IBM Storage Fusion vs. StoneFly SCVM™

IBM Storage Fusion

IBM Storage Fusion

16 Reviews and Ratings

StoneFly SCVM™

StoneFly SCVM™

0 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Storage Fusion	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	IBM Storage Fusion is the foundation for container-native applications running on Red Hat OpenShift, which provides enterprise grade data-storage and protection services. This solution includes data services that are critical for global enterprise applications and a data driven Red Hat OpenShift environment. IBM Storage Fusion is built on a technology that provides global access to data to container applications. The application sees the data as another local file…	N/A
StoneFly SCVM™	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	The combination of enterprise-grade tools and data services make StoneFly SCVM capable of facilitating numerous use-cases and scenarios, promises the vendor. Users can configure file storage, development and test environments, archive storage, and back up storage repositories with a single interface. Users can configure on-premises/in-house data storage, remote storage repositories, and data storage tiers in public clouds (like Azure, AWS, etc.) or in StoneFly’s…	$20 per TB

Pricing

IBM Storage Fusion

StoneFly SCVM™

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Month-to-Month Subscription Plan: $20.00
per TB
Annual Subscription Plan: $240.00
per TB
3-Year Subscription Plan: $720.00
per TB

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
IBM Storage Fusion	StoneFly SCVM™
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	IBM Storage Fusion	StoneFly SCVM™
Considered Both Products	IBM Storage Fusion Verified User Anonymous Chose IBM Storage Fusion Snowflake and Amazon Redshift Incentivized Helpful? Salam Mohammed Product Solution Architect Chose IBM Storage Fusion Either Hadoop or Cassandra provides better reporting & analytics on multiple data variant but creating required data layer on these platform requires lot of coding or development effort which are easily available in IBM Fusion. Managing these environments(Cassandra or Hadoop) … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IBM Storage Fusion VMWARE VSAN has extensive features in comparison to IBM Fusion storage, but it doesn't have the capability of integrating Redhat Openshift with the application. In addition, IBM offering is a cost-effective solution in the market. Considering the stable IBM storage portfolio … Incentivized Helpful?	StoneFly SCVM™ No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	IBM Storage Fusion	StoneFly SCVM™
Small Businesses	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10	StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Storage Scale Score 6.5 out of 10	IBM Storage Scale Score 6.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Storage Fusion	StoneFly SCVM™
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Storage Fusion	StoneFly SCVM™
Likelihood to Recommend	Every new user has to get hands-on to start utilizing it Optimal. Once user understands to implementing process and technical configuration, the user will get optimal usage of IBM Fusion. Best part of IBM fusion are, easy to connect with DB(different types), Security features, creation of a data layer(as per requirement) on top of application data Incentivized Salam Mohammed Product Solution Architect Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Machine learning model training and execution was at ease Performance was good Highly scalable Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Existing AI models should be able to utilize to other use cases Incentivized Salam Mohammed Product Solution Architect Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	smoothened the process of developing new features in the existing products after migration as one single plane of console does all the job Reduced the cost in managing a dedicated storage environment On the other side, few licenses like existing backup cann't be used instead we have to rely on IBM offerings Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		StoneFly SCVM™ Screenshots