IBM FileNet Content Manager vs. Laserfiche

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI…N/A
Laserfiche
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Laserfiche has two main editions: Rio and Avante: Laserfiche Rio is designed to meet the needs of large organizations that have more than 100 users. It combines content management functionality with business process management (BPM), security and auditing, unlimited servers and a thin-client interface. Add-ons include records management functionality, public Web portals and production-level document capture and processing. Laserfiche Avante is an ECM suite for small to medium organizations with…
$540
per year per user
Pricing
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$540
per year per user
Starter
$600
per year per user
Professional
$710
per year per user (starts at 10 users)
Professional
$830
per year per user (starting at 5 users)
Business
$830
per year per user (starts at 25 users)
Business
$950
per year per user (starting at 25 users)
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Considered Both Products
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
This is simpler and easier way to use and has simplistic UI to work with sophisticated solutions.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
While all the above-listed software is a content management system that offers document management, workflow automation, and compliance features, each has its own specialty. However, IBM FileNet Content Manager in contrast to these products is more user-friendly, has a lower …
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
We used Dropbox for collaboration files for awhile, but it felt messy. We still use it, but it's mostly for large file storage now.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
More integration and collaboration possible. Overall userfriendly and the acceptance is great. A lot of functionality to streamline processes and save time consuming evaluations. At the end of the day way more use cases and interaction which is always great for global acting …
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
IBM FileNet Content Manager unlike other similar products, it has advanced security features like ACLs and digital signatures that help our organization protect our content from unauthorized access. It is highly scalable as it can handle large volumes of content and users. It …
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
IBM FileNet Content Manager is a much superior product compared to anything in the market, IBM AI is really great and the ability to automate is really awesome. We also use other IBM products such as RPA and it integrates seamlessly. Compliance is really the USP of IBM FileNet …
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
It is much better because you can mold it to fit any document management requirement, however with this comes the requirement to put in place an effective taxonomy.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
Considering the enterprise applications and high utilization of content, IBM FileNet is no match for other products. Security, Search and integration is easier and more consistent in FileNet as compared to other products.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
In our application Filenet is a simpler integration and scales well.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
We selected IBM FileNet Content Manager because it is metadata centric product and very easy to use and manage it. Developing the taxonomy structure is really simple and straight forward.

Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
Not used many others like this. However, the others do seem more lightweight and easier to deploy.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
IBM is a more robust platform; the support we receive from IBM is better
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
FileNet v ApplicationXtender
FileNet - much more robust.
ApplicationXtender - far more lightweight, easier to deploy and configure. Much more limited in scope.
Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
Well we have heard of other competitive products like share point, open text, PEGA but we rely on IBM FileNet content manager because of its robust scalability it provides for business/users.
Laserfiche
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche and Skyward are two very different systems and resources, however, they are not complex and have a very basic design, format and layout. They both are easy to use, efficient and help with organization while not being overwhelming after learning the systems. The …
Chose Laserfiche
Primarily, the ease of the user comes for our colleagues as not losing time is our priority. Besides, comfortable administration is also striking to benefit from using Laserfiche. The form creation of Laserfiche in contrast to DocuWare is doing great that provides amazing …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is a much more focused product that simply and accurately fills our need for routine reporting and record keeping. By taking time to work on the design of the form you can anticipate the user's needs and possible areas where further explanation may be required. By …
Chose Laserfiche
I have not used any other product other than Laserfiche. As a user, am completely happy with the product and will keep on using the same. I am a happy customer, their product has been very very useful for my organization. I would like to give Kudos to Laserfiche Team. Keep …
Chose Laserfiche
The Laserfiche interface is very easy to use. It is very similar to uploading files on your Windows computer. With close to no training and less implementation time, it was a clear choice. Like other systems, Laserfiche does not have fancy designs or interface. This makes it …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is the best electronic repository system i have used. The search option is unlike any system ive seen. The indexing is fantastic as well.
Chose Laserfiche
I would pick Laserfiche over Procore in a heart beat. Procore claims to be documents storage and user friendly but they are complete opposite software.
Chose Laserfiche
Alaris is efficient for scanning and editing, but does not provide all of the advanced capabilities that Laserfiche offers. Laserfiche also provides top-notch training to users. Alaris is a more simple software that can be easily self-taught. Laserfiche has more than just …
Chose Laserfiche
The price compared with others was the best. It was user-friendly and had full functionality, even exceeded when comparing with other functions from similar applications.
Chose Laserfiche
The core infrastructure of Laserfiche, and the end user experience, is vastly superior. OnBase has a TERRIBLE UI and administration console by comparison. The core architecture of OnBase is also more scattered, while all Laserfiche processes go through a single service. …
Chose Laserfiche
Document capture from multiple sources (scanning, web form, email, shared folder, etc.) is easier to manage and set up in Laserfiche. Integrating with third party software for document retrieval is easier in Laserfiche. Online form creation is possible with Laserfiche. The …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is much simpler to implement and use. Its interface much more friendly, allowing our implementation time was much shorter. Hyland OnBase is much more complex and requires a much greater investment in the cost of licenses and hardware requirements.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche was already being used when I started using it many years ago, there are no benefits that the competition has that would make switching a benefit. I have used dropbox and sharefile in several situations, neither has capabilities that outweigh laserfiche.
Chose Laserfiche
I was not involved in the choice of Laserfische, I was the person in charge of the implementation of LF
Chose Laserfiche
I did not compare Laserfiche against other products because the City of Roanoke, Virginia had already purchased Laserfiche 6 years prior. Once I learned how to use Laserfiche and the benefits, I decided that we needed to upgrade to Laserfiche RIO to be able to use some of the …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is priced better and is easier to use.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is the leader in the ECM industry, and I believe will stand toe to toe with any competitor on the market. Not only is it on of the most advanced systems for an enterprise wide solution, but the cost is also very competitive. I also do not believe there is any …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is by far the leader in workflows and end user interfaces.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche solved our original government document retention concerns. Collin County has integrated Laserfiche retention rules with our Criminal Integrated Justice System for closed cases. We have also integrated Laserfiche with our Property Tax System. We are able to process …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is much faster and the optical character recognition is more accurate than Adobe Acrobat Capture. It took approximately 4 times as long to scan and store a document in Acrobat Capture as in Laserfiche. Reviewing every scan was essential in Adobe Acrobat Capture …
Features
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM FileNet Content Manager
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Laserfiche
8.5
Ratings
7% above category average
Content capture & imaging8.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving8.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document management8.40 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Records management7.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.20 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance7.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management7.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows6.60 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Artificial intelligence8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support6.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM FileNet Content ManagerLaserfiche
Likelihood to Recommend
Well Suited Scenarios: Regulatory Compliance: IBM FileNet Content Manager is ideal for industries with strict regulatory requirements, such as healthcare and finance. It helps organizations securely manage and retain documents, ensuring compliance with data retention policies. Enterprise Document Management: Large organizations that deal with extensive document volumes benefit from FileNet's document capture, indexing, and search capabilities. It simplifies document management across departments. Less Appropriate Scenarios: Small Businesses: For small businesses with limited document management needs, FileNet may be overly complex and expensive. Simpler, more cost-effective solutions may be a better fit.Simple Document Storage: Organizations primarily seeking basic cloud-based document storage without extensive workflow automation or compliance requirements might find FileNet's capabilities excessive for their needs.
Read full review
Laserfiche is perfect for businesses that need a place to appropriately store their documents digitally and want an environment to grow from. Adding Laserfiche Forms helps grow a business' ability to process their work and reach their customers easier. Laserfiche could be used for all sizes of businesses but may not be as worth it for very small businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • It has ability to access documents via a web interface without a client being installed on a device.
  • It provides robust solution for Document classification , securing documents, versioning of documents.
  • It supports storage of various document mime types which includes: MS office, images, videos etc.
Read full review
  • It's very good at giving a wide range of options for importing and exporting data, the Windows Client software alone can pull files from a windows folder, has a software printer to print documents into Laserfiche instead of to paper, has Office integration, the ability to pull photos from cameras, and has a scanner component.
  • Laserfiche Workflow is an automation tool that is very flexible and powerful, and allows a wide range of options for automating document flows and procedures.
  • Laserfiche is very good at communicating with other systems, though some systems, like big iron minicomputers, take some extra work and effort. Setting up integrations with SQL server databases are as simple as any complex IT procedure can get.
Read full review
Cons
  • Exception details are difficult to understand the root cause
  • Sweep system could be improved, custom policies should be able to schedule independently instead of subscribing it to default policies
  • Background searches are not so easy to use
  • Bulk actions do not show progress
Read full review
  • The could have better options for read only users, the minimum option for read only users is 200.
  • More competitive material of why Laserfiche is better than the other products out there.
  • They could use a more robust capture engine that could be used for unstructured documents.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We plan on renewing Laserfiche for the coming year but also have been considering a scanning and document management solution that can be purchased from our new accounting system company, we are implementing the accounting system this year. It will be a couple years before we make a decision to stay with Laserfiche or change.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It has an intuitive design that feels very natural to any user that has ever used Outlook or Windows Explorer. There are multiple ways to perform every action in order to help users with various software experiences find the shortcuts and actions they seek quickly and effectively.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I am very satisfied with Laserfiche. I have found that certain larger jobs may are slow. This may also be related to our infrastructure environment. We have been able to tune Laserfiche to increase performance on larger jobs.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Performance, of course, is largely dependent on the underlying environment. Laserfiche does its part with multi-threading, taking advantage of multi-core servers on scanning, workflows, and bots. A SQL-Server back-end is suitable for small to medium-sized company, but may not scale to large, where Oracle would be the better choice. Workflows can be poorly written and perform recursive work slowing down the system. It's better to run batch type workflows at night when possible.
Read full review
Support Rating
It's a great tool for our legacy system however the implementation, management time and lack of a niche provided by IBM makes it a difficult tool to recommend in a fast-paced market.
Read full review
I have never had to wait for help from Laserfiche. If I cannot find the answer online, I can easily send an email to a customer support representative. I have always been helped the same day and my questions have always been resolved. The Empower conference is always a great learning opportunity and the online resources and webinars are top-notch.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Easily accessible 24/7 so am able to complete courseware whenever time allows: Commute to work; waiting for friends or family; at night while relaxing [with a delicious glass of wine!]; whenever and wherever time and circumstances permit. Courseware is well written and presented in an easy to follow and understand format.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM FileNet Content Manager unlike other similar products, it has advanced security features like ACLs and digital signatures that help our organization protect our content from unauthorized access. It is highly scalable as it can handle large volumes of content and users. It can be scaled up or down as needed to meet its specific needs.
Read full review
Laserfiche is a much more focused product that simply and accurately fills our need for routine reporting and record keeping. By taking time to work on the design of the form you can anticipate the user's needs and possible areas where further explanation may be required. By prefilling the most likely/desired report responses you can greatly reduce the amount of time a user spends completing each report.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Automation and standardization of workflows have led to fewer data entry errors, particularly in patient records and billing.
  • Ensured HIPAA compliance
  • With the powerful search and indexing capabilities of FileNet, the time spent searching for documents has decreased dramatically.
  • The automation of document workflows has significantly reduced manual tasks and the associated human errors.
Read full review
  • The centralized repository of digitized documents allows users from different departments to collaborate and use the same documents, effortlessly and seamlessly. This has been a tremendous value to organizational efficiency and accuracy.
  • Business Process Automation has increased the capacity of a fixed workforce. By reducing the workload of individuals on repetitive tasks, it allows them to work on higher-value tasks.
  • Business Process Automation increases accuracy as well by defining a clear process with forms, emails, and document routing on each step. This leads to greater worker productivity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM FileNet Content Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of Editing in Microsoft Word - Collaboration in real time using Microsoft Office for the web.Screenshot of External file sharing - Securely share with external users.Screenshot of Annotation and redaction - Features an advanced viewer used to create annotations and apply redactions to content.

Laserfiche Screenshots

Screenshot of Laserfiche Records ManagementScreenshot of Change of Major/Minor Request created with Laserfiche FormsScreenshot of Student Information Sheet created with Laserfiche FormsScreenshot of Laserfiche Quick Fields ScanningScreenshot of Laserfiche Quick Fields ScanningScreenshot of Laserfiche Mobile Repository