IBM Kubecost vs. Platform9 Managed OpenStack

Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8

Incentivized

If you're having OnPremise Infrastructure and you want to use OpenStack in that case Platform9 Managed OpenStack is recommended to use it will cut down all the complexities of setting up and managing OpenStack IaaS. Platform9 also offers setting up OpenStack on Cloud Such as AWS, GCP, and Azure but wouldn't recommend using this kind of offering as Openstack performs well when underneath virtualized infrastructure is backed directly hypervisors not cloud providers.

Incentivized

• Show namespace level cost and usage
• Allow rightisizibg At namespace level
• Show effectiveness of current resources allocation

Incentivized

• It removes all the Openstack complexities and provides a simple UI to the end user.
• Reduced the pain of System Administrator and Engineers.
• Highly responsive support.

Incentivized

• Agents installation and the ping fed integration
• The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use

Incentivized

• User interface and User experience are not upto the mark. UI needs lots of improvements.
• We need to do entire setup from the scratch.
• Nothing as such other than UI Improvements.

Incentivized

Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers

Incentivized

• Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency
• Save on cloud investment

Incentivized

• Platform9 simplified scaling in and out hypervisors now adding capacity takes very less time than other OpenStack environments.
• Platfrom9 Managed Openstack gives us feeling of having our own private cloud!
• It has increased the availability of our infrastructure which resulted lessen downtime on workloads deployed on top of it.
• Overall it benefited us in all means.

Incentivized