IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Oracle Exadata

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Netezza Performance Server
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Netezza Performance Server (NPS) is an add-on data warehouse solution available on Cloud Pak for Data System platform, built over open source and optimized for High Performance Analytics with built-in hardware acceleration. Netezza Performance Server was previously named IBM Performance Server for PostgreSQL (IPS).N/A
Oracle Exadata
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Exadata is an enterprise database platform that runs Oracle Database workloads of any scale and criticality with high performance, availability, and security. Exadata’s scale-out design employs optimizations that let transaction processing, analytics, machine learning, and mixed workloads run faster. Consolidating diverse Oracle Database workloads on Exadata platforms in enterprise data centers, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), and multicloud environments helps organizations increase…
$2.90
Per Unit
Pricing
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Database Server
$2.9032
Per Unit
Quarter Rack
$14.5162
Per Unit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Considered Both Products
IBM Netezza Performance Server
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
Data internet for IBM Netezza Performance Server is quite straightforward compared to Amazon Redshift due to it’s complexity of features.
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
With a simple user interface and access to IBM's online instructions, Netezza Performance Server is easy to operate. It also has built-in contribution facilities, as well as good customer
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
Netezza Performance Server is a virtuoso because it is available on IBM Cloud, AWS, and Azure, and also provides enhanced data security with self-encrypting disks and support for the Kerberos authentication mechanism with IBM PureData System for Analytics Netezza appliances.
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
Dataload and compression features are handled easier in Netezza compared to Teradata. 600+ users can operate at the same time with no issues whereas in Teradata it breaks after such a load. Easy to manage huge queries of code in Netezza compared to Teradata. ROI is effective …
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
Netezza is sufficient against similar products. It comes down to personal preference, I'd love to have the data objects popping up as I type but some people may not like it.
Chose IBM Netezza Performance Server
IBM Netezza Data Warehouse Appliances is well suited for use by a larger organization wanting to solve the business problems related to the collection, transformation, and dissemination of our company's business process information. These means the small data sets or data …
Oracle Exadata
Chose Oracle Exadata
A unique architecture of Oracle Exadata machine which consists of several components: compute, storage cells with offloaded SQL processing within the cell, smart cache. In addition it is an Oracle RAC server with high speed interconnect between its built-in nodes.
Chose Oracle Exadata
Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service allocates built-in cloud automation and enhances enterprise-class business continuity by enhancing zero downtime maintenance which is contrary to other alternatives such as Apache Hive.
Chose Oracle Exadata
Oracle Exadata Database Machine had the best performance overall hands down. It clearly beat the competition and we were seeing 1000X improvement on SAP HANA. Oracle Exadata Database Machine beat that without us refactoring our code. To achieve that in HANA, we had to …
Chose Oracle Exadata
No. we have not used any other products.
Chose Oracle Exadata
IBM POWER System is a general purpose hardware optimize to runs various software with high-performance resource intensive operations. On the other hand, Oracle Exadata Database Machine is specifically engineered to run Oracle Database software efficiently, this combination of …
Chose Oracle Exadata
IBM AIX and HP-UX implementations of Oracle database solutions have a lot of performance issues. Both do not provide as much robust configuration customization as Exadata. Hardware support is limited. There is generally a long delay between hardware update being certified with …
Chose Oracle Exadata
For high performance, highly available, critical applications running on Oracle databases, there is no alternative.
Chose Oracle Exadata
We have done a proof of concept for both and have seen a lift with our batch processing and all other aspects with Oracle Exadata. Oracle Exadata storage servers have been playing a key role with the overall success compared to other products.
Chose Oracle Exadata
We selected it just from a performance perspective, and that the ROI with the Oracle Exadata Database Machine is bigger than other machines. You can run with it for at least 5 years.
Chose Oracle Exadata
For large-scale reporting and ETL needs, Oracle has been more responsive and allowed for easier integration with 3rd party vendors.
Chose Oracle Exadata
I do not think there is any alternative for Exadata. Flash storage or SSD can not solve the IO bottleneck issues the way Exadata handles the IO subsystem.
Chose Oracle Exadata
We had already chosen Oracle Exadata, so we didn't compare this solution with other products.
Chose Oracle Exadata
Have not used an alternative to Oracle Exadata Database Machine to compare to.
Chose Oracle Exadata
Exadata beats the competition because the smart scan and offloading technology is more about software than hardware, so you cannot just buy a beefy server and add flash disks to compete. The Exadata software is what makes it special.
Features
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Netezza Performance Server
-
Ratings
Oracle Exadata
10.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Warehouse
Comparison of Data Warehouse features of Product A and Product B
IBM Netezza Performance Server
-
Ratings
Oracle Exadata
9.3
Ratings
19% above category average
High-Volume Data Processing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Warehouse Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Administrative Automation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-Optimization00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Small Businesses
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.4 out of 10
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Exadata
Oracle Exadata
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Netezza Performance ServerOracle Exadata
Likelihood to Recommend
Netezza Performance Server enhances the data scientist's ability to rapidly design, train, and deploy machine learning models in the database. Netezza Performance Server is essential for implementing cognitive machine learning, providing data scientists with in-database analytics, and enabling them to collaborate on a single platform. Netezza Performance Server supports the use of built-in Spark as well as Python and R for rapid and sophisticated data science and machine learning adoption at scale.
Read full review
  • First, get the database on Oracle. If you are in an Oracle stack, it would be much better to use the Oracle products. If you are driving a Ferrari, you wouldn’t put a Mercedes engine in it. If you are writing a query, you cannot rely on other brands. Since I'm an architect, when I look for a product, I look for performance.
  • The installation is easy because it comes out-of-the-box and you just start using it.
  • Previous to Oracle Exadata, we were using a normal Oracle RAC service. We were just waiting for this product to come out.
  • I'm currently writing a data warehouse on Exadata. Before this solution, we were aiming for this to be completed by 8 a.m., when our ETLs would finish. With the help of Exadata's special features, this was reduced to 3 a.m. This solution allows us to bring more data within the same time period. It provides us with more subject areas that provide more reports to our users. Our ETL times reduced to 65%, then to 50%.
Read full review
Pros
  • The speed of operations is really second to none
  • The data control aspect is really effective and very useful
  • Stability and no latency issues notices during operations
Read full review
  • Customize-able for specific functionality optimized for combination of online transaction or analytical processing.
  • Ability to serve mix workloads with resource management feature enables prioritizing allocation for certain workload.
  • Scale-able on-premise with compatibility for cloud deployment offers flexible solution for organization considering to transition from on-premise solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is expensive for medium-sized and smaller companies.
  • IBM could bring back the technical account managers.
  • The procurement process is a hassle.
Read full review
  • Patching can often become quite involved and convoluted. It should be more transparent and straightforward.
  • Storage metrics can be difficult and time consuming to obtain.
  • Basic administrative functions can be hard to repair when discovered.
  • Vendor support can take a while to obtain. Generally several attempts are necessary to reach the right area of vendor expertise.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Excellent machine for your database needs . Don’t have to think twice if you have the budget to own it
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
With a simple user interface and
access to IBM's online instructions, Netezza Performance Server is easy to
operate. It also has built-in contribution facilities, as well as good customer
support, to make the DBA's job easier.
Read full review
A unique architecture of Oracle Exadata machine which consists of several components: compute, storage cells with offloaded SQL processing within the cell, smart cache. In addition it is an Oracle RAC server with high speed interconnect between its built-in nodes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It allows us to work together simultaneously in the database to query our custom results.
  • It requires users to know the object name as it does not pop up in their text editor. Thus, users take more time in writing queries.
Read full review
  • Single support from a single vendor with both machine and database from Oracle, which is costing us less.
  • With Exadata, we need less technical manpower and less technical support. A business transaction with the integrated and centralized database helps us focus on other business needs.
  • We don't need to buy additional licenses and Hardware for the next 3 to 5 years.
Read full review
ScreenShots