TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AWebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.

    $88.50

    per month

    Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AApplication Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Editions & Modules
    Application Server
    $88.50
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
    We did choose because of its dependability, speed, complex environment support, and ease of use. Microsoft Application Server is cheaper than IBM WebSphere Application Server and faster than WebSphere. Microsoft Application Server is a close competitor in terms of features, but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Microsoft Application Server was cheaper then what IBM WebSphere Application Server would have cost us. Also, our legacy applications run much faster on MS Application Server.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
    It has a similar feature to what Microsoft Application Server has but at a greater cost and also having to deal with another vendor when we could use a full Microsoft Stack for better training and support.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    7.2
    31 Ratings
    Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
    8.0
    9 Ratings
    IDE support5.426 Ratings9.09 Ratings
    Security management8.231 Ratings9.09 Ratings
    Administration and management7.831 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Application server performance8.131 Ratings9.09 Ratings
    Installation7.530 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance6.626 Ratings7.08 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (33 ratings)
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)