IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Salesforce Field Service
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Field Service (formerly known as Field Service Lightning) is a customizable, mobile-friendly field service hub in Salesforce. It provides tools to manage work orders, scheduling, and a mobile workforce.
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Pricing
IFS Applications
Salesforce Field Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Contractor
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Contractor Plus
$75
per month (billed annually) per user
Dispatcher
$165
per month (billed annually) per user
Technician
$165
per month (billed annually) per user
Field Service Plus
$220
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Salesforce Field Service
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Salesforce Field Service
Features
IFS Applications
Salesforce Field Service
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Salesforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Forecasting
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Salesforce Field Service is a powerful and feature-rich solution for managing field service operations. With AI-driven scheduling, seamless mobile access for technicians, and deep integration with the Salesforce ecosystem, it helps businesses enhance efficiency, improve customer satisfaction, and optimize service delivery. While it may be costly and complex to implement, its scalability and ability to grow with your business make it a worthwhile investment for many organizations.
As of right now there is not a alternative that seems to offer all of the functionality with a vision of what is needed in the future. It is my belief that ClickSoftware will remain a leader in Mobile Workforce Management for a long time.
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Having a program that gives sales leaders a real time view was game changing. Time was always an issue because there wasn't always a sales leader available for closing sales. This has allowed for any sales leader to jump in and help make the sale without the need to do a warm transfer.
Overall the training was quite informative but did lack detail in some areas. It had all of the necessary content for an experience product user but didn't offer enough information for a new user to complete the training and then feel comfortable in real-world situations running or managing the software. I would recommend this course for anyone with at least 1 year of full-time exposure to the ClickSchedule product.
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
We selected the Salesforce Field Service Lightning because we are already using Salesforce as a CRM and Salesforce Field Service Lightning is best suited to it so that's why we picked it We also have seen some reviews and Field Service is far better than others and its service is also very good according to its reviews
Negative: Complication to use so we are using time up and employee salary to learn
Negative: We had to hire someone to create and automate our workflows
Pro: Integrates quickly and easy with Salesforce CRM which helps us to keep track of customer, reseller information so we can see where we need to improve on sales