IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks vs. Junos Space Network Management

As service providers in Information technology, IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks has been of priceless value in management of virtual networks. It is crucial to improve our flexibility in administration of networks regardless of the usage bandwidth whether around the company or on our clients' networks. If you are looking to improve agility and configuration of your networks, then IBM would be the best SDN for that.

Incentivized

Junos Space is an excellent tool for network management. I really did not find anything to dislike about this platform as it was able to manage, simplify and automate all [the] devices. I recommend [Junos Space] because it is a platform that has a complete solution as it provides you with a complete fault manager and excellent performance and security.

• Improved security of virtual machines with SDN central control.
• Flexible in adjusting network configuration.

Incentivized

• Automate all security devices
• Productivity and ease of management
• Multilayered network abstractions

• Low performance while managing overlay Model SDN.
• The SDN controller is always vulnerable to attacks, but its only natural considering it is a potential single point of failure. We have to pay more for a SOAR to improve security.

Incentivized

• It is an expensive platform unlike other vendors.

IBM is a company that has a lot of experience in networking services, in addition to having a better integration with other products of the same brand, for this reason we use IBM Networking Services

Incentivized

• Amazing control over security. Policies are set from a central place that determines access control and security across the network.
• Managing networks is much easier through direct programming.

• Hot-Pluggable, Multitenant Applications
• Instant Scaling and Resilience
• Flexible Network Visualization