IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.
N/A
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016.
Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.
Google Cloud may be a good place but it is not as easy to understand as IBM Watson is. Google Cloud has a lot of things and it is terrifying for a beginner. You need hours of specialization for that. On other hand, anyone can start using IBM Waston just by the following …
AWS Sagemaker is a well-established product that supports on-demand notebooks, data pipelines, and so on, however, it also comes with the learning overhead of the whole AWS stack. It does allow per-defined models, but the benefit of using IBM Watson Studio is that users are …
Organization of data, use of data, manage the data, visualize the data is easy.
Use of the environment for any project.
We can use python or R or Scala in the notebook.
Easy to use, but still requires a lot of coding to use. There is no ranking of models used and models are not persistent, which means you have to keep running the models again every time you leave the session. The filesystem is clunky and need to keep authorizing Google Drive …
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
As an IBM Business Partner, we are financially incentivized to recommend and deploy IBM solutions where it makes sense to do so for the customer. Against other solutions, few have the governance and security that IBM offers, which is essential for any kind of work in highly …
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Lecturer (Software and Information Technology Council)
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is new, and I personally think it's better than sliced bread. There's very little set up to do. Watson Studio needs to up its game against Sagemaker.
AWS stacks up very favourably against Watson Studio, and in fact this is what the customer ultimately chose over Watson Studio after an evaluation period due to the sophistication, maturity, security, and capabilities of the AWS components. The downsides of AWS are having to …
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
R is decent for our needs but in the end didn't quite solve all of our needs so moved on. It is a good tool so far. its been a couple months since we last touched it so with changes continuing and more wide spread use and more info being published this tool will improve. …
eViews is used as an alternative statistical modelling package as it is more user friendly, less scripted and has many more quick and easy data evaluation elements to it, however does not contain the flexibility and breadth of scripting and output options as widely supported as …
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not …
My understanding is Revolution Analytics Enterprise version is not cheap. Thus alternatives for the software could be Hadoop/HDFS level programming using Python and Mahout to achieve same distributed computing. Additionally, Cloudera is coming up with new data science tool …
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
Ratings
45% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
8.00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
MDM Integration
6.40 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
Ratings
52% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
10.00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Data Transformations
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Data Encryption
8.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
Ratings
33% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Revolution Analytics is a very compelling product for Big Data Analytics. It allows distributed computing over multiple hadoop nodes thus allowing HDFS to do its role cleanly i.e. cheap massive storage and it does good job of running algorithms using R or similar programming language on Hadoop. It would be definitely advantage for the organization who uses either R or SAS as their statistical model development tool as Rev-R support both the platforms. Overall, very positive experience with Rev-R.
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
R is decent for our needs but in the end didn't quite solve all of our needs so moved on. It is a good tool so far. its been a couple months since we last touched it so with changes continuing and more wide spread use and more info being published this tool will improve. Depending upon your needs this can be very easy for you to setup, use, and maintain when compared to other tools out there. My suggestion is to ensure you fully understand your use cases first with data sources identified to ensure this tool can meet your needs.