IBM Process Mining vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

The data mining used within our organization uncovered many logs, records and unnoticed processes, which resulted in a very detailed visual representation of the end-to-end processes, mapped out in sequence of events. We were able to identify a few bottlenecks which caused delays and deviations in our workflows. In short we were able to iron out the inefficiencies, which helped tremendously in deploying targeted improvements to our internal processes.

Incentivized

• As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes.
• It is easy to understand by business people

Incentivized

• Much more efficiency and control in the final reports.
• Better budget earnings.
• We also have the best supervision of the entire process of the company's work, which makes the result clear and effective.
• We can now see with more certainty all the areas that are underperforming and thus look for solutions.
• Mining of existing data is available in any application.

Incentivized

• Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources.
• It is fast to automate SAP projects
• Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify.

Incentivized

• It is not software with good scalability, I do not see improvements in its very advanced constants in its updates.
• The central structure of this tool has made it difficult to use.
• Everything works as it should when it is implemented for the development of new projects.

Incentivized

• Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly
• Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data

Incentivized

I think it is the best process mining software that can currently exist, others are similar, but do not meet our expectations, we will use it for a long time, it is a system that makes us productive with minimal manual effort, the quality of the results they are amazing.

Incentivized

The initial integration/configuration is complex and hence takes time. Once integrated it is very easy and nice to use. We can have the analytics with a very user-friendly dashboard. It provides detailed information which helps in finding causes and hence in improvement. I would say it is a very nice and user-friendly tool.

Incentivized

The customer support team has held our hand in digital transformation journey and provided the best guidance and tools. When contacted they are always ready with effective solution of the raised issue. The team visits the company regularly to audit performance of the application and provide necessary updates. They provides awareness and business risks that might arise from various business engagements and expected risks.

Incentivized

ibm is more practical than Celonis and ui path process mining because ibm effectively optimized our operation and its Accelerate productivity and less time and reduce error and due to AI its more easier than both. i personally found IBM most trusted and secure and its advance technology makes it morden.

Incentivized

SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest.

Incentivized

• It provides a great workflow, because it optimizes our processes, since it has adequate artificial intelligence that allows early detection and solution of problems, the acquisition cost is high, but with very promising and easy-to-use functions.
• Obtaining data information is ideal, since it is an automatic process, it is intuitive and you always get a good productivity, the data analysis is very detailed.

Incentivized

• Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development
• Licenses issues should be minimized

Incentivized