get less power. The only other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Offers a good price compared to Google Compute Engine, but we think deploying machines on Google to be a bit simpler due to the interface. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers I would take Schematics over CFTs! We are deploying AWAF (F5 ASM) in VPC instances which are superior to AWS WAF in policy features. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers

Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Feature	IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers 8.3 79 Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime	8.877 Ratings
Dynamic scaling	8.661 Ratings
Elastic load balancing	8.551 Ratings
Pre-configured templates	8.057 Ratings
Monitoring tools	8.270 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images	8.361 Ratings
Operating system support	8.476 Ratings
Security controls	8.574 Ratings
Automation	7.77 Ratings

User Ratings
	IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Likelihood to Recommend	8.2 (81 ratings)
Support Rating	7.3 (9 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.0 (23 ratings)

IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers

IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons