TrustRadius

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Rapise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
Rapise
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Discount available for annual billing (up to 10%).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Considered Both Products
IBM DevOps Test UI
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM DevOps Test UI
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional …
Rapise
MM
Moris Mendez
Ing. de Sistemas Informaticos
Chose Rapise
The main reason for choosing Rapise was that the other two options that we had tried at that time only served us for web applications and with Rapise we have greater versatility without changing the solution. In addition to the compatibility with other libraries that are …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Rapise
Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UIRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
[It's] well suited when there is someone with some degree of programming comfort.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction
  • Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects
  • Javascript based IDE is easy to learn
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience
  • Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently
  • The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view
Moris Mendez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Moris Mendez
Ing. de Sistemas Informaticos
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
The main reason for choosing Rapise was that the other two options that we had tried at that time only served us for web applications and with Rapise we have greater versatility without changing the solution. In addition to the compatibility with other libraries that are familiar to us and easy application by our team
Moris Mendez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Moris Mendez
Ing. de Sistemas Informaticos
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it.
  • As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly
  • The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives
Moris Mendez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Moris Mendez
Ing. de Sistemas Informaticos
Read full review
ScreenShots

Rapise Screenshots

Screenshot of the testing dashboardScreenshot of the integrated testing environmentScreenshot of the reporting interface