IBM Cloud Private vs. NGINX Ingress Controller

IBM Cloud Private

NGINX Ingress Controller

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Cloud Private	Score 9.6 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics.	N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller	Score 7.9 out of 10	N/A	NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Cloud Private

NGINX Ingress Controller

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Private	NGINX Ingress Controller
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	IBM Cloud Private	NGINX Ingress Controller
Considered Both Products	IBM Cloud Private Nosava Begum Human Resources Manager Chose IBM Cloud Private With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved. Incentivized Helpful? Bhaskara Rudraraju Tech Consultant (ODM and BPM) Chose IBM Cloud Private IBM Cloud Functions Incentivized Helpful?	NGINX Ingress Controller Verified User Anonymous Chose NGINX Ingress Controller We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

IBM Cloud Private

NGINX Ingress Controller

Platform-as-a-Service

Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
	IBM Cloud Private 9.7 Ratings 19% above category average	NGINX Ingress Controller - Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Scalability	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Platform management overhead	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Platform access control	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Development environment creation	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Development environment replication	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Issue recovery	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Container Management

Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
	IBM Cloud Private - Ratings	NGINX Ingress Controller 7.8 Ratings 1% above category average
Security and Isolation	00 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization	00 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
Discovery Tools	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks	00 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	IBM Cloud Private	NGINX Ingress Controller
Small Businesses	AWS Lambda Score 8.7 out of 10	Portainer Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Cloud Private	NGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)	7.9 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Cloud Private	NGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend	IBM Cloud Private is well suited for SaaS models. Incentivized Bhaskara Rudraraju Tech Consultant (ODM and BPM) Read full review	Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications. Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review
Pros	There is a large variety of services available on IBM Cloud. This is my first experience with a PaaS and I haven’t had any major problems navigating around it. It is easy to deploy applications and services on IBM Cloud. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Provide access to containers Manage traffic Route traffic Lightweight Near to zero downtime Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	More hands on training outside of virtual classes would be helpful. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see. Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review
Alternatives Considered	With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved. Incentivized Nosava Begum Human Resources Manager Read full review	We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	N/A N/A N/A Incentivized Dinesh P Senior Infrastructure Engineer Read full review	Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress Cost optimization is one of the business objective Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review
ScreenShots