IBM DevOps Code ClearCase vs. OpenText AccuRev

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
An enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets.N/A
OpenText AccuRev
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition, and now by OpenText.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Considered Both Products
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
Chose IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
GIT Stash is superior to IBM Rational ClearCase in many ways. Bundled with SourceTree, the UI is far more modernized and updated than IBM Rational ClearCase. Being able to visually see the individual branches that are created within the repository is much more straightforward …
Chose IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
If development is centrallized to one location and your company releases hundreds of customized versions of your software per year, then ClearCase is the best tool for managing the complexity of multiple versions of customized software. If your company has globally distributed …
OpenText AccuRev
Chose OpenText AccuRev
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools …
Chose OpenText AccuRev
Git is one obvious alternative. However, Git is leveraging the command line and has minimal interface. Developer must be acclimated with command line in order to use Git.
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
3.3
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
Rational ClearCase is well suited for a company where development is done from one single location and there are a lot of dependent projects, systems or modules that need to be version controlled. Especially good for a company that creates customized software for clients. Well suited for disciplined development environments. Waterfall methodology mentality seems a better fit for ClearCase than Agile.

ClearCase is not well suited for companies that have development geographically distributed and using Agile Methodologies.
Read full review
This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Read full review
Pros
  • Rational ClearCase is excellent for handling versioning and branching. No other tool I've used has the depth that ClearCase has when it comes to handling complex branching scenarios and identifying where certain versions of particular files are within a particular configuration.
  • Rational ClearCase handles parallel development of many dependent applications really well.
  • The use of ClearCase Views to switch between projects and configurations is extremely convenient as opposed to the local workstation model of the competitors.
Read full review
  • Creation of streams & workspaces are easy.
  • Easy integration with other bug tracking or tasking tools like JIRA.
  • File comparison and history is possible.
  • Project creation and setup is easy.
Read full review
Cons
  • Extremely buggy.
  • Sometimes the repository gets locked for no reason.
  • Slow.
Read full review
  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GIT Stash is superior to IBM Rational ClearCase in many ways. Bundled with SourceTree, the UI is far more modernized and updated than IBM Rational ClearCase. Being able to visually see the individual branches that are created within the repository is much more straightforward than the versioning method of ClearCase. GIT also seems to be a lot faster when it comes to checking in/out code and creating the repository.
Read full review
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Managed code versioning for many years.
  • Only one person can edit code at a time - slows processing down.
  • IBM is an expensive product to support.
Read full review
  • Quick merging.
  • Easy to roll back changes.
  • Good tree view.
Read full review
ScreenShots