IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. RapidMiner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
RapidMiner
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
RapidMiner is a data science and data mining platform, from Altair since the late 2022 acquisition. RapidMiner offers full automation for non-coding domain experts, an integrated JupyterLab environment for seasoned data scientists, and a visual drag-and-drop designer. RapidMiner’s project-based framework helps to ensure that others can build off their work using visual workflows or automated data science.
$7,500
Per User Per Month
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$7,500.00
Per User Per Month
Enterprise
$15,000.00
Per User Per Month
AI Hub
$54,000.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioRapidMiner
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Considered Both Products
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Google Cloud may be a good place but it is not as easy to understand as IBM Watson is. Google Cloud has a lot of things and it is terrifying for a beginner. You need hours of specialization for that. On other hand, anyone can start using IBM Waston just by the following …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
  • Data ingestion
  • Batch data processing
  • Built-in connectors to Python
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Anaconda and Jupyter Notebook
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is a well-established product that supports on-demand notebooks, data pipelines, and so on, however, it also comes with the learning overhead of the whole AWS stack. It does allow per-defined models, but the benefit of using IBM Watson Studio is that users are …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Organization of data, use of data, manage the data, visualize the data is easy. Use of the environment for any project. We can use python or R or Scala in the notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
It provides better user experience. All your data on cloud and does not take up space locally.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I think they are very similar but IBM Watson is not good enough yet to pay for the services that I can already get from Jupyter Notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Easy to use, but still requires a lot of coding to use. There is no ranking of models used and models are not persistent, which means you have to keep running the models again every time you leave the session. The filesystem is clunky and need to keep authorizing Google Drive …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As it offers more features and can be used for several applications like AI,ML,DS etc.,
Chose IBM Watson Studio
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
We didn’t evaluate other products but we liked what we saw in Watson Studio.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As an IBM Business Partner, we are financially incentivized to recommend and deploy IBM solutions where it makes sense to do so for the customer. Against other solutions, few have the governance and security that IBM offers, which is essential for any kind of work in highly …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
They are close, but I feel Alteryx is more of an enhanced Jupyter capability, whereas WS is more of an enterprise solution for multiple teams
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I am excited with the roadmap of Watson Studio incorporating SPSS Modeler in the offerings.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is new, and I personally think it's better than sliced bread. There's very little set up to do. Watson Studio needs to up its game against Sagemaker.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS stacks up very favourably against Watson Studio, and in fact this is what the customer ultimately chose over Watson Studio after an evaluation period due to the sophistication, maturity, security, and capabilities of the AWS components. The downsides of AWS are having to …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
RapidMiner
Chose RapidMiner
We tried different data tools and we figured we give RapidMinder Studio a shot as one of our employees had experience with it, and when compared to some of the other tools that we used it was the best fit among the test group that we used. Overall it was a little more fluid and …
Chose RapidMiner
For me, the best advantage to use RapidMiner is the ease of use to learn and deploy new processes. Yo don't need to code, you learn fast and it's really flexible when it comes to transforming data. Knime is also good, but not so flexible, and visually less attractive. Pentaho …
Chose RapidMiner
I found RapidMiner to be in a class of its own. It's easy to use, yet extremely powerful for full data analysis.
Chose RapidMiner
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual …
Chose RapidMiner
Used R and RapidMiner Studio. The main advantage for RapidMiner Studio is the reduced need to program. It has a much smaller learning curve, and it is easy to start using the tool and analyzing from day one.
Chose RapidMiner
RapidMiner is much easier and faster to use plus it interfaces with databases easily.
Chose RapidMiner
We selected RapidMiner due to ease of use and a comfortable user interface. It stacks up very well against these tools in the predictive analytics space. For basic analytics and data reporting, we chose QlikView and Qlik Sense as a more robust reporting platform.
Chose RapidMiner
SPSS and SAS are too expensive. Their interfaces are excellent, but the price point is quite high making them inappropriate for higher education. KNIME is my second choice tool in this space, but it doesn't have the same long established english-speaking user community as …
Chose RapidMiner
It's a heck of a lot better than Python, i.e., it's much quicker to get results with RapidMiner. And RapidMiner is less error prone that coding.
Chose RapidMiner
The best part about RapidMiner is it mainly focus on machine learning algorithms whereas other tools focus on mainly the extract transform load (ETL) process. It can serve for all the KDD (Knowledge data discovery) process stages e.g. data cleaning, transformation, modeling and …
Chose RapidMiner
RapidMIner Studio is freely available and requires no programming skills. When compared with other free analytics tools, its graphical and analytical capabilities are far superior.
Chose RapidMiner
You simply cannot do everything with RapidMiner, it is just one tool in your arsenal. I like using Python directly much better with tools such as Jupyter Notebook in conjunction with JupyterHub.
Chose RapidMiner
The problem with R was that you had to code everything yourself and it doesn't do that well with large amounts of data. At the same time the advantage it provided was it has a large user base which means that you could get help easily.
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
RapidMiner
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Visualization10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
RapidMiner
8.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
RapidMiner
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataRapidMiner
Likelihood to Recommend
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
RapidMiner is the best tool to build models on textual data. It is rich in ML algorithms and reduces the need to manually tune the parameters. It automatically optimizes them, thus providing a better solution. RapidMiner again extends great capability for data preparation, its insane connections to almost every data source pulls in the data easily into one environment. And it can comfortably perform data cleaning and process tasks over that. RapidMiner is not so good with image, audio or video data. These data points cannot be used directly in their raw form. They must be transformed into some intermediate form for performing analytics over it. Moreover, there are no connectors to directly pull data from their varied sources. For example, we don't have a connector to read audio data directly from a switch and then convert it to text (although Google speech API is available for audio to text conversion.)
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
  • RapidMiner Studio offers a superb user interface with an intuitive workflow paradigm that is very easy to learn.
  • RapidMiner Studio’s operators make it a complete and powerful tool for data preprocessing, data visualization, and data mining/analytics.
  • RapidMiner Studio provides excellent documentation, countless worked examples, training and support via a large user community.
  • Every problem is solved using a sequence of operators.
  • Statistical analysis capabilities offered with the T-Test, ANOVA, Grouped ANOVA, and ANOVA Matrix operators.
  • Textual data mining operators.
  • Web-based and cloud computing capabilities.
  • Visualization capabilities.
  • Marketplace Extensions – especially Finance And Economics.
  • Process portability.
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
  • Wish the tool was more efficient in terms of processing power. The tool takes a lot of CPU processing power, even for a small process on a small data set
  • Wish there were more options on charts and graphs to visualize the data
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Very fast and user-friendly tool
Read full review
Usability
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Very use to use and learn
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual workflow and therefore it is easier to demonstrate and visualise the processes involves in getting the desired results. Visualization of workflow enhances teaching and learning. RapidMiner is rich with algorithms and online learning materials that can assist students in their self-directed learning on data preparation, machine learning, deep learning, text mining, and predictive analytics. Moreover, RapidMiner repository has more than 1500 machine learning algorithms and functions that students can explore for any case study and assignments. The RapidMIner is also an open platform that can seamlessly integrates with other applications programmed with other programming languages like R and Python.
Read full review
Scalability
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
  • We saved over $100k on our direct mail program by not mailing to those unlikely to respond to our mailings based on our predictive analysis.
  • Our CX team has saved countless hours by automating call scripts to isolate key phrases and code each call.
Read full review
ScreenShots