IFS Applications vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Considered Both Products
IFS Applications
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications have a very UI rich interface compared to other systems. IFS Applications can be easily and quickly learned with the very good documentation, e learning portals and other learning platforms. The technical implementation of the IFS Applications is very …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation …
Chose IFS Applications
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP.

We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Cloud, IFS Applications and IFS Field Service Management
QAD Adaptive ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points …
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
JDEdwards and now venturing into SAP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
The cost benefit, it is cheap to maintain and adjust than the other ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
I have used JD Edwards and Syteline.

JD Edwards is very expensive in terms of licensing cost , maintenance. QAD is very cheap.
Features
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation4.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files3.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration8.50 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Production Process Design8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Work Execution8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
Ratings
52% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Read full review
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Pros
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • Project Budget control other than Procurement
  • Customer Advance settlement process should be Manual rather then Auto Adjustment
  • IFS GSO Support should be more proactive
Read full review
  • As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Read full review
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Support Rating
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of