IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. MATLAB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
MATLAB
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
MatLab is a predictive analytics and computing platform based on a proprietary programming language. MatLab is used across industry and academia.
$49
per student license
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Student
$49
per student license
Home
$149
perpetual license
Education
$250
per year
Education
$500
perpetual license
Standard
$860
per year
Standard
2,150
perpetual license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioMATLAB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Considered Both Products
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Google Cloud may be a good place but it is not as easy to understand as IBM Watson is. Google Cloud has a lot of things and it is terrifying for a beginner. You need hours of specialization for that. On other hand, anyone can start using IBM Waston just by the following …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
  • Data ingestion
  • Batch data processing
  • Built-in connectors to Python
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Anaconda and Jupyter Notebook
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is a well-established product that supports on-demand notebooks, data pipelines, and so on, however, it also comes with the learning overhead of the whole AWS stack. It does allow per-defined models, but the benefit of using IBM Watson Studio is that users are …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Organization of data, use of data, manage the data, visualize the data is easy. Use of the environment for any project. We can use python or R or Scala in the notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
It provides better user experience. All your data on cloud and does not take up space locally.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I think they are very similar but IBM Watson is not good enough yet to pay for the services that I can already get from Jupyter Notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Easy to use, but still requires a lot of coding to use. There is no ranking of models used and models are not persistent, which means you have to keep running the models again every time you leave the session. The filesystem is clunky and need to keep authorizing Google Drive …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As it offers more features and can be used for several applications like AI,ML,DS etc.,
Chose IBM Watson Studio
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
We didn’t evaluate other products but we liked what we saw in Watson Studio.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As an IBM Business Partner, we are financially incentivized to recommend and deploy IBM solutions where it makes sense to do so for the customer. Against other solutions, few have the governance and security that IBM offers, which is essential for any kind of work in highly …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
They are close, but I feel Alteryx is more of an enhanced Jupyter capability, whereas WS is more of an enterprise solution for multiple teams
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I am excited with the roadmap of Watson Studio incorporating SPSS Modeler in the offerings.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is new, and I personally think it's better than sliced bread. There's very little set up to do. Watson Studio needs to up its game against Sagemaker.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS stacks up very favourably against Watson Studio, and in fact this is what the customer ultimately chose over Watson Studio after an evaluation period due to the sophistication, maturity, security, and capabilities of the AWS components. The downsides of AWS are having to …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
MATLAB
Chose MATLAB
Those are expensive than MATLAB and their GUI is not great along with editor. However, they have more libraries set as compared to Matlab. However, the place where MATLAB adds value is its user community as well as its support and we can find solutions to any problem with …
Chose MATLAB
Apart from Matlab, I used Matematica for some of my integral evaluations. Mathematica is also a "clean" and easy-to-use software that solves symbolic math problems (even better than Matlab for symbolic math). I also used Anaconda and Spyder for my career so far.
Chose MATLAB
The commands and coding language of MATLAB reads a lot more in plain English as opposed to all the periods and other special characters that are needed when typing in Python or Java. Additionally MATLAB has several different function packages that can solve all different …
Chose MATLAB
Python with scientific tool is useful and much less expensive. However it is somewhat harder to learn and use than [MATLAB].
Chose MATLAB
When I am not using MATLAB, I use C # and OpenGL library.
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB's neurophysiological data pre-processing third-party packages are more scientifically validated compared to support for other software platforms. It also allows for writing code with a greater level of functionality and more capabilities than R-Studio, which is instead …
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB and Python are similar in capabilities. Learning MATLAB is easier, but it is expensive, whereas Python is open-source.
Chose MATLAB
It seems MATLAB has built-in functionality that is sometimes missing in Spotfire and can only be enabled in Spotfire with additional programming language like Iron Python.
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB provides a variety of options for development. The other tools or I can say simulators do not provide major functionalities as provided by MATLAB as it is used in many fields. This is one tool which is used for research and development purpose. It gains popularity with …
Chose MATLAB
GNU Octave is a widely used alternative to MATLAB which is free. I use MATLAB because I've been using it since I learned how to use it in my undergraduate. Furthermore, paid applications offer more support and oftentimes, more updates than open source software.
Chose MATLAB
While not as fully featured as other software suites. MATLAB benefits from a short learning curve while still allowing teams to build robust algorithms in short amounts of time.
Chose MATLAB
I have not used any other products like MATLAB. I have used this software for almost ten years now and it hasnt let me down. I want to learn new open source coding platforms but for now MATLAB serves all my needs and purposes.
Chose MATLAB
For complex calculations, go with MATLAB; I can't even think of how it could be done in Tableau. But if one is not familiar with scripting and only wants to visualize data with minimal wrangling, Tableau will work just fine and comes back with graphics comparable or even better …
Chose MATLAB
MatLab is better than Phython in terms of robustness of its tools, help library, online community, library of tools, ease of programming (simpler and more intuitive syntax), ease of installation and after sale service. These are really significant advantages and they are the …
Chose MATLAB
How MATLAB compares to its competition or similar open access tools like R (programming language) or SciLab is that it's simply more powerful and capable. It embraces a wider spectrum of possibilities for far more fields than any other environment. R, for example, is intended …
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB is easier to use than a program like LabVIEW. What LabVIEW lacks in simplicity, however; it makes up for in functionality. There are many programs that can do a lot more than MATLAB can. That being said, if you are looking for the easiest and most convenient way to …
Chose MATLAB
Every product has its own advantages and disadvantages. MATLAB is one which can be understood easily and fast and so that would be a reason to select it.
Chose MATLAB
Pycharm is a python coding platform, however, it is not very user-friendly. You need to know the syntax, characters, and other libraries to use it appropriately. I had difficulty understand these problems with Pycharm whereas MATLAB is very easy to use as a calculator machine. …
Chose MATLAB
Mathematica provide more modern user interface, functionality wise, they are similar
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB has a very large database of embedded functions and it is continually growing. Graphics processing is much easier than other similar product for beginners (such as Jupyter notebook and Python). Although it is not an open-source language, lots of learning materials and …
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB is extremely more user friendly than Python. Especially for engineers and scientists. With Python you need to have additional packages to do scientific computing.
Chose MATLAB
Slow for prototyping using c# and the language is not as well supported for new employee training
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Visualization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLAB
Likelihood to Recommend
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Engineering, mathematical modeling, and machine learning are all fields where MATLAB will shine. It's fast, reliable, and relatively easy to use. MATLAB is the de facto standard when it comes to producing high-quality plots. If you need to deal with large data sets, and not take forever processing them, MATLAB may very well be the tool for you!
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
  • Has robust and easy-to-use debugging tools that can help one identify problems in one's codes.
  • Rich, well-developed and efficient library of mathematical and statistical functions that one might need to develop models or perform statistical analysis.
  • A very active online user community that is a great resource in terms of seeking help when you hit a snag.
  • Great help literature (and sometimes videos too) on all tools making it possible for all to train themselves.
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
  • MATLAB should have a full free version (without time limit) in order to be more accessible and thus have a greater user community.
  • The idea of having toolboxes to work directly with hardware (microcontrollers, single-board computers) is great, but one can tell it isn't updated very frequently and there isn't as much documentation available as with more common resources.
  • Our organization had a lot of trouble getting our network licenses to work properly and there wasn't any local service provider that could help us get it to work faster.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
The best thing about MATLAB is the variety of research and development fields it supports. The reason for this rating is that it is best used for medical images enhancement and signal processing, it is also used for speech to text conversion. This tool server is best when the demand is for machine learning.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
The built-in search engine is not as performing as I wish it would be. However, the YouTube channel has a vast library of informative video that can help understanding the software. Also, many other software have a nice bridge into MATLAB, which makes it very versatile. Overall, the support for MATLAB is good.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
The commands and coding language of MATLAB reads a lot more in plain English as opposed to all the periods and other special characters that are needed when typing in Python or Java. Additionally MATLAB has several different function packages that can solve all different categories of problems so you don't have to make a bunch of different code scrips from scratch.
Read full review
Scalability
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
  • MATLAB has made me a better coder. I can see the code behind inbuilt functions which helps me improve my own coding.
  • The various features offered in the software helped me to understand new topics in a relatively short span of time.
  • MATLAB has a rich forum and library which allows exchange of ideas and info with other users. This has certainly broadened my horizon.
Read full review
ScreenShots