IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems) vs. TrueNAS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Storwize is a family of recognized all-flash and hybrid storage solutions designed to support the virtualization needs and application workloads of mid-sized enterprises.N/A
TrueNAS
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
TrueNAS is a network-attached storage featuring all-flash and hybrid storage editions, from iXsystems headquartered in San Jose.N/A
Pricing
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Considered Both Products
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
IBM Storewize is the best among other products available in the market. Many features such as scalability, data configuration, and data security show this system are best for our business. We can't compare it with others.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
Simpler to use. Storwize is reliable and is using IBM technology and not some unknown application. Proven performance and easy to stack and configure. Sizing is simple and the options are more than I need for my business. Rack compatibility is something you may not realize …
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
Storwize does not have the performance of FlashSystem, but it’s low cost and high capacity options make it competitive as an option for point-in-time copies and backups.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
We prefer IBM over other solutions because IBM just seems to be more resilient, easy to use, and simple to deploy. Other products may have a steep learning curve, or may be start ups with not so much reliability.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
IBM Storwize is a part of a family that is complemented by the products listed. In many negotiations, involving storage is our workhorse to ensure several businesses thanks to its balanced cost and all the benefits that we offer.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
We are using IBM Storwize storage arrays underneath IBM Spectrum Scale, they are easy to interact together, and can scale to our requirement.

Easy administration as the GUI are designed equally so it's easy to find administrative features and the easy single pane of glass GUI …
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
HPE and Hitachi.
I recommend IBM Storwize to my customers because it's an industry-proven, flexible platform with award-winning ease-of-use and high performance.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
With the latest announcements of v5K and v7K, IBM is on target with the competition out there on the market. The only [thing] missing is a great marketing campaign to sustain a 12-24 month period to whet the client's appetite. We as a partner are doing what we can to educate …
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
IBM SVC (ran for several years)
ESS E & F models (yeah those are old)
Since Storwize is based upon SVC it was a no brainer and saved us $$$$.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
We use both frequently.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
IBM Storwize is a solid product, and we will continue to use it.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
We used the old DS4xxxx series of storages and have worked with most brands of storage and I will always pick Storwize over the rest.
Chose IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)
It is an alternate platform, so having multiple vendors reduces risk.
TrueNAS
Chose TrueNAS
the features installed on the other providers solutions, TrueNAS allow just install only the featured do you need and not others you don't like or you don't need. The isolate runtime space give for plugins jail make TrueNAS a really modular NAS solution over the other …
Chose TrueNAS
Flexibility in Storage, configuration, and ability to scale the solution as needed. The GUI is straight forward. Finding help in the forums is also on point. Great community and support that you don't find with other products.
Chose TrueNAS
Netapp was too pricey, really a solution for mid to large businesses. Redhat Gluster just didn't fit for a business that was just starting - too administratively intensive as well.
Chose TrueNAS
Older model Diskstations don't have this issue but after a certain point, Diskstations will only operate without errors if you use Diskstations overpriced disks in the bays.
Chose TrueNAS
Synology and QNAP both felt to basic after trying TrueNAS, while NetApp and Fujitsu where both expensive and I wasn't convinced we would A utilize or need all the features and furthermore all the things we where going to use seemed to be something that TrueNAS simply did better.
Chose TrueNAS
TrueNAS provides a very competitively priced option. TrueNAS is an all-in-one solution providing not only storage but services to access the storage from multiple platforms and protocols.
Chose TrueNAS
FreeNAS is great system for a secure NAS facility, TrueNAS adds a lot of feature that outperform it's cousin if you are interested in containerization and in scalability too.
Chose TrueNAS
Server 2022 was familiar and up to the task, using built-in features. However, the extra bloat and features weren't necessary—and they led to the ransomware attack. TrueNAS is focused on Storage and plays well with other operating systems and servers.
Chose TrueNAS
Having a better, trusted filesystem to build upon makes a huge difference. I want to know that if something I've written is read, it was the thing I wrote. And if it can't be read, I want to know that soon and know how to repair it.
Chose TrueNAS
I like all three for different reasons. But TrueNAS fits the FOSS criteria perfectly, obviously. QNAP and Synology operate differently and fit different clients and/or different builds, and have a corporate entity supporting them. We have all 3, and TrueNAS likes friends. I …
Chose TrueNAS
Much cheaper solutions available for small business. Being that TrueNAS software is well regarded and deployed on a large number of different platforms, I get to benefit from a more robust and powerful interface. Other NAS vendors just don't do the software side as well in my …
Chose TrueNAS
The support with TrueNAS is where it really shines. You can get support that if you purchase hard drives from them, they send replacements as soon as one fails. Automatically. If you have nodes in your server they will do the same. They also do advanced replacement, you …
Chose TrueNAS
I chose TrueNAS (upgrading from FreeNas) because of the small footprint, ease of use, and reliability of the ZFS file system. The file sharing protocols supported as well as the intuitive interface all make TrueNAS a great choice for business and hobbyists alike.
Chose TrueNAS
Unfortunately, I have to give the edge to Pure and Nimble simply due to the availability of enterprise-grade hot-swappable redundant power supply units - as much as I love the TrueNAS hardware solution until that particular annoyance is addressed, I can't really consider these …
Chose TrueNAS
Our TrueNAS server came with much more performance for the price, and a great community for support.
Chose TrueNAS
User Friendly. High Availability. Centralized Backups with 3-2-1 schemas. Pricing
Chose TrueNAS
The ReadyNAS filled the bill for many years, but we had reached the limit of its expandability. The TRUENAS solution has been speedier and more reliable. Because we used old hardware it costs virtually nothing to get it up and running.
Chose TrueNAS
TrueNAS lacks some of the polish of these systems, but the cost to build a system much more powerful (CPU, RAM, network interfaces) than a Synology or QNAP appliance is remarkably lower.
Chose TrueNAS
Synology - very user friendly setup and admin - extremely easy to manage storage sharing - slower iSCSI protocol TrueNAS - stepper learning curve for setup and admin - much more complex and error prune file sharing - more capable HW (CPU speed, 10gbe) - storage protocols are …
Chose TrueNAS
When comparing prices and features with other software we found that TrueNas was offering an affordable price and more unique features. Also, cloud backup features is a live saver if you lose your data. The installation process was very smooth and the learning curve was easy. …
Chose TrueNAS
We purchased StoreVirtual appliances 6 months before they announced end of life - we were unable to expand our volumes due to product availability. We used this opportunity to look at different vendors since we needed to configure a new product anyway. Not only did TrueNAS …
Best Alternatives
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Small Businesses
DiskStation
DiskStation
Score 8.8 out of 10
DiskStation
DiskStation
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems)TrueNAS
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Storewize is widely used in organizations for on-premises with a lot of facilities that are given by this IBM Storewize. Data accessibility is very good and fast in this system. This system is available with different data services such as scalability and flexibility in data even providing security to our data.
Read full review
We have many TrueNAS units deployed and they've served us well everywhere. Our most common use case is using it as storage backing for virtual machines. We have Proxmox talking to it, as well as having it acting as the hypervisor. We've never lost data with it, even when faced with multiple disk failures. We've also always found the performance to be robust and able to handle the needs of our clients. Our clients range from libraries, to medium sized enterprises and we've always been able to make it work, and work reliably.
Read full review
Pros
  • Data processing and IO. The Storwize devices are very resilient in how they process data and do not have a drop in IO when errors occur (common errors such as disk failures and lost paths).
  • Storage efficiency management. We are able to use multiple efficiency techniques such as thin provisioning and data reduction to reduce our budget footprint.
  • Easy to use interfaces. Creating a volume and mapping to a host has proven to be a very easy process and makes onboarding less stressful for our team.
Read full review
  • iSCSI Datastores for virtualization.
  • NFS store for unix storage or backups over networking.
  • Very fast performance, sometimes outclassing SSD arrays even in NFS.
  • The ZFS filesystem has given use much greater flexibility.
  • Using their newer servers we could in theory scale to any height of required storage.
Read full review
Cons
  • As a business partner looking to provide services to keep the uptime of the Storwize, I would like to have the capability to pull reports from IBM Storage Insights to assist my clients in managing their system through it's lifecycle.
  • More knowledge out there for partners to best integrate IBM Storwize with IBM Power i. This seems to be lacking in communication from IBM.
Read full review
  • more graphical interface to admin features like plugins, jails, list are well but a tiles aproach will be better
  • allow bulk upload/download/update to Groups or user accounts from SMB shares.
  • some script language template featured to create/config/change/delete storage pools /dataset or shares .
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The software has been amazing. It has saved me a lot of headache in the past few years. Also, it's nice to knowing that if any of our current Synology devices were to die I can have an iSCSI system up and running very shortly. I didn't give a 10 score because I find their support to be rather slow and pedantic. They test many things when the answer is right in front of them. The compute sytem (not storage) we purchased from them came with pcie gen4 nvme's. They didn't work, but rather than believe me about the spec's in the motherboard manual saying the onboard was pcie3 ONLY they shipped me 2 replacements until I showed them an old pcie3 device worked just fine. The part that rather frustrated me was the machine was claimed to have been tested / burnt in. How can this be true if the server won't even boot up into the BIOS?
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The software is fairly straight forward and if you mess up the network interfaces you can login locally at the console and fix any issues that you may have had with VLANS etc denying you network access. There was a little bit of annoying issues when setting up multiple network interface cards. Rather than keeping one interface setup with DHCP, when you add a second one with a new network it disables the first. Which makes it impossible to login again. However if you wait it will revert. I learned after works that you need to set up the network cards and then go back and setup the first one again and THEN test / apply. After that it was pretty good. The summary of the devices is very nice to. You get an accurate snapshot of how well your system is doing as soon as you login
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support was responsive for opening cases. However I found solutions to simple problems took far too long. When we had a bad power supply and we had another with the exact same firmware version they should have sent replacement for both. We had to file another case for the other PSU that started dyeing the same week. They also had to do a lot of troubleshooting to replace the fans that were not behaving as they should. I'm not a home user. I know when certain things are failing and the silly hoops the jump through made it frustrating. However, once we finally got the problem identified we had parts shipped out via advance replacement which was nice.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The implementation went well after we got the boot drive working properly. The device was setup exactly as i asked with the hardware except for the boot drive. The reason I chose 9 instead of 10 was the boot drive put us back about a week for the part to arrive. I ended up using a personal drive to show them that they were wrong sending use the gen4 drives.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Simpler to use. Storwize is reliable and is using IBM technology and not some unknown application. Proven performance and easy to stack and configure. Sizing is simple and the options are more than I need for my business. Rack compatibility is something you may not realize until you install one or more of the units.
Read full review
I chose TrueNAS (upgrading from FreeNAS) because of the small footprint, ease of use, and reliability of the ZFS file system. The file sharing protocols supported as well as the intuitive interface all make TrueNAS a great choice for business and hobbyists alike.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I would like to highlight the most positive aspect I have seen in the products of the IBM Storwize family, and it is the ROI that we can choose when we offer real-time compression with the IBM V7000 family. In truth, this feature is excellent, and we have seen how customers save storage resources, rack space, power and management.
Read full review
  • Using a TruNAS integrated solution has reduced support overhead compared to using custom hardware.
  • Being cheaper than full flash storage arrays, this unit allows for a good balance of speed with its use of SSD-based caching drives.
  • The reliability of the hardware/software integration means I spend less time troubleshooting and more time doing business. Coming from a custom-built solution it is apparent that IX Systems has done some extensive testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Storwize (now part of FlashSystems) Screenshots

Screenshot of