TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Cloud Storage vs. IBM Cloud File Storage

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud Storage

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Storage is unified object storage for developers and enterprises.N/A

    IBM Cloud File Storage

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Cloud StorageIBM Cloud File Storage
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud StorageIBM Cloud File Storage
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Cloud StorageIBM Cloud File Storage
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
    IBM Cloud File Storage feels a little more businessy tough Google Cloud Storage is cleaner and simpler (and cheaper).

    Right now I am giving it a go just for user data because the option to create just a bucket and connect it directly to the user machine is always valuable.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
    High speed to connection when using this platform is incredible with effective data encryption process and volume duplication and replication, always confident that your data is stored safely. Reaching for international dimensions to cater [to] our client's compliance …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
    IBM has a really compelling offering for businesses, offering greater scalability, and flexibility over the competing solutions. This is an ever more important area of cloud operations, and IBM offers a service backed by one of the biggest names in the industry, offering …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
    We selected IBM Cloud File Storage because of the company's reputation as a good provider of cloud file storage solutions and more generally, my company at that time relied heavily on IBM software. We hesitated a little bit with Amazon EFS which had some key features that IBM …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Google Cloud StorageIBM Cloud File Storage
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Google Cloud Storage and IBM Cloud File Storage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Storage
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cloud File Storage
    8.5
    39 Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings9.737 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling00 Ratings8.836 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing00 Ratings8.135 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates00 Ratings7.631 Ratings
    Monitoring tools00 Ratings8.037 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings8.133 Ratings
    Operating system support00 Ratings9.636 Ratings
    Security controls00 Ratings9.437 Ratings
    Automation00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud StorageIBM Cloud File Storage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (35 ratings)
    8.8
    (40 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (13 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)