IBM Planning Analytics vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Planning Analytics integrates seamlessly with Cognos Analytics to support all aspects of our Financial Reporting against both dimensional (TM1) and relational and ad hoc data sources
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
cost effective solution
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Cognos is a tool that complements IBM Planning Analytics, allowing us to design dashboards and management reports
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Why IBM Planning Analytics when compared to Oracle Hyperion: Better excel integration Less data movement and duplication Better cloud offering More aforeable licensing
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Jedox, Board and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson will be up and running more quickly and be easier to maintain if modeling flexibility, scale, and the ability to plan at greater levels of detail are important requirements.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I am personally trying to explore the features of SAP analytics cloud in order to find if it's possible to integrate other sources of data and api based integrations, but I'm still on it while using the IBM planning analytics for my project currently. But looking at the intial …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I worked with Hyperion a long time ago. It was not a Oracle product yet. One great feature of this solution that was really great at the time, was the modeling process of ir, with a very robust engine for sparse cubes. the performance was excellent at the time. But today I can …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson is much more flexible and scalable in comparison. IBM PAW is the clear winner for our organization's successful planning and analysis needs.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Because of its ability in planning, budgeting and forecasting or work progress.it has made it easy in driving sales hence profitability and lowering costs,also with ability to forecast the decision making has never been made this easier.
The reasons for selecting are on its …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Compare to its competition it has good visual and graphical interface that helps to customized according to user needs. It helps to apply the best possible algorithm according to different model scenario that provides the best possible results. Predictive forecasting and AI …
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
After yeras of SAP adoption we decided to give a chance to Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik as it was a new company on the market and offers us full support to archivi our targets
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Compared to the competitors, Tagetik offered a platform mainly better in user overall experience, since this was one of the most important needs of the business. Also, reporting and data entry functionalities seemed to work better compared to the competitors, also considering …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management, IBM Cognos Controller, IBM Planning Analytics and SAP Analytics Cloud
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We use Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetikfor budgeting, reporting, and consolidation already for a couple of years. And to speed up our (monthly / quarterly) close, we recently implemented the transaction matching and account reconciliation modules from Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik. …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Similar, but with key strengths (report formats and online help and support) and some shortfalls (e.g. HFM ad-hoc reporting and smart view tools are better than those in Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik). On balance, taking into account licensing and the full cost of ownership, …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
SAP S/4 HANA is a standalone tool for databases. I don't know any other product which is that effective with the databases. but for many customers it's too expensive and powerful which also results in the knowhow is needed and otherwise its really hard to get into SAP S/4 HANA …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Better workflow capabilities Strongest solution for consolidation Easy to maintain and finance owned
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Tagetik have a better integration in all parts in our customers systems. it is a lot easier to implement the data. SAP has the problem that there is a lot of different programms and tools, which has to buy to work with a complete tool. But if one part is missing the total sap …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Jedox is a white paper - you can do anything and when you say this it is less accurate to the financial need, it asks a lot of specifics.
CCH Tagetik has a financial DNA that helps a lot.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have been using CCH Tagetik for uploading Financial data from our other ERP system such as ACCPAC, Navision, Talent etc.. My experience with SAP was using them as ERP system. Thus can't really do a lot of comparison between the two system. The main reason why CCH Tagetik was …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have had a 3-year experience with Anaplan for budgeting and performance management on part of our business. Anaplan is brilliant provided you have technical skills to manage multi-dimensional data, and
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is way more user friendly and the online help is understandable by non-IT people.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
1. Price - CCH Tagetik offers a price advantage as compared to bigger competitors.
2. Modules - CCH Tagetik is able to provide what the Finance of today needs.
3. Usability - It is not difficult to use once a user is able to grasps hold of the Tagetik concept and mechanism
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We wanted a more accounting-based solution to meet IFRS 17. There are some solutions which were fundamentally more data-based or actuarial-based, hence we wanted a solution that was fundamentally strong in accounting/ financial applications.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik was in the end the best choice for us. As I was not directly involved in the decision making process, I don't have all the details, but a combination of costanalysis, ease-of-use, migration-analysis and the fact that CCH Tagetik has a dutch office almost in walking …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has excellent multi-currency support and it enables us to plan at a low-level of detail, which is very important to us.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
A lot of integration with the other enterprise database (SQL).
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
The price of the product was a huge improvement from our previous tool
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
This product is very comparable to BPC but much more affordable and the customer service is far superior.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is more complete software and more user-friendly. The user experience is very comfortable.
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis9.80 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.70 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.80 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.70 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web9.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning9.90 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.40 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.80 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.80 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.40 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.80 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Long-term financial planning9.80 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.80 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Forecasting9.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.70 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management reporting9.70 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
21% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.70 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multi-currency management9.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations9.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Minority Ownership9.80 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.80 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.70 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.4
Ratings
15% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.80 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.70 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards9.70 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
KPIs9.80 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Flat file integration9.80 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel data integration9.80 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources9.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.7
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • The steps of setting up the loading of data is slightly painful.
  • The steps and error message while connecting the process workflow has to provide a hint on which area needed to be fixed (because it could be anywhere or anything).
  • The combination of 2 segments for the excel upload on what's needed to eliminate is yet to resolved. Which made the entire list very long.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Based on our business requirements, its current implementation and way of use (in terms of the efficiceny) it's more than certain that we will renew our contract with CCH Tagetik. CCH Tagetik increased our efficiency regarding reporting and provides more features which made it easier to take decisions. Besides of that, it provided he best solutions for reporting according to the Solvency II standards. Since this is still the case, it is also a reason to stay with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
On a general level, it is a flexible, streamlined system, that can integrate operational data with accounting data for a better financial overview and budget planning. Reporting wise, the types and the amount of data analysis available or that can be created are close to endless. Having a quicker, more flexible way of analysing data certainly means better, faster reporting and better use of the data itself.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
I have had the pleasure of attending some courses at the dutch offices of CCH Tagetik. These were very educational with excellent trainers, a very enjoyable accomodation and they helped me a lot with regards to starting to use CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate information. But as I have not used this software much and tagetik more, this is all I can say
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • It has definitely helped to standardize reporting across the company. Teams are able to pull the same reports and everything has the same feel to it.
  • Since there are so many standard reports that we are able to create, it makes the analysts jobs easier since they are not spending so much time re-creating reports.
  • With any system, there is going to be some admin work required. Creating new reports, accounts and entities does take time, but it is fairly simple and doesn't take a ton of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage