IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is a comprehensive service that offers fully managed OpenShift clusters, on IBM Cloud platform. It is directly integrated into the same Kubernetes service that maintains 25 billion on-demand forecasts daily at The Weather Company.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Considered Both Products
IBM Cloud Private
Chose IBM Cloud Private
With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved.
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
1. The pricing is better than the other competitors. 2. We are already using other services being offered by IBM, so it makes better sense to utilize the IBM cloud red hat open shift. 3. Support is also valuable. 4. security is good. 5. constant updates on clusters. 6. cloud …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Both have unique benefits for different uses. Docker is great for smaller projects on a single host or small cluster, whereas OpenShift is ideal when you need a scalable, fully managed, and secure Kubernetes platform. OpenShift also offers a more fully featured web-based …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is best when it comes to security capabilities and hybrid scenarios. With Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud we could provision new environments very quickly and in cost effective way. Customers could also use the cloud credits that they might have …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is a container application platform based on Kubernetes, that leverages our ability to start very quickly any containerized application developed with different languages, plus CI/CD, monitoring and logging and security.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
I prefer RedHat OpenShift because with kubernetes there are tons more installations and work effort required to get applications ready to run in the containerized environment. RedHat OpenShift is faster and easier to get up and running.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Planning to do so late. The evaluation for more vendors is in the cooking, pending budget approval & assignment to the right top guns. With the recession looming, I do wish that this key project could get approved & more discoveries could be made soon as I wished before.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
We evaluated a number of potential solutions and ultimately chose Red Hat OpenShift because it was compatible with our existing technology. Time and costs savings have been realized throughout the company since we implemented Red Hat OpenShift, and the IT department has been …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
We are using IBM Cloud App ID as a simple method to get an OIDC provider for our applications, that are running within the OpenShift cluster. Also, IBM Cloud Object Storage is used within the workload to store data via an s3 compliant way. The IBM Cloud Container Registry is an …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Red hat Openshift had a better user interface by far. Amazon EKS's was so basic it was essentially useless. We had to use a separate tool called lens to get basic stuff done. Lens was buggy and didn't work as well though, even for basic functionality like updating a K8s secret.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
For our particular use case, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud was very cost-competitive. We already had RHEL, OpenShift, and Ansible skills that translated to the service. From a feature and function perspective, most solutions have a parity but being open source and less chance …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
For one of our banking clients, I have explored and played around the Kubernetes platform on IBM Cloud. In the process to deploy the application, I had to create the deployment artifacts, which was quite cumbersome. But then for one of the automotive clients I was asked to …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
We tested Red Hat OpenShift on premise but we decided to go for a public cloud to reduce our infrastructure and pay for what we use.
Features
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Private
9.7
Ratings
19% above category average
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Private
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
7.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.7 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud PrivateRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Cloud Private is well suited for SaaS models.
Read full review
RedHat OpenShift is not only suited for IBM Cloud but can run in ANY cloud. We installed in Azure Cloud, for example. It can also run on Linux servers or a Power 9 machine. It is built for multi-cloud or on-prem environments. IBM support provides such excellent guidance in the installation and configuration that no other product on the market can beat it.
Read full review
Pros
  • There is a large variety of services available on IBM Cloud.
  • This is my first experience with a PaaS and I haven’t had any major problems navigating around it.
  • It is easy to deploy applications and services on IBM Cloud.
Read full review
  • Multiclick provisioning of resources makes it super easy to manage pods and deployments. We don't have to maintain code for the same
  • In built security features and customizability ensures that organization wide standards are integrated well into the containers
  • Automated backups, scale ups and fail recovery makes sure of minimal down time
Read full review
Cons
  • More hands on training outside of virtual classes would be helpful.
Read full review
  • I wish it had better compatibility with docker file syntax. We had issues when it couldn't build standard docker files
  • Wish it had better documentation
  • Wish they offered fully supported client libraries for the Openshift API rather than dumping it on a 3rd party
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I think response time for IBM Cloud support should be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved.
Read full review
We evaluated a number of potential solutions and ultimately chose Red Hat OpenShift because it was compatible with our existing technology. Time and costs savings have been realized throughout the company since we implemented Red Hat OpenShift, and the IT department has been freed up to focus on activities that are more valuable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • N/A
  • N/A
  • N/A
Read full review
  • Our customer satisfaction and NPS score has had positive outcomes based on new architecture
  • We are focused on business outcomes vs running the service and maintenance
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud has had a direct, positive impact on TCO, ROI, and payback period
  • Our staff is more focused on higher-level business activities, i.e. acquiring & customer retention
Read full review
ScreenShots