IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.
N/A
RapidMiner
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
RapidMiner is a data science and data mining platform, from Altair since the late 2022 acquisition. RapidMiner offers full automation for non-coding domain experts, an integrated JupyterLab environment for seasoned data scientists, and a visual drag-and-drop designer. RapidMiner’s project-based framework helps to ensure that others can build off their work using visual workflows or automated data science.
Google Cloud may be a good place but it is not as easy to understand as IBM Watson is. Google Cloud has a lot of things and it is terrifying for a beginner. You need hours of specialization for that. On other hand, anyone can start using IBM Waston just by the following …
AWS Sagemaker is a well-established product that supports on-demand notebooks, data pipelines, and so on, however, it also comes with the learning overhead of the whole AWS stack. It does allow per-defined models, but the benefit of using IBM Watson Studio is that users are …
Organization of data, use of data, manage the data, visualize the data is easy.
Use of the environment for any project.
We can use python or R or Scala in the notebook.
Easy to use, but still requires a lot of coding to use. There is no ranking of models used and models are not persistent, which means you have to keep running the models again every time you leave the session. The filesystem is clunky and need to keep authorizing Google Drive …
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
As an IBM Business Partner, we are financially incentivized to recommend and deploy IBM solutions where it makes sense to do so for the customer. Against other solutions, few have the governance and security that IBM offers, which is essential for any kind of work in highly …
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Lecturer (Software and Information Technology Council)
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is new, and I personally think it's better than sliced bread. There's very little set up to do. Watson Studio needs to up its game against Sagemaker.
AWS stacks up very favourably against Watson Studio, and in fact this is what the customer ultimately chose over Watson Studio after an evaluation period due to the sophistication, maturity, security, and capabilities of the AWS components. The downsides of AWS are having to …
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
We tried different data tools and we figured we give RapidMinder Studio a shot as one of our employees had experience with it, and when compared to some of the other tools that we used it was the best fit among the test group that we used. Overall it was a little more fluid and …
For me, the best advantage to use RapidMiner is the ease of use to learn and deploy new processes. Yo don't need to code, you learn fast and it's really flexible when it comes to transforming data. Knime is also good, but not so flexible, and visually less attractive. Pentaho …
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual …
Used R and RapidMiner Studio. The main advantage for RapidMiner Studio is the reduced need to program. It has a much smaller learning curve, and it is easy to start using the tool and analyzing from day one.
We selected RapidMiner due to ease of use and a comfortable user interface. It stacks up very well against these tools in the predictive analytics space. For basic analytics and data reporting, we chose QlikView and Qlik Sense as a more robust reporting platform.
SPSS and SAS are too expensive. Their interfaces are excellent, but the price point is quite high making them inappropriate for higher education. KNIME is my second choice tool in this space, but it doesn't have the same long established english-speaking user community as …
The best part about RapidMiner is it mainly focus on machine learning algorithms whereas other tools focus on mainly the extract transform load (ETL) process. It can serve for all the KDD (Knowledge data discovery) process stages e.g. data cleaning, transformation, modeling and …
RapidMIner Studio is freely available and requires no programming skills. When compared with other free analytics tools, its graphical and analytical capabilities are far superior.
You simply cannot do everything with RapidMiner, it is just one tool in your arsenal. I like using Python directly much better with tools such as Jupyter Notebook in conjunction with JupyterHub.
The problem with R was that you had to code everything yourself and it doesn't do that well with large amounts of data. At the same time the advantage it provided was it has a large user base which means that you could get help easily.
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
RapidMiner is the best tool to build models on textual data. It is rich in ML algorithms and reduces the need to manually tune the parameters. It automatically optimizes them, thus providing a better solution. RapidMiner again extends great capability for data preparation, its insane connections to almost every data source pulls in the data easily into one environment. And it can comfortably perform data cleaning and process tasks over that. RapidMiner is not so good with image, audio or video data. These data points cannot be used directly in their raw form. They must be transformed into some intermediate form for performing analytics over it. Moreover, there are no connectors to directly pull data from their varied sources. For example, we don't have a connector to read audio data directly from a switch and then convert it to text (although Google speech API is available for audio to text conversion.)
Wish the tool was more efficient in terms of processing power. The tool takes a lot of CPU processing power, even for a small process on a small data set
Wish there were more options on charts and graphs to visualize the data
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
The other product like RapidMiner Studio that I have used is WEKA. I decided to use RapidMiner because almost all modelling methods and feature selection methods from the Weka machine learning library are available within RapidMiner. Furthermore, RapidMiner Studio is a visual workflow and therefore it is easier to demonstrate and visualise the processes involves in getting the desired results. Visualization of workflow enhances teaching and learning. RapidMiner is rich with algorithms and online learning materials that can assist students in their self-directed learning on data preparation, machine learning, deep learning, text mining, and predictive analytics. Moreover, RapidMiner repository has more than 1500 machine learning algorithms and functions that students can explore for any case study and assignments. The RapidMIner is also an open platform that can seamlessly integrates with other applications programmed with other programming languages like R and Python.