TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM FileNet Content Manager vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM FileNet Content Manager

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI…N/A

    OpenText Content Suite Platform

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AThe OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    FileNet v ApplicationXtender
    FileNet - much more robust.
    ApplicationXtender - far more lightweight, easier to deploy and configure. Much more limited in scope.
    Incentivized
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of IBM FileNet Content Manager and OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Feature
    IBM FileNet Content Manager
    7.9
    23 Ratings
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    7.6
    6 Ratings
    Content capture & imaging8.419 Ratings9.36 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.621 Ratings8.96 Ratings
    Document management8.423 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Records management7.321 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.221 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration8.023 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.720 Ratings4.25 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.822 Ratings6.45 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.918 Ratings9.76 Ratings
    Automated workflows6.619 Ratings7.15 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence8.116 Ratings4.24 Ratings
    Mobile support6.715 Ratings4.94 Ratings
    Integration8.421 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (23 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.2
    (17 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)