Icinga vs. Vercara UltraWPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Vercara UltraWPM
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Vercara UltraWPM (formerly Neustar Web Performance Management, based on Webmetrics) is used to find and fix problems that impact connected customers: unavailable websites, slow-loading pages, and failing applications.N/A
Pricing
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Considered Both Products
Icinga
Chose Icinga
PRTG was the solution that was implemented before. As Icinga is Open Source we saved the licensing fee, as we ran out of free checks. I also had knowledge in Icinga so we switched over.

Nagios is inferior to Icinga in my opinion, as Icinga has the better Web UI, which I use the …
Chose Icinga
Installation and initial configuration is straight forward. However the system can grow in complexity very quickly, if not managed correctly.
Chose Icinga
The best of commercial products is nearly as good at cross platform monitoring as Icinga, and all of them are expensive.
Chose Icinga
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with …
Chose Icinga
While Icinga holds its own against old stalwarts like Nagios and Zabbix, it simply can't compete with the new generation of SaaS service/server monitoring software in terms of ease of use, feature-completeness, integration with things like Cloudwatch, CloudHealth, New Relic, …
Chose Icinga
There are two main competitors of Icinga in my opinion, Nagios, and NetFlow based monitoring solutions. Both are good, Icinga, is a more refined version of Nagios with a much better API and backwards compatibility to the platform. If you are running Nagios, you can transfer …
Chose Icinga
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring.
Vercara UltraWPM
Chose Vercara UltraWPM
To be honest, I am not certain why this product was initially chosen over other products. It was being used when I started working at a new job. I was trained on its use and focused on tracking issues when an alert was given. There are many products that can be used for …
Features
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
Vercara UltraWPM
7.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Remote monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
Vercara UltraWPM
6.3
Ratings
19% below category average
Performance data reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customizable reporting00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Data visualization00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
Vercara UltraWPM
7.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Administrator access control00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Small Businesses
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Zabbix
Zabbix
Score 8.7 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IcingaVercara UltraWPM
Likelihood to Recommend
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
If you need to gauge whether your site is up or down, then Neustar will give you exactly what you are looking for. However, if you need more granularity for specific application or sub-systems and their functionality, this product will need to be subsidized with other applications that provide more data or information on how individual components or systems are working.
Read full review
Pros
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
  • It allows access to a history of checks, how much time they took, and if any errors were detected.
  • It can alert several people, or many in a group, for information related to the application availability.
  • When drilling down into the check, the logs can pinpoint the exact time and code events and how long each step took to respond.
Read full review
Cons
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
  • The interface can be buggy.
  • We have experienced false positives of a system outage that was not accurate.
  • It's not a true measure of system performance or uptime, but simply judges up or down from a holistic view.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
To be honest, I am not certain why this product was initially chosen over other products. It was being used when I started working at a new job. I was trained on its use and focused on tracking issues when an alert was given. There are many products that can be used for monitoring site uptime. Neustar definitely has its uses for monitoring if a site is up or down, but its lack of granularity can turn some away.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
  • Our company at one time gauged overall system uptime using Neustar WebMetrics to provide this data
  • Due to the limitations with the applications ability to show system functionality and uptime we have begun using other methods for determining system uptime for our customers.
  • The interface can be a bit tricky to understand during first use. There is somewhat of a learning curve.
Read full review
ScreenShots