TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM FileNet Content Manager vs. Microsoft SharePoint

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM FileNet Content Manager

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI…N/A

    SharePoint

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.

    $5

    Per User Per Month

    Pricing
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Plan 1
    $5.00
    Per User Per Month
    Plan 2
    $10.00
    Per User Per Month
    Office 365 E3
    $20.00
    Per User Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    IBM FileNet Content Manager unlike other similar products, it has advanced security features like ACLs and digital signatures that help our organization protect our content from unauthorized access. It is highly scalable as it can handle large volumes of content and users. It …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    We selected IBM FileNet Content Manager because it is metadata centric product and very easy to use and manage it. Developing the taxonomy structure is really simple and straight forward.

    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of IBM FileNet Content Manager and Microsoft SharePoint
    Feature
    IBM FileNet Content Manager
    7.9
    23 Ratings
    Microsoft SharePoint
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging8.419 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.621 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management8.423 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management7.321 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.221 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration8.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.720 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.822 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.918 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows6.619 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence8.116 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support6.715 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.421 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (23 ratings)
    9.5
    (194 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (21 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (17 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (11 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.1
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.2
    (17 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)