Passly by ID Agent vs. PingOne from Ping Identity

Passly by ID Agent

PingOne from Ping Identity

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Passly by ID Agent	Score 2.3 out of 10	N/A	Passly from ID Agent, a Kaseya company and the service that replaces the former AuthAnvil, is an identity and access management (IAM) platform providing two-factor authentication, single sign-on (SSO) and password management.	N/A
PingOne from Ping Identity	Score 5.4 out of 10	N/A	The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…	$20,000 per year

Pricing

Passly by ID Agent

PingOne from Ping Identity

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Essential: $20,000
per year
Plus: $40,000
per year
Premium: Contact Sales

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Passly by ID Agent	PingOne from Ping Identity
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Try PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	Passly by ID Agent	PingOne from Ping Identity
Considered Both Products	Passly by ID Agent SN Scott Nelson IT Specialist Chose Passly by ID Agent I selected Passly at first as it would allow for a single sign on with azure to Kaseya VSA. Kaseya has made access to different products very different. VSA does not have single sign on with Azure where as Vorex/BMS does. This is a feature that Kaseya should make unified … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Passly by ID Agent Google's Authenticator app is easy and streamlined, like much of Google's products. The home screen shows you the security code and how much time is left. Kaseya's AuthAnvil requires multiple clicks to even reach the security code, and only has a progress bar that lets you … Incentivized Helpful? Leonard Johnson Technical Support Chose Passly by ID Agent Kaseya’s products have a lot of features to them that help an MSP do their job. Accessing and getting to them is a lot easier with AuthAnvil. It’s secure and easy to use. Atera has a similar design, but overall you don’t come close to Kaseya’s products. I often found myself … Incentivized Helpful? Garry Adams Client Relationship Manager Chose Passly by ID Agent We have transitioned our Multi-Factor authentication processes to use either Authy, Duo, or Microsoft Authenticator, depending on the application use-case. We still have some clients using AuthAnvil, but it is no longer our preferred application for MFA. The other offerings in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Passly by ID Agent I am currently testing Okta as well. Okta seems to have a lot more functionality. They have integrations with mostly every SaaS around. They have a smoother Windows 2FA that includes push notifications and Yubikey integration. AuthAnvil is the only 2FA service available for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Passly by ID Agent We are pretty satisfied with the features and price of Kaseya. It's easier to deploy than say Entrust or Symantec. What really makes it stand out is the integration with the overall Kaseya environment and managing everything from one pane of glass. Incentivized Helpful?	PingOne from Ping Identity Verified User Anonymous Chose PingOne from Ping Identity This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose PingOne from Ping Identity We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose PingOne from Ping Identity All contenders were capable, but we had scale concerns with NetIQ's architecture. In the end, what set Ping apart from the others was their level of engagement in understanding our use cases up front during the RFP stage and how they were focused on what we needed more than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose PingOne from Ping Identity I found both platforms compelling from an ease of use and user experience perspective. The decider for me was cost driven as I had already used Ping to drive a self-service transformation in a prior organization, and I intended to do the same at this one. Okta had issues with … Incentivized Helpful? RN Ram Nair Director Chose PingOne from Ping Identity Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Passly by ID Agent

PingOne from Ping Identity

Identity Management

Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
	Passly by ID Agent 6.8 Ratings 17% below category average	PingOne from Ping Identity 6.5 Ratings 22% below category average
ID-Management Access Control	9.20 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)	9.60 Ratings	9.90 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication	1.00 Ratings	9.90 Ratings
Password Management	9.90 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning	1.00 Ratings	1.60 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation	10.00 Ratings	2.30 Ratings
ID Risk Management	00 Ratings	4.30 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Passly by ID Agent	PingOne from Ping Identity
Small Businesses	WatchGuard AuthPoint Score 9.1 out of 10	WatchGuard AuthPoint Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OneLogin by One Identity Score 9.6 out of 10	OneLogin by One Identity Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises	OneLogin by One Identity Score 9.6 out of 10	OneLogin by One Identity Score 9.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Passly by ID Agent	PingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend	1.0 (0 ratings)	7.9 (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	7.1 (0 ratings)	8.6 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Passly by ID Agent	PingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend	From my experience, Kaseya made a mistake with Passly. It does not work correctly. When it does work it is very delayed causing issues for logging into the system. When Kaseya was contacted they could not find users at all. When they finally found the users they could not edit it needing them to escalate to development to fix accounts. Incentivized SN Scott Nelson IT Specialist Read full review	The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	AuthAnvil is simple to use. Whether using an OTP code or push notifications, the application is user-friendly. AuthAnvil applications are easy for the end-user to install. AuthAnvil is readily available across multiple platforms (Windows, Android, iOS). Incentivized Garry Adams Client Relationship Manager Read full review	PingFederate is feature-rich, and quickly updated with the latest standards and profiles. This gives us more tools to apply identity standards to modern business challenges. PingFederate and PingCentral were also easy to deploy within docker containers and weave into an infra-as-code deployment, keeping operational overhead low. PingID has an array of supported authenticators for nearly every use case, and early FIDO2 support has us looking into moving to passwordless much more quickly than I had anticipated. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Web interfaces are relatively complex, not entirely ready for end-users Token transfers are slightly cumbersome (e.g. moving from hard to soft-token and vice-versa) It remains as a separate, local AD-driven solution, independent from external, rising auth platforms (e.g. Azure) Incentivized Ricardo Rodriguez Chief Information Technology Officer Read full review	I believe it is very secure & not sure if it needs any improvement as such Only suggestion would be it should not ask users to re-confirm if the session is still active Incentivized RN Ram Nair Director Read full review
Usability	Simplicity of use combined with price and low system resources. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	They are very helpful with helping us with any issues. There are a lot of helpful guides online if you get lost. Kaseya is also good about not bugging you with notifications. Kaseya offers easy to access to support options. Overall I have not had to contact them over a lot of issues. The software rarely broke or was down for maintenance. Incentivized Leonard Johnson Technical Support Read full review	For our enterprise, they've assigned a customer success manager to ensure our needs are being addressed, and that person is top notch in knowing our priorities, enhancement requests, and open cases. Every time we've needed to engage support for a problem or a how-to question, they've been highly responsive and followed up with us to ensure the case was completely resolved. Their support personnel are highly skilled and trained. This is a very customer-centric company. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	We have transitioned our Multi-Factor authentication processes to use either Authy, Duo, or Microsoft Authenticator, depending on the application use-case. We still have some clients using AuthAnvil, but it is no longer our preferred application for MFA. The other offerings in the market fulfill the same requirement with either lower or no additional cost and are easier to manage and more consistent in their performance. Incentivized Garry Adams Client Relationship Manager Read full review	We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Using AuthAnvil to log into Kaseya VSA multiple times was definitely a loss in productivity. AuthAnvil did provide lots of security for our products because everyone would be deterred by AuthAnvil and Kaseya VSA's labyrinth-like log in process. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	it is positive with saving the cost some drawback with aging solution directory is solid and provide lots of cost saving Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots