IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities vs. Procore

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Procore
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Procore is a project management software designed specifically for the construction industry. Procore is cloud-based and allows unlimited users per instance, so that construction team members and stakeholders can all access project information and documents.N/A
Pricing
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Custom Bundle
Custom Quote
annually
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProcore charges an upfront annual fee by product and based upon Annual Construction Volume (ACV) - the aggregate dollar value of the construction work across the customer's projects. Procore contracts include access for unlimited users, customer support, unlimited data storage, and product enhancements, at no additional cost. Multi-year pools: Contract volume is set for the entire multi-year term and can be consumed at any time during that period to help smooth out variability in consumption. Volume opt-in: Up-front contractual pricing is put in place for additional volume that might need to be added mid-term, to increase predictability of costs. Renewal rate protection: Up-front setting of rates is locked now, so businesses can budget accordingly for future renewals and improve cost predictability in future years.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Considered Both Products
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Chose IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Chose IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
They are similar and Tririga probably is a little advanced but other tools such as Manhattan is probably better. I've demo'd that product and it has some valuable attributes. I'd work with either given their capabilities but believe that Tririga could use some updating. I like …
Chose IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
I haven't used any similar products but the legacy software that was in use was very limited in auditing capabilities and was not very user friendly or easy to learn. TRIRIGA was mostly selected because it allowed the client a large amount of possible growth. They could …
Procore
Chose Procore
Procore is far more userfriendly and adaptable than Plangrid or CMIC. It's a much more intuitive platform with better functionality and ease of use.
Chose Procore
Using Procore is very easy and manageable. You can always teach a newly hired once for them to navigate it easily. Also, with price range wise Procore is widely used in other cities for integration of zero paper waste for plans and documents which time manually also helping the …
Chose Procore
have not branched out in depth to other products of similar material
Chose Procore
Procore was the only product we considered, as most of our customers and engineers in our industry (HVAC) and area use the same software.
Chose Procore
Procore is far easier and more advanced than Aconex.
Chose Procore
Procore Primary Focus: Comprehensive project management for construction projects. 1. Our Story / Who We Are - Procore Design www.procore.design Key Features: Project management, document control, quality assurance, safety management, and collaboration tools. 1. What is …
Chose Procore
I don't really view open space as a competitor. But I do see it as a great as built source of information. Procore lacks giving me live as built information on Architecture (primarily) and other trades installation not being accurate to the drawings. I don't view it as a …
Chose Procore
I had originally picked PASKR over Procore because it was less expensive and seemed to be more comprehensive, but it turned out to be not as useful for Subs and our workers so I switched to Procore.
Chose Procore
Procore still exists and appears it will for a long time. Developments are steady.
Chose Procore
Procore has more of what we use to get the project done from start to finish.
Chose Procore
Procore has a few upgraded bells and whistles but essentially it is the same type of Construction management software and functions similarly. The ability to integrate with our current accounting system is very attractive to us as well. We originally chose Procore because …
Chose Procore
Bluebeam Revu for project markup - not as many functionalities as Procore, Procore is much broader
Jobber - not as specifically tailored to my industry, Procore is a much better fit for construction management
Chose Procore
Procore has the most modules for a more complete solution, but that does not necessary equate to addressing all complex needs from different customers.

In my opinion, solutions stated will be as good as Procore in 2-5 years time, when comparing to modules/capabilities offerings
Chose Procore
Viewpoint Team was much slower when uploading docs/photos and navigating through the windows. It also didn't have a meeting minutes function which is very important for us. The interface was easy to understand but it was just clunky and slow.
Chose Procore
I've used eDocs and E-Builder in the past, and they were so ancient, and cumbersome. They were painful to use. Procore has an advantage because it's a newer company, built on a more modern tech stack, so they're aren't encumbered by old technology. They iterate ALL the time, …
Chose Procore
We replaced Mercatus with Procore. Procore is much more user friendly, not even close
Chose Procore
CMiC Construction Platform, Viewpoint Vista and GCPay
Chose Procore
Procore is over priced, and other competitors have come a long way.
Features
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Procore
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Procore
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Procore
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Procore
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Meeting Minutes00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Procore
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Takeoff tools00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Job costing00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cost databases00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Cost calculator00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Bid creation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesProcore
Likelihood to Recommend
Tririga is well suited for companies who want to manage space, projects, and work. It could use some updating in the area of streamling the pop up boxes. In order to get into an area, it could take as many as 5 + areas to get to it, which makes things time consuming.
Read full review
It works great for project management and putting all job-specific documents in one place. We are able to share drawings, submittals, and forms with our customers and subcontractors in a safe and reliable platform. However, getting reporting data is somewhat lacking, so if your business needs advanced options, you might try and find a better product.
Read full review
Pros
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
  • Submittals, Easily able to track and keep a running record of documentation.
  • RFI's ability to track costs and impacts to the project in one useful tool.
  • Keeping all items for a job in one location. I love that Procore is my one-stop shopping for all items related to my project.
Read full review
Cons
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
  • Downloading drawing sets sometimes involves an extra step that holds up the process
  • The dashboard is simplistic to the point that I don't feel like I am getting enough information about a specific project from the get-go
  • Granting access to a project on Procore is not very straightforward as a consultant- restrictions sometimes cause hold-ups
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
That's exactly what we did few weeks ago. Major point for this was pricing, it's really flexible and depend on the size of your company. You can also customize the tools that you want. Another point is constant updates, all tools are improving non-stop, Procore really listens to it's customers and implements ideas that they offer via support page
Read full review
Usability
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
90% of Procore is very intuitive and any user can pick it up and go. There are a few elements, more so on the Financials side that need some prior knowledge of systems in order to understand how and why it functions as it does. Once this is understood, it flows effortlessly
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
If you are working in an area with little to no signal, Procore will still allow you to get in the system and use it fully and will then update once you are at a place with a strong enough signal. Whether it be with wifi or LTE cell phone reception.
Read full review
Performance
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
For the most part Procore is very responsive. However there are times when it's a little slow but it's minimal.
Read full review
Support Rating
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
General Support for Project Management and Financials is consistent. The ERP support is never consistent and I do end up at times in a black hole. I have to continually reach out to get the issue resolved or get an update. The ERP support needs more of Procore's attention
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Procore's Implementation Team does a great job of ensuring users are confident in using the system. They run through a process of training sessions based on the tools you have purchased, and lay ou ta plan to help the power users configure the tool to suit the company's needs. They provide useful resources for certifications, support and ongoing training as well.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Procore's certification program and focused how-to training videos allowed for easy training that did not feel overwhelming. The way the certification programs were broken up into small parts made it seem much less daunting to complete. The training feels focused and does not overload users with too much information all at once.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
The hardest part about the implementation of Procore was getting all of our subcontractors uploaded into Procore and getting the correct contacts in for bidding. All of this information was with different people throughout our company, so getting it all into Procore and making sure it was correct was quite a challenge and caused the most growing pains for us. It was one of the reasons we had to wait to implement bidding because we couldn’t take the risk of sending out RFPs to people that weren’t correct or weren’t going to use Procore.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
I don't really view open space as a competitor. But I do see it as a great as built source of information. Procore lacks giving me live as built information on Architecture (primarily) and other trades installation not being accurate to the drawings. I don't view it as a negative, but as a potential support that may help.
Read full review
Scalability
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
You can use Procore to any level of business. I work with much larger companies that use Procore at a much higher level and very effectively
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • TRIRIGA has provided the client with the capability to correct deficiencies in the legacy software and to provide excellent reporting to give management the tools needed to make better informed decisions regarding their company.
  • Negatively it has been a very big draw on resources to implement because the client is trying to implement 5 modules in a 15 month period.
  • Another positive thing TRIRIGA has provided is it has broken objects into separate items that can each be audited. For example the legacy software only tracked one budget amount and if that was changed the system didn't say who or what was changed. TRIRIGA gives a break down of what line item is changed, who did it, and when. Properties can be changed to track what the pre-change and post-change data was. This is a great feature for auditing purposes.
Read full review
  • The Procore service impacts on construction projects are effective and reliable on production acceleration.
  • The collaboration is stable and easy files access and uploading of engineering drawings and plans is excellent.
  • New project planning and project financial data management on Procore functions are excellent.
Read full review
ScreenShots