IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks vs. VMware NSX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Networking Services for Software-defined Networks (SDN) transforms hardware and device-centric network to a virtual, software-defined network for improved agility, security and cost efficiency.N/A
VMware NSX
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
VMware NSX is network virtualization technology. VMware NSX is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.N/A
Pricing
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Considered Both Products
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks
Chose IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks
IBM is a company that has a lot of experience in networking services, in addition to having a better integration with other products of the same brand, for this reason we use IBM Networking Services
VMware NSX
Chose VMware NSX
Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP) and Juniper Contrail Networking
Chose VMware NSX
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not …
Chose VMware NSX
We use both ACI & NSX. They both provide a programmable network and in future releases of ACI they will allow you to stretch fabrics into the cloud like you can do with NSX. ACI, when compared to NSX, turned out to be significantly cheaper, but it also was lacking certain …
Best Alternatives
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 7.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Networking Services for Software Defined NetworksVMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
As service providers in Information technology, IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks has been of priceless value in management of virtual networks. It is crucial to improve our flexibility in administration of networks regardless of the usage bandwidth whether around the company or on our clients' networks. If you are looking to improve agility and configuration of your networks, then IBM would be the best SDN for that.
Read full review
Our high-security environments require end to end encryption, but also tend to have larger budgets. Since beginning utilization of VMware NSX, we've been able to meet the unique requirements for our high-security clients, but it does have a large price tag that goes along with it. This isn't a particularly well-suited solution for environments with tighter budgets, but it definitely provides security where we need it and are willing to pay for this solution
Read full review
Pros
  • Improved security of virtual machines with SDN central control.
  • Flexible in adjusting network configuration.
Read full review
  • Broadcast Suppression: By suppressing broadcast traffic, we have been able to deploy a single VDI network in a /18 network space, allowing for rapid growth and proper DHCP lease timing for a VDI instant clone environment.
  • Networking HA: Leveraging internal mechanisms for high availability, it provides disaster resiliency to a virtual networking environment.
  • Cost Savings: All available features of NSX are licensed simultaneously. Load balancers, firewalls, and routers are all licensed as features, not per object, allowing for the deployment of as many of these objects as are needed.
Read full review
Cons
  • Low performance while managing overlay Model SDN.
  • The SDN controller is always vulnerable to attacks, but its only natural considering it is a potential single point of failure. We have to pay more for a SOAR to improve security.
Read full review
  • Our biggest challenge is gaining acceptance from network engineers who are used to working with other technologies.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM is a company that has a lot of experience in networking services, in addition to having a better integration with other products of the same brand, for this reason we use IBM Networking Services
Read full review
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not all. It's focus relies on physical networking changes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Amazing control over security. Policies are set from a central place that determines access control and security across the network.
  • Managing networks is much easier through direct programming.
Read full review
  • Easy to manage networking and security
  • Better visibility into the environments
Read full review
ScreenShots