TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Cloud File Storage vs. Microsoft Azure

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Cloud File Storage

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS.N/A

    Microsoft Azure

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.

    $29

    per month

    Pricing
    IBM Cloud File StorageMicrosoft Azure
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Developer
    $29
    per month
    Standard
    $100
    per month
    Professional Direct
    $1000
    per month
    Basic
    Free
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Cloud File StorageMicrosoft Azure
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThe free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Cloud File StorageMicrosoft Azure
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
    In my opinion, IBM has produced excellent products that have been instrumental in the development of our business. We rely heavily on data to power the programs in our organization. Because our systems can be accessed from various apps without experiencing any downtime, …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Cloud File StorageMicrosoft Azure
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of IBM Cloud File Storage and Microsoft Azure
    Feature
    IBM Cloud File Storage
    8.5
    39 Ratings
    Microsoft Azure
    8.5
    19 Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.737 Ratings9.018 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling8.836 Ratings8.018 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing8.135 Ratings9.017 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates7.631 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Monitoring tools8.037 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images8.133 Ratings8.016 Ratings
    Operating system support9.636 Ratings8.918 Ratings
    Security controls9.437 Ratings9.018 Ratings
    Automation7.030 Ratings8.016 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM Cloud File StorageMicrosoft Azure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (40 ratings)
    8.8
    (88 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (28 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.1
    (28 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)