IBM Maximo Application Suite is an enterprise asset management (EAM) platform.
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.
Plant number concept in Ellipse will be missed. Change to IBM Maximo Application Suite has provided opportunity to break from old (bad) habits and re-engineer system processes with usage more aligned to system design Main reason we are changing is to find a COTS solution for …
IBM Maximo Application Suite has all the applications available within one soluiton. You can use more or less based on your need and how your company is evolving.
IBM Maximo and IBM TRIRIGA are both very similar in nature and both applications are great. However; having used almost all of the modules in TRIRIGA, I believe that for large scale asset and facility work order solutions MAXIMO offers greater out of the box capabilities over …
IBM Maximo Application Suite, for the options we selected, was less expensive and offered more "in-product customization". This allowed us to modify to our needs and also continue to implement regular patches without special testing or a "blessing" by the application provider …
With the help of IBM Maximo Application Suite, businesses can increase their operations' effectiveness, cut downtime, and increase the longevity of their assets.
It’s a cost effective solution for Enterprise Resource Planning Compared to other ERP tools like SAP. Adaptable to small and medium scale industrial environments where cost is a factor. ROI is very minimal due to its initial cost for implementation.
As a computerized maintenance management system i do not have experience of any other system. The only experience I have is for Maximo and it works excellent for me. I am using many modules available in Maximo and all of these modules are almost fulfilling all of my business …
SAP is a fantastic, fully integrated solution with a very high licensing cost - Maximo can generally deliver most of what a company needs for a better price.
IBM Maximo stacks up very well against its competitors, as it has the scale to handle any asset management issues and captures everything a business may want to know about what is going on with its assets. Being part of IBM means that it has the power and reliability that comes …
Complementing IBM Maximo as compared to other ERP software in the market is the ease of use with a user-friendly web-based interface and improved skin that makes navigation and moving within applications easy. Powerful and robust applications such as Work Orders, Assets, …
Multicustomer support where multiple customers access a single instance of a service management solution with full access to the data and services they manage and the appropriate data segregation in place to keep them from accessing data and services that they do not manage. …
Magnificent with its electrifying features with tuning, monitoring, and repair of the database. Terrific with tracking IT assets. Great for its power to secure and encrypt databases. Reliable with the discovery of networks.
Ease of configuration is a credible feature from the application, as we have the flexibility of personalizing the software for our needs. Also, IBM Control Desk captures the software problems and issues us with extensive answers for them. The communications that IBM Control …
SysAid disconnects in every 5-10 minutes which can be overcome by IBM Maximo. Ticket creation in SysAid is very difficult compared to Maximo. An additional training is required for the new users to use SysAid. Maximo is more essential and user friendly compared to SysAid.
Maximo is a good tool and, as I suggested, it is the system of choice for us. We continue to explore opportunities where we can replace our legacy systems in risk management and field mobility with Maximo. Maximo has to work harder to provide a clear picture of how we can do …
They are similar and Tririga probably is a little advanced but other tools such as Manhattan is probably better. I've demo'd that product and it has some valuable attributes. I'd work with either given their capabilities but believe that Tririga could use some updating. I like …
I haven't used any similar products but the legacy software that was in use was very limited in auditing capabilities and was not very user friendly or easy to learn. TRIRIGA was mostly selected because it allowed the client a large amount of possible growth. They could …
I would recommend Maximo to organizations with the patience and budget for long-term returns. It is not an easy platform to learn at first, but if you invest the time, it pays you back tenfold. It is not for people looking for a simple solution; this is a tool built for serious asset management.
Tririga is well suited for companies who want to manage space, projects, and work. It could use some updating in the area of streamling the pop up boxes. In order to get into an area, it could take as many as 5 + areas to get to it, which makes things time consuming.
Extensive asset tracking and management. IBM Maximo is extremely capable of handling all sorts of assets so you can track every detail and part of the lifecycle of an asset inside an organization.
Highly customizable. If the broad array of possibilities inside IBM Maximo still isn't suited for your specific application, it is possible to customize it to a very high degree so it can fit the needs of your organization.
Preventive maintenance and services. With IBM Maximo, it is possible to schedule all sorts of preventive maintenance for your equipment, maximizing the uptime of your systems and machinery and minimizing unforeseen events.
In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
IBM MAS is the leader in the EAM space. They continue to evolve with the newest technology to stay on the forefront of cutting edge asset management. Their continued international growth and market share demonstrate the effectiveness of the product, its ease of use, and the return on investment of new functionalities.
The IBM Maximo Application Suite is well known for inventory management solutions. This solution is in use by many corporations but mostly I have seen its use in Ports, defense and aerospace industries. Some of the benefits are 1. asset tracking is amazing 2. Maintenance cost is less 3. Reduced inspection costs 4. Less downtime 5. It allows customization 6 Simplify data management 7. Highly adaptable
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
I have regularly contacted IBM Support to report issues and raise requests for issues we face during project implementations. The response from them has overall been good and to the point, and they get back to us within a day or 2 and guide us through the process of fixing it or providing an interim fix of the product
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Implementation of IBM MAS as a service provider has been easy. The functionality in the OEM space has been the best of its class with all related modules and application subject to maintenance
SAP Plant Manager. We’re working a lot in critical infrastructure, so in Europe it’s not allowed by law to put asset data in the cloud, especially when it’s connected to geolocation. SAP is moving to the cloud, and IT is a cloud-only solution. So that’s the advantage of Maximo, and that’s why we’re sticking with it.
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
A Significant improvement in Tracking and Managing Assets with a History of PM Work Orders, Asset transfers, and maintenance costs linked to procurement and inventory usage
Record accurate labor work hours with proper people management while not missing any schedules and appointments
With the Cost Management and Budgeting application, it has allowed budget controllers to make timely and proper decisions in preparing budgets, booking costs, track commitments and over commitments, and make deliverable forecasts
TRIRIGA has provided the client with the capability to correct deficiencies in the legacy software and to provide excellent reporting to give management the tools needed to make better informed decisions regarding their company.
Negatively it has been a very big draw on resources to implement because the client is trying to implement 5 modules in a 15 month period.
Another positive thing TRIRIGA has provided is it has broken objects into separate items that can each be audited. For example the legacy software only tracked one budget amount and if that was changed the system didn't say who or what was changed. TRIRIGA gives a break down of what line item is changed, who did it, and when. Properties can be changed to track what the pre-change and post-change data was. This is a great feature for auditing purposes.