TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AWebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.

    $88.50

    per month

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Editions & Modules
    Application Server
    $88.50
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    Websphere Liberty has a cloud ready runtime, embebed with a Developlment standards like spring, ee standards

    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has a native connections to IBM products, so when you have a IBM Environtment it the best way to get all IBM Beneffits
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    WebSphere Application Server admin console is very detailed and there are a huge number of configurations available to maintain and configure. JBoss is complex where stand vs full configuration is confusing sometimes. Modularity proved complex there, so I love WebSphere …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    I recommended WebSphere because of my expertise on it and the great IBM support.
    Incentivized
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
    WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server.
    Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
    We decided to use Red Hat JBoss EAP as it lowers our overall cost, supports all the features that we are looking for including clustering, distributed caching and web services.
    JBoss EAP is modular and has cloud-ready architecture.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    7.2
    31 Ratings
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    8.6
    8 Ratings
    IDE support5.426 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Security management8.231 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    Administration and management7.831 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Application server performance8.131 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    Installation7.530 Ratings9.58 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance6.626 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (33 ratings)
    8.1
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    5.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)