IBM Cognos Analytics vs. RapidMiner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$10
per month per user
RapidMiner
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
RapidMiner is a data science and data mining platform, from Altair since the late 2022 acquisition. RapidMiner offers full automation for non-coding domain experts, an integrated JupyterLab environment for seasoned data scientists, and a visual drag-and-drop designer. RapidMiner’s project-based framework helps to ensure that others can build off their work using visual workflows or automated data science.
$7,500
Per User Per Month
Pricing
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Editions & Modules
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.00
per month per user
On Demand - Premium
USD 42.40
per month per user
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.60
per month per user
Professional
$7,500.00
Per User Per Month
Enterprise
$15,000.00
Per User Per Month
AI Hub
$54,000.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Considered Both Products
IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Tableau, Power BI, QlikView were the other options considered. Tableau lacked the following key components of business intelligence and analytics. Some other statistical functions that are available on the platform were not matched by Power BI. QlikView lacked robust …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We selected IBM Cognos Analytics based on the following. The scalable and robust features for large organizations allowing it to grow as we do. The nest feature is the strong data governance and security features. It also supports a wide variety of data sources. Lastly, it …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
It was due to trust in IBM. Very good support provide by IBM. Response time is pretty good
Product is proven in past & well robust feature
Many good enterprises have used this product
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
My company selected IBM Congos Analytics because of its advanced features and data representation for data analysis. Its row and column features are very effective for creating dashboards and reports to visualize data. It's chart representation and view format are very …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Not to be compared. Completely different products.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
It does well however, we need more user friendly interfaces, integration options and visualizations.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics is our legacy BI solution. It hadn't stacked up well against its modern contemporaries. We are thinking of replacing it with Microsoft BI.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Cognos provides very advanced analytics functionalities, maybe even more advanced than the competition, and works great when used in collaboration with Watson. However, Tableau and other newer products are much better regarding overall usability.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We looked at Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, and IBM Cognos Analytics for our financial brand's needs. Qlik Sense is super user-friendly, great for quick data digging. SAP Analytics is perfect when we're working with other SAP stuff; it just clicks. But for our big project, …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos comes close to Data Central. It has some pros & cons over Data Central. Pros: 1. We use the tool for data modeling as it helps in predictive data analysis for complex data, which is very much in line with real-life scenarios. 2. Has a mobile application that works …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos has a lot more deep, robust, AI-driven Business Intelligence features that remove some of the manual work. Automation is a lot more seamless and ease of making data available and digestible by several non-technical business partners.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Cognos Analytics provides wide range for reporting, data visualization, and self service analytics. Cognos has strong security and governance features. Sigma computing is purely cloud native approach and has spreadsheet like interface and doesn't provide many customization …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
I feel like IBM Cognos Analytics offers a more in depth look into the business’ analytics and data and has more functionalities with AI.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
While all of them have their own advantages. IBM Cognos Analytics is highly scalable and have unmatched data analytics capabilities which makes the data from IBM Cognos Analytics of very high quality and data governance also makes sure your data is safe and protected.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics is a relatively late entrant in the BI space - dominated by Tableau and Qlik. it works well for 80% of our use cases and is easy for a non technical user to start using. Also due to enterprise licensing, its easier to distribute internally.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
In the past Management had used Excel and Workiva capabilities to create the reporting dashboards that were being used to make decisions. Since switching to IBM Cognos Analytics the Company has been much more efficient and decision making has been streamlined. IBM Cognos …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
I like the cloud native character and ease of deployment with Sigma and ThogthSpot, I also like the metadata modelling capabilities of Power BI. I prefer the ability of Cognos to create and publish a metadata model that provides both ad hoc access and managed reporting and …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
They are better in Dashboarding and performance analysis.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft Power BI has a more user friendly interface and it is integrated very well with the other Microsoft products but IBM Cognos Analytics has a more advanced reporting and complex data analysis capabilities.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We have alot of resources already invested in Cognos and it would be a humongous effort to migrate. CA is more inline with Power BI and Tableau now that there are dashboarding capabilities.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We could deliver a corporate wide solution with Cognos, it is an end-to-end platform. No other option provided the same breadth of scope. I can't think of a feature that the others provide that Cognos lacks, but the others do not provide the same features and governance of …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
No need to physically share data with developers, users. All we need is to send the server URL.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics with Watson is an enterprise ready tool and could provide end to end functionality expected from a BI tool. Provides integration with custom applications as well as provides not just high end visualizations that Tableau or PowerBI provides but also the very …
RapidMiner
Chose RapidMiner
We tried different data tools and we figured we give RapidMinder Studio a shot as one of our employees had experience with it, and when compared to some of the other tools that we used it was the best fit among the test group that we used. Overall it was a little more fluid and …
Chose RapidMiner
For me, the best advantage to use RapidMiner is the ease of use to learn and deploy new processes. Yo don't need to code, you learn fast and it's really flexible when it comes to transforming data. Knime is also good, but not so flexible, and visually less attractive. Pentaho …
Chose RapidMiner
I found RapidMiner to be in a class of its own. It's easy to use, yet extremely powerful for full data analysis.
Chose RapidMiner
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual …
Chose RapidMiner
Used R and RapidMiner Studio. The main advantage for RapidMiner Studio is the reduced need to program. It has a much smaller learning curve, and it is easy to start using the tool and analyzing from day one.
Chose RapidMiner
RapidMiner is much easier and faster to use plus it interfaces with databases easily.
Chose RapidMiner
We selected RapidMiner due to ease of use and a comfortable user interface. It stacks up very well against these tools in the predictive analytics space. For basic analytics and data reporting, we chose QlikView and Qlik Sense as a more robust reporting platform.
Chose RapidMiner
SPSS and SAS are too expensive. Their interfaces are excellent, but the price point is quite high making them inappropriate for higher education. KNIME is my second choice tool in this space, but it doesn't have the same long established english-speaking user community as …
Chose RapidMiner
It's a heck of a lot better than Python, i.e., it's much quicker to get results with RapidMiner. And RapidMiner is less error prone that coding.
Chose RapidMiner
The best part about RapidMiner is it mainly focus on machine learning algorithms whereas other tools focus on mainly the extract transform load (ETL) process. It can serve for all the KDD (Knowledge data discovery) process stages e.g. data cleaning, transformation, modeling and …
Chose RapidMiner
RapidMIner Studio is freely available and requires no programming skills. When compared with other free analytics tools, its graphical and analytical capabilities are far superior.
Chose RapidMiner
You simply cannot do everything with RapidMiner, it is just one tool in your arsenal. I like using Python directly much better with tools such as Jupyter Notebook in conjunction with JupyterHub.
Chose RapidMiner
The problem with R was that you had to code everything yourself and it doesn't do that well with large amounts of data. At the same time the advantage it provided was it has a large user base which means that you could get help easily.
Features
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.8
Ratings
6% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
6.7
Ratings
17% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
Ratings
14% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.7
Ratings
1% below category average
RapidMiner
-
Ratings
REST API7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Visualization00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
8.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.0 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cognos AnalyticsRapidMiner
Likelihood to Recommend
I use predictive analytics techniques, which can help me predict my future sales based on collected data, giving me insight into my market's trends.This market data can be analyzed, giving me the opportunity to gain in-depth insight into my market's competition and positioning it competitively, aided by developing strategies to improve my marketing approach.
Read full review
RapidMiner is the best tool to build models on textual data. It is rich in ML algorithms and reduces the need to manually tune the parameters. It automatically optimizes them, thus providing a better solution. RapidMiner again extends great capability for data preparation, its insane connections to almost every data source pulls in the data easily into one environment. And it can comfortably perform data cleaning and process tasks over that. RapidMiner is not so good with image, audio or video data. These data points cannot be used directly in their raw form. They must be transformed into some intermediate form for performing analytics over it. Moreover, there are no connectors to directly pull data from their varied sources. For example, we don't have a connector to read audio data directly from a switch and then convert it to text (although Google speech API is available for audio to text conversion.)
Read full review
Pros
  • Data Visualization: Plenty of options exist for multiple use cases, and dashboards are easy to implement and customize.
  • Integration with IBM Watson: makes it easy to use Watson AI features (NLP etc.) on your data.
  • Its advanced analytics functionalities with powerful pattern detection/prediction models.
Read full review
  • RapidMiner Studio offers a superb user interface with an intuitive workflow paradigm that is very easy to learn.
  • RapidMiner Studio’s operators make it a complete and powerful tool for data preprocessing, data visualization, and data mining/analytics.
  • RapidMiner Studio provides excellent documentation, countless worked examples, training and support via a large user community.
  • Every problem is solved using a sequence of operators.
  • Statistical analysis capabilities offered with the T-Test, ANOVA, Grouped ANOVA, and ANOVA Matrix operators.
  • Textual data mining operators.
  • Web-based and cloud computing capabilities.
  • Visualization capabilities.
  • Marketplace Extensions – especially Finance And Economics.
  • Process portability.
Read full review
Cons
  • API integration is not upto the mark with very limited options.
  • Laptops get overheated when the tool is used from moderate to heavy use. Also, there is a lag in the tool times.
  • Licensing & Maintenance can go from cheap to expensive depending on the scope.
  • Lot of scope to improve the customer support & its not upto the industry standards.
Read full review
  • Wish the tool was more efficient in terms of processing power. The tool takes a lot of CPU processing power, even for a small process on a small data set
  • Wish there were more options on charts and graphs to visualize the data
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It took my BI team one year to become productive at developing useful content on the IBM Cognos platform. After this year, the reports being developed for a client were stale and no longer relative to the ever changing needs of the business client. Given the same opportunity, I would select a platform that allows the team to quickly produce BI content. Fail fast and recover quickly!
Read full review
Very fast and user-friendly tool
Read full review
Usability
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
Read full review
Very use to use and learn
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The implementation was handled very well. The initial implementation exposed a lot of disagreement between our campuses and departments as to how we define data. This was not entirely unexpected, but I thought that we did a nice job as a team to work through some of these challenges.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise reporting. Sigma shines for customizable dashboards and drill-down analysis while IBM Cognos Analytics holds an edge in data discovery and visualization.
Read full review
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual workflow and therefore it is easier to demonstrate and visualise the processes involves in getting the desired results. Visualization of workflow enhances teaching and learning. RapidMiner is rich with algorithms and online learning materials that can assist students in their self-directed learning on data preparation, machine learning, deep learning, text mining, and predictive analytics. Moreover, RapidMiner repository has more than 1500 machine learning algorithms and functions that students can explore for any case study and assignments. The RapidMIner is also an open platform that can seamlessly integrates with other applications programmed with other programming languages like R and Python.
Read full review
Scalability
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The platform can be pretty pricey.
  • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
  • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
  • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
  • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
  • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
Read full review
  • We saved over $100k on our direct mail program by not mailing to those unlikely to respond to our mailings based on our predictive analysis.
  • Our CX team has saved countless hours by automating call scripts to isolate key phrases and code each call.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of a natural language query, used in IBM Cognos Analytics to get AI-powered insights from data.Screenshot of AI-generated insights and forecasts that can be added with just a click of a button.Screenshot of a dashboard that can be generated automatically using IBM Cognos Analytics by uploading or selecting data.Screenshot of an AI-generated dashboard from a spreadsheet that was just uploaded. This offers a great starting point for the creative process.Screenshot of where to import data to IBM Cognos Analytics from CSV files and spreadsheets. Users can connect to cloud or on-premises data sources, including SQL databases, Google BigQuery, Amazon, and Redshift.Screenshot of a sample operational dashboard of a coffee shop created using IBM Cognos Analytics.