IBM Cloudability vs. ProsperOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloudability
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloudability is a cloud cost management and optimization tool that enables IT, finance, and business teams to optimize their costs and communicate the business value of the cloud.N/A
ProsperOps
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
ProsperOps is a fully automated, multi-cloud cost optimization platform for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Eliminating cloud waste and managing spend is one of the most persistent challenges for FinOps teams. Cloud usage is inherently elastic, but the financial instruments used to manage cost like Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Committed Use Discounts are rigid. ProsperOps bridges this gap by integrating automated rate optimization with intelligent workload…N/A
Pricing
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Considered Both Products
IBM Cloudability
Chose IBM Cloudability
Apptio Cloudability (pre-IBM acquisition), CloudHealth by VMware, AWS Cost Explorer, and Azure Cost Management. Each has its strengths, but Cloudability stood out for its multi-cloud coverage, commitment discount optimization, and finance-friendly reporting capabilities.
Chose IBM Cloudability
When we purchased they were close but we preferred some bits like forecasts
Chose IBM Cloudability
- Comprehensive cloud cost analytics- Effective cloud optimization tools- Strong multi-cloud management capabilities
Chose IBM Cloudability
Recently, I got an opportunity to review this tool in the India Apptio User Conference. Currently, I'm going through the use cases of this tool and checking if this helps us in any of the use cases. also, I've heard from the speaker that IBM Kubecost will be integrated in the …
Chose IBM Cloudability
For a single project and quick analysis about why my costs when overboard or why forecast is showing more than my budget, it is much easier to use AWS Cost Explorer over IBM Cloudability. I think this area should definitely improve and do some smart suggestions using AI …
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability stands out in the cloud cost management landscape due to its comprehensive features, strong multi-cloud support, and alignment with FinOps practices. Here's how it compares to other leading tools:
Chose IBM Cloudability
I believe that one complements the other, and it was great that Apptio brought them together on the same front.
Chose IBM Cloudability
We tried a few different tools as part of a POC but the fact that there is the IBM name attached to Apptio and just the complexity of our enterprise systems was something that we felt was best served by the IBM Cloudability tool. It integrated seamlessly with the multiple cloud …
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability does better on a lot of aspects. Still there are certain features that are exclusive to each product.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Apptio is better for forcasting and multi cloud
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Leadership is clear on the requirements and market demands, and they continue to improve. I have seen work happening at lightning speed based on the requirement.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Cloudabilty was implemented before I joined the organization, so apart from the Azure costings blade, I have no experience of alternatives.
Chose IBM Cloudability
Cloudability provides consolidated account views that I cannot see in AWS directly
Chose IBM Cloudability
I like IBM Cloudability compared to IBM SPSS Statistics because I think SPSS is a bit outdated. In my opinion, IBM Cloudability is more modern and helps present data better than SPSS could. Compared to Microsoft 365, I would say they are about even. One thing I like about …
Chose IBM Cloudability
We were already using ApptioOne
Chose IBM Cloudability
Power BI is a powerful tool for visualization. Apptio does a great job at managing the data from the cloud spend, but Power BI can create much better and more complex visualizations
Chose IBM Cloudability
Better features across more cloud providers. Faster reporting. However, Cloudability lacks some of the resource reporting we enjoy from CloudCheckr.
Chose IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability has more customization and a more feature based dashboards but not as user friendly to navigate
Chose IBM Cloudability
Flexera Cloud Management Platform
ProsperOps
Chose ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of …
Best Alternatives
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM CloudabilityProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
Good tool to start FinOps journey in a medium sized (or above) company. Currently missing AI capabilities that are now available with a lot of FinOps vendors in the market. Also, apptio currently does not have FOCUS dataset nomenclature, that can be worked upon.
Read full review
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
Read full review
Pros
  • It shows the visibility into the cost and a single pane of glass for all of our cloud providers, multiple products in those multi-cloud. So it shows us our spending across the cloud by vendor, by product, and by all the tags that we have in the cloud. So it gives us visibility into many different directions in our cost.
Read full review
  • The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
  • It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
  • It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be good to see if it offers integrations with wide variety of tools like Service NOW, MS Teams, DataDog, Slack and also with cloud native Notification services like SNS etc.
  • It would be great if Apptio cloudability provides comprehensive documentation and training
  • There is scope for improvement on Enhanced cost optimization Algorithms.
Read full review
  • The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
  • When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We decided to build our own home-grown FinOps tool, but the results of the proof of concept were very promising.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Very strong tool, nearly as clunky as older tools like CloudCheckr and much more fully featured than newer tools like Pileus. It's easy to get started with drilling into data for experienced FinOps users; others end users have a learning curve, but I don't think that's specific to Apptio Cloudability. The biggest drawback I find is the tool is buggier than others (e.g. CloudHealth), and constantly having to refresh a browser makes for a poor user experience.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Only been 1 or 2 occaisions when not available, in 3 years
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Afternoons tend to be a little slower, due to US traffic I assume
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
While there have been few support cases where the experience was good. But in multiple support cases it's firstly delayed and even after weeks or months of time, team is not able to provide us with the RCA of the issue. All they are claiming is the issue is now fixed which I still see coming back after few days or weeks as we've never identified and addressed the root cause.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Training was adequate, but the real learning begins when you start using the product, like most things. All major functions were covered so as an entry point, was a good introduction to the product. The training pace was good as well, the areas were covered in decent depth, without being too much of an information overload.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Within months
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I like IBM Cloudability compared to IBM SPSS Statistics because I think SPSS is a bit outdated. In my opinion, IBM Cloudability is more modern and helps present data better than SPSS could. Compared to Microsoft 365, I would say they are about even. One thing I like about Microsoft 365 compared to IBM Cloudability is data manipulation is a bit easier with formulas which I can't say I have been able to do with IBM Cloudability.
Read full review
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities.
Read full review
Scalability
Works as designed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Apptio Cloudability has enabled us to charge back 100% of our cloud spend to our business users and on an automated basis through the use of ApptioOne
  • Apptio Cloudability's transparency and metrics have enabled us to save millions of dollars in cloud spend across our user base.
Read full review
  • Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
  • Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
  • As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProsperOps Screenshots

Screenshot of